ra system -- quite a different thing that you have in
mind.
--
Waldek Hebisch
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
t; >List(Expression(Integer)))
> >
> >--
> >of which the particular solution is a bit of a jumble. It doesn't seem to
> >be particularly simplifiable
try
eval(sol.particular, exp(-5*x)= exp(-x)^5)
--
Waldek Hebisch
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
AS with Ma-s I noticed that once
examples got complicated enough, then Ma-s could no
longer do them.
--
Waldek Hebisch
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
)::RN)
line gets value of Bernoulli number.
PS. This is essentially using the recursive definition given
in Wikipedia. Wikipedia calls this inefficient, but AFAICS
due to memoization it is much better than Akiyama-Tanigawa
presented in Wikipedia.
--
Waldek Hebisch
closure package which was inside NAG's Axiom.
Things have much evolved now and we may distribute software with free
license.
Thank you, now situatiobn is clear.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom
licence to GPL.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
On 09/09/2014 04:03 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Thanks. However, I have a compilable version for FriCAS.
Huh? Where?
In my machine.
I have waited to have clear copyright situation. Currently FriCAS is
BSD licenced while IIRC the CAD pacakge is GPL.
GPL? What are your sources
of processor is rather hard
to establish, because internal design is kept
secret. But above what proof means is clear and
methods are known -- it is only problem of
huge effort needed for such work.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
not sure how the two sentences above fit together. Do
you mean that there should be a single wiki for all forks
and no attempt to distinguish them?
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing
only one somebody trigger page refresh
(in particular when page is modified).
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
have read them and they seem
quite accurate.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
recursive
types (single recursion is doable by using %).
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
.
Regardless of current and future preferences of authors,
it would be shame to loose material accumulated in Axiom
wiki, so I wish the site back.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing
)$UnivariatePolynomialCategoryFunctions2(fF, SUP fF, pF, SUP pF)
In more complex cases you may need PolynomiaCategoryLifting.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org
. If you want result which is correct for both branches
you need something like:
-sqrt(a^2)/a^2
but such expressions cause trouble so limit decided just to pick
one branch...
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Type: Boolean
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebi...@math.uni.wroc.pl
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+20080620 wxh src/algebra/vector.spad handle direct product multiply
AFAIK this patch is due to Bill Page.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer
is makeAxFile which is almost identical
to makeAxExportForm but prints the result to a file (named by
the filename argument).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http
on
statistics()
@
Index: ChangeLog.wh
===
--- ChangeLog.wh(wersja 278)
+++ ChangeLog.wh(kopia robocza)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2008-05-08 Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * src/algebra/intef.spad.pamphlet: lfextendedint
' (and extra code
to handle remaining cases).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
, t, 0)_
- first Phi Psi Phi [x,y,Z2]
gives me 0.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
seem to speak
about http://ws.apache.org/commons/axiom.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
in the same way. So the
question is which versions of Aldor use the formula above?
Did Axiom always use wrong formula or is this a change in
Aldor?
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom
equations for
this set. But then we are left with problem of finding integral points
on an algebraic surface. I would be surprised if Mathematica really can
solve this problem (that is give correct solutions and prove that there are
no others).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
)?
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
is computed relative to
total degree reverse lexicografic ordering, while your original
code requested lexicographic ordering.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
Martin Rubey wrote:
Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following patch changes installation directory from
$PREFIX/lib/axiom to $PREFIX/lib/fricas and the name of installed
binary from $PREFIX/bin/axiom to $PREFIX/bin/fricas.
I think that we should do this change
Arthur Ralfs wrote:
From: Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You wrote:
Tim, Waldek,brbrThis patch is a band-aid for the
hex(10) bug.
snip
@@ -1285,6 +1307,10 @@
-- where it arises. Removed 2007-02-14
concat(concat(mtext,str),/mtext)
-- if we get
this is a literal string
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings!
Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, one problem is that Axiom naively computes the sum.
Another problem is that gcd computations take quite a lot of
time (it seems that other systems can compute gcd 10-100
times faster).
Does axiom use
that the computation would
finish (or run out of memory) in few days.
