Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Uli Schlachter
Am 28.08.2010 10:29, Uli Schlachter wrote: > Just for reference, Gregor proposed "draw". So let's start collecting ideas! > - Existing modules are named by adjectives, do we want to stick to that? > - The new name should be related to something visual. > - If a theme is "beautiful", then using and

[awesome bugs] #803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version

2010-08-28 Thread awesome
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version User who did this - Nicolas Dumazet (NicDumZ) -- Except that it has conflicts ;) And... urgh. Git? I'm a Mercurial developer, I know nothing about git

[awesome bugs] #803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version

2010-08-28 Thread awesome
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version User who did this - Gregor Best (farhaven) -- Just using git revert 5d0a81c8bf488 should also do the trick :) -- More information can be found

[awesome bugs] #803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version (Attachment added)

2010-08-28 Thread awesome
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version User who did this - Nicolas Dumazet (NicDumZ) -- Thanks for reporting this for me ;) I'm attaching a temporary patch that allows compiling 3.4.7 with

[awesome bugs] #803 - Adjust minimum required libxcb version

2010-08-28 Thread awesome
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Uli Schlachter (psychon) Attached to Project - awesome Summary - Adjust minimum required libxcb version Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - New Assigned To -

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 28.08.2010 11:11, lukash wrote: [...] > First, does it need (yet another) rewrite? I've briefly checked your > code and it looks nice and simple. But I'm afraid the layouts can get > pretty complicated once you start mixing them together. I'm quit

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread lukash
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Julien Danjou wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28 2010, lukash wrote: > > > If you don't agree, it doesn't really matter what name you give > > it... But it should not be a negative name as jd said. > > `core' is potentially a bad name; we should not clash with

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
On Sat, Aug 28 2010, lukash wrote: If you don't agree, it doesn't really matter what name you give it... But it should not be a negative name as jd said. `core' is potentially a bad name; we should not clash with other existing Lua modules. And this is not describing awesome very well. :-)

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
On Sat, Aug 28 2010, Uli Schlachter wrote: Just for reference, Gregor proposed "draw". So let's start collecting ideas! - Existing modules are named by adjectives, do we want to stick to that? - The new name should be related to something visual. - If a theme is "beautiful", then using and

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread lukash
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Uli Schlachter wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Am 28.08.2010 09:52, Julien Danjou wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27 2010, Uli Schlachter wrote: > > > >> Since there is a plan to split up awful, I started with that > >> here. The

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread lukash
Hi! Thanks for the amazing work you're doing Uli! This looks great and I'm glad something is finally happening :D On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Uli Schlachter wrote: > Since there is a plan to split up awful, I started with that here. The new > widget layouts are called "User(un)fr

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 28.08.2010 09:52, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27 2010, Uli Schlachter wrote: > >> Since there is a plan to split up awful, I started with that >> here. The new widget layouts are called "User(un)friendly >> Graphic Library for You" (tha

Re: [RFC] Bringing the ugly to awesome (new widget system)

2010-08-28 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Aug 27 2010, Uli Schlachter wrote: Since there is a plan to split up awful, I started with that here. The new widget layouts are called "User(un)friendly Graphic Library for You" (thanks for the idea, Gregor!). Since that name is way too long, we need something shorter. Widgets are n