Ryan,
I believe all three problems are resolved and have been put into SVN.
Please try the latest code in SVN and let me know the results.
Thanks.
Nadir Amra
"McCullough, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/23/2008 11:22:37
AM:
> Here are a list of issues I encountered with the generated
Ryan,
For #2, can you give me a simple WSDL that recreates problem instead of
having me try to recreate WSDL? I think I know what the problem is, but I
need to verify against a WSDL.
Nadir Amra
"McCullough, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/23/2008 11:22:37
AM:
> Here are a list of is
Fyi, I am using MS VC 6.0 and I believe I have sp5 installed.
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Nadir Amra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:41 AM
To: McCullough, Ryan
Cc: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: RE: No answers?
Will take a look at these...I think (1) is my
; writer.write(tab1 + "if (strcmp(peekedElementName" + soapTagName +
",
> \"" + soapTagName + "\") == 0)\n");
> tab2 += "\t";
> }
>
> I had to append the soapTagName to the peekedElementName, otherwise I
got
> re-de
ded dll) to get the libraries to load correctly on windows xp
with IE7 (stupid dwmapi.dll issue).
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: McCullough, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:23 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No answers?
Her
4) The fourth issue I had is more specific to my wsdl and c++. I have a
class called timezone, this caused compilation errors because timezone
already exists in vc98\include\time.h. So, what I did was add a function to
CUtils that formats the name of user defined types to start with a capital
letter.
Ryan,
minOccurs="0" and nillable-"true" are both handled as pointers.
As far as response headers, I will have to do some investigation because I
do not know the answer off hand. However, just in case I would need to
implement, we would be interested in the code that you added to
SoapDeSerial
Using 1.5 and 1.6Beta is bad idea...yes, latest code in SVN is better than
zip distributions.
Nadir Amra
Integrated Web services for i5/OS
IBM Rochester, MN, (Tel. 507-253-0645, t/l 553-0645)
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"McCullough, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/22/2008 01:58:03
PM:
>
Am I better off using the code in SVN rather than the zip distributions? Is
using 1.5 a bad idea?
-Original Message-
From: Nadir Amra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:37 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: Re: No answers?
I guess I must have missed the posts
: McCullough, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: RE: No answers?
See the attached messages.
-Original Message-
From: Nadir Amra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:37 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject
See the attached messages.
-Original Message-
From: Nadir Amra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:37 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: Re: No answers?
I guess I must have missed the posts...can you post again? I do support
the client part of Axis 1 C
I guess I must have missed the posts...can you post again? I do support
the client part of Axis 1 C++, and answer questions when I can. However,
if there are problems that I cannot easily reproduce then my standard
answer is to first go to the latest code base (i.e. download source from
svn a
Just clients. We are providing both Java and C++ clients, thus we are using
the respective Axis 1 distribution.
-Original Message-
From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:07 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: Re: No answers?
McCullough
generate C clients and
services with WSDL2C.
Are you using Axis 1 C++ for both services and clients or only clients?
Samisa...
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:27 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: Re: No
List
Subject: Re: No answers?
McCullough, Ryan wrote:
>
> I have made a couple posts to this mailing list and have never
> received responses. Should I go elsewhere for questions regarding Axis
> 1 c++ 1.6b?
>
I am out of touch with Axis 1 C++. Almost all the active developers
a
McCullough, Ryan wrote:
I have made a couple posts to this mailing list and have never
received responses. Should I go elsewhere for questions regarding Axis
1 c++ 1.6b?
I am out of touch with Axis 1 C++. Almost all the active developers
around this list now are more into Axis2/C.
Is it
16 matches
Mail list logo