Now, one problem is that Axiom naively computes the sum.
Another problem is that gcd computations take quite a lot of
time (it seems that other systems can compute gcd 10-100
times faster).
--
Waldek
FriCAS bug tracker was created. Certainly, common
bug tracker make sense only if one can restrict view so that
only bugs reported against given fork are visible. Technically,
this should be not a problem...
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-sandbox I worked around the problem by making sure that for
user compiler::*default-system-p* is set to nil (it _must_ be set
to t during build).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom
to
the short row) I get rank 8 and [[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0]] as
nullSpace.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom
).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
. In vmlisp.lisp we have:
(defmacro ne (a b) `(not (equal ,a ,b)))
so original meaning was (not (equal x cache)). Shoe changes
NE to /= leading to error...
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
| The problem is due to incomplete conversion form old Boot to Shoe.
| Originally clam.boot was translated by old Boot and NE was passed
| unmolested to Lisp output. In vmlisp.lisp we have:
|
| (defmacro ne (a b
*/
atexit(clean_socket);
MenuServerOpened = 1;
(with dead store eliminated). In other words, you unconditionally
set MenuServerOpened to 1. I am not sure if this will show up
in testing, but is clealy wrong.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Lisp and a Lisper will
still have trouble translating Spad syntax to Lisp.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom
by need to have unevaluated argument).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
encoding).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
) it
worked fine.
PS: In general you should report FriCAS problems on fricas-devel
mailing list. I send this message also to axiom-devel because the
problem may affect all Axiom derivatives.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
that differences between fnew.lisp fnewmeta.lisp
are trivial (due to different Lisp printer).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
have changed dom: to domain and pkg: to package, but
I have missed a few places.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
not notice it.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
lengths if numerical result is suspect I use
extra verification.
- for large arguments I use over-estimate.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http
)
Once of them must go. I suggest to remove the definition in
hypertex.boot.pamphlet.
We should remove version in hypertex.boot.pamphlet. However,
AFAICS $SendXEventToHyperTeX and SendXEventToHyperTeX is unused
so we could also remove both.
--
Waldek Hebisch
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
that Axiom will remember your package.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
is IMHO a different operation than
Axiom factor function.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
IntegralDomain.
In GROEBSOL GeneralizedMultivariateFactorize is used for GcdDomain.
My impression is that GROEBSOL works on best effort basis, so
using squareFree may be reasonable here.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, and in general
to limit dependency on GCL internals. I belive that currently almost
all dependencies are conditional (otherwise sbcl/clisp port would not
work). My intension is keep non-portable (using conditionals) code
separately from the rest of Axiom.
--
Waldek
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Camm Maguire wrote:
Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote:
There are several functions involved. In case of #OBJNULL using
traces I see that |compDefineCapsuleFunction| function (defined
in 'define.boot.pamphlet') gets:
1 (|compDefineCapsuleFunction
domain vector. So ATM it not clear if both failures are related.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
are just due to few bugs...
I also re-tried build at safety 1: it fails early (more details
in another mail).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http
(|compElt| (|elt| $ (|Zero|)) |$EmptyMode|
3 (|compElt|
((|call| (XLAM |ignore| '#OBJNULL)) $
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
or something in gcl changed.
But now I see:
(DEFUN |ALIST;dictionary;$;1| ($) (SPADCALL NIL (QREFELT $ 11)))
(the same as in other dialects), while earlier 2.7 gave me:
(DEFUN |ALIST;dictionary;$;1| ($)
(PROG () (RETURN (SPADCALL NIL (QREFELT $ 11)
--
Waldek
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! My apologies -- obviously I'm testing with the source tree
in place. It should be fixed now. Please let me know if problems
persist.
The latest cvs version installs fine. Thanks.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Greetings!
Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am now testing yesterday gcl-cvs. I have set up safety to 3. I hit
two problems. One is segfault -- it went away when I tried to debug
it:
)compile RADCAT.spad
Segmentation violation: c stack ok:signalling error
to do with new code.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
text at SourceForge).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
cmpnew
pcl clcs) unixport/gcl.script
install_command:
rm -f bin/$(BINSCPT)
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
this may matter: syntax
errors frequently leave parser in a confused state, making hard to
detect other errors. Also for users is seem easier to have simple
syntax + set of semantic constraints than to encode constraints
in syntax.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
gcl-2.7.0 we get subtly different code, other Lisps
(gcl 2.6.8, sbcl, clisp) just give:
(DEFUN |DFLOAT;base;Pi;7| ($) (FLOAT-RADIX 0.0))
that is the outer PROG and RETURN are missing (I see this difference
for many other functions).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL
tree and revision 636.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: src/interp/spaderror.lisp.pamphlet
===
--- src/interp/spaderror.lisp.pamphlet (wersja 636)
+++ src/interp/spaderror.lisp.pamphlet
#+:GCL
(eval-when
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
(apply system:universal-error-handler type correctable? op
continue-string error-string args )
-
+|#
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
layout.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
know more distinction.
Also, ATM I am not setting up a separate mailnig list -- let me know
if you do not want FriCAS traffic on Axiom maining list.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Lisp code, the second works. It showed up first in
sbcl port. This fix is due to Greg Vanuxem (as noted in the comment).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
invokes the 'cp' program)
copy file (likewise)
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
that comunity needs clear
situation. Otherwise inside we risk quarrels that make cooperation
difficult and from outside project looks unfocused, which limits
comunity growth.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom
were
making a release tarball now I would probably include gcl-2.6.8-pre
inside and made it a default.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
be build are build already.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
I must say that I fully
support William's proposal. In fact, he very much articulated
pragmatic approach to Axiom developement that I tried to advocate.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing
GCL constructs.
The other operations may include dereferencing foreign pointers
and block copy between foreign memory and Lisp.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer
instead of `pwd`/mnt/linux
I would like to correct what I wrote above. I made a mistake
and tried to build silver on machine where libXpm.a was not
intalled. The build works when machine has libXpm.a installed
(at least it worked on 64-bit gentoo).
--
Waldek
to hypertex program, interpeter and libspad.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
newer gcl version
from cvs, it failed exactly in the same place as previously. Following
your advice I edited the problematic file and restarted the build.
Log of build after restart is at:
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/prog/mlogg2
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL
Le samedi 23 juin 2007 ? 21:08 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
Do you think we should set *read-default-float-format*
to T? I must admit that in Lisp/boot sources I would prefer to
explicitly specify double precision (when needed), while for
Spad/input we are (or should be) using our
we could embed into Axiom the
last ChangeLog entry (or even the whole ChangeLog if that is
preferable), but I am not sure if we want this.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom
separately about dependencies between various parts
and possiblities to do merge in stages. However, my
conclusion is that doing merge in stages requires much
extra work and there is good chance that intermediate
stages will be more or less broken.
--
Waldek Hebisch
Gregory Vanuxem wrote:
Le dimanche 24 juin 2007 ? 14:03 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
Concerning writablep: I looked at your code. But AFAICS we would
need a separate version for each Lisp system. And the code is
actually more complicated than C version. So I think it is better
,loc3=#compiled-function compile-file}
[ihs=2]
BOOT
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/prog/clogg
The build log is at:
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/prog/mlogg
The machine is 64-bit dual core Pentium D 805 running Debian etch.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom
Greg, thanks for your comments, they are very helpful.
Gregory Vanuxem wrote:
Le mardi 12 juin 2007 ? 14:54 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
Could you be more specific about file handling in Windows SBCL? AFAIK
makedir is problematic (but I hoped that it would work if you have mkdir
pcl::caching-miss pcl::invoke-emf
simple-condition-format-control pcl::accessor-miss pcl::update-dfun
PCL::FREE-CACHE
Newly traced functions: NIL
I will try '--enable-debug'...
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, no .c file).
BTW: it looks that at that stage I have 167 gazonk* files in the
/tmp directory -- it looks that gcl is leaving trash files there.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom
compilation/loading it is not
enough to set *load-verbose* and *compile-verbose* to nil.
One also have to handle various conditions (see for example
|load_quietly| in axiom-lisp.lisp.pamphlet).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
