Hi,
> Fast infoset has only two advantages, IIUC. It must have better
> performance it terms of reading and writing and also it should be
> smaller in size to the XML the that it represents.
Well.. Depending on the performance of the FI encoder & decoder it
might even be slow in terms of reading an
My gut feeling says binary XML must be faster, as Eran said both
parsing and writing should be faster. (otherwise all those people
justifying binary protocols are in serious trouble ).
One simple test is to do a performance evaluation of XML reading and
writing using fast infoset and a convention
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sanjaya Karunasena wrote:
>
> The advantage it should have over gzip is the fact that FI parsers read/write
> the XML in its binary format.
Fast infoset has only two advantages, IIUC. It must have better
performance it terms of reading and writing a
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> Sanjaya Karunasena wrote:
> > On Friday 28 September 2007, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> >> From my testing so far, it
> >> looks like "Fast Infoset" actually runs a little /*slower*/ than text
> >> XML when client and server are on the same system
Sanjaya Karunasena wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
From my testing so far, it
looks like "Fast Infoset" actually runs a little /*slower*/ than text
XML when client and server are on the same system.
Well, the advantage here is the size of the message. That of
On Friday 28 September 2007, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Sanjaya.
>
> Did you run any performance tests with this? From my testing so far, it
> looks like "Fast Infoset" actually runs a little /*slower*/ than text
> XML when client and server are on the same system. That's not exa
Thanks for the info, Sanjaya.
Did you run any performance tests with this? From my testing so far, it
looks like "Fast Infoset" actually runs a little /*slower*/ than text
XML when client and server are on the same system. That's not exactly an
impressive result. :-)
- Dennis
--
Dennis M.
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> I wanted to do some performance tests with Fast Infoset, but can't find
> anything about how to use this feature. There should probably be
> something added to the documentation, since this was one of the new
> features listed for the 1.3 rele
I wanted to do some performance tests with Fast Infoset, but can't find
anything about how to use this feature. There should probably be
something added to the documentation, since this was one of the new
features listed for the 1.3 release.
Anyone know how to turn this on?
- Dennis
--
Denn
