We're arguing about past history here - but what of the future?
If three State Associations are struggling to maintain their basic functions isn't it time to review the whole GFA structure, including the basis of selection of directors and executive, abandon the 'federated' concept which dates fro
On 10 Jun, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We're arguing about past history here - but what of the future?
Very good point - we need to concentrate on the future (but with an eye
on the past in an attempt to avoid known mistakes).
> If three State Associations are struggling to maintain their basic
There IS a Scottish Gliding
Assoc. One of our Club's members was wearing it's jersey last
week.
PeterS
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:08
AM
Subject: [aus-soaring]
Re:Amalgamatio
In a message dated 11/06/02 5:11:47 PM AUS Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There IS a Scottish Gliding Assoc
Oh! There must be a separatist movement afoot. :-)
>From: "Peter Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>There IS a Scottish Gliding Assoc. One of our Club's members was wearing
>it's jersey last week.
Yes, Peter, but I doubt that its existence is fundamental to the existence
of the BGA.
Which was the point of Leigh's comment.
Graeme Cant
__
At 16:28 11-06-02 +1000, Peter S wrote:
>There IS a Scottish Gliding Assoc. One of our Club's members was wearing
>it's jersey last week.
>
>PeterS
Is there really a Scottish Gliding Association (presumably a BGA subset of
all the Scottish clubs?) - or was Peter referring to the Scottish Glid
You would have to ask the member. A Union for a Club sounds most unusual
(or Irish? :)
PeterS
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cleaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Re:Amalgamations
Oh no
- then we'll need a grand army of the Republic to counter the threats of the
separatists. ;-)
-Cath
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, 11 June 2002 5:42
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Recent postings to the aus-soaring list indicate that three of the State
Associations have been unable to hold AGMs due to the lack or a quorum.
This makes one wonder about the future viability of the existing GFA
national structure.
It seems to me that consideration should be given to removing t
I support the concept of direct election
of a GFA management team. However I think we have a constitutional hangup
similar to the Australian Parliament, where the States believe they will loose
representation if the jerrymander institution, the Senate, is made democratic or
(shock horror) el
as a quick summary if you have specific questions ask and I
will try to answer.
Regards
Peter Robinson
Councillor
>From: "Colin C Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Re:Amalgamations and Sta
>Peter Robinson
>Councillor
>
>>From: "Colin C Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Re:Amalgamations and State associations
>>Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:51:05 +10
ED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [aus-soaring] Re:Amalgamations and State associations
Recent postings to the aus-soaring list indicate that three of the State
Associations have been unable to hold AGMs due to the lack or a quorum.
This makes one wonder about the
to enjoy a couple of
hours of ridge soaring.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cleaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [aus-soaring] Re:Amalgamations
> At 16:28 11-06-02 +1000, Peter S wrote:
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
