~Future is Open~
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:25 AM
Subject: RE: [Axis2] More about service groups
Glen wrote:
There would only be one common filename - the differentiation would
happen via the XML
Glen wrote:
> There would only be one common filename - the differentiation would
> happen via the XML inside the file, which would either be
> or .
>
> I'm +1 for this idea of switching based on the XML, and I like
> "services.xml" as the file name.
+1
services.xml with or in it would be very
Hi Dennis, all:
rather than introducing new description file I like to have
service.xml insider archive file and which root element can either be
or , if the root element is I will
create ServiceGroupDescription by giving archive name as group name
and the group only contain one service. I
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:42 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
Hi all;
+1 for proposal ,
But I have some comments ,
rather than introducing new description file I like to have service.xml
insider archive file and which root element can either be or
, if the root
2 AM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] More about service groups
>
> Hi all;
>
> +1 for proposal ,
>
> But I have some comments ,
> rather than introducing new description file I like to have
service.xml
> insider archive file and which root ele
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> An alternative is to use one file service.xml (or rename to
> package.xml ??) which contains either
>..
> or
>
>..
>..
>
>
> The deployment code can figure out which case it is base
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:42 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> +1 for proposal ,
>
> But I have some comments ,
> rather than introducing new description file I like to have service.xml
> insider archive file and which root element can either be or
> , if the root element is I wil
~Future is Open~
- Original Message -
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Axis2] More about service groups
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:49 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:49 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> I think we do not need to introduce new archive file or
> description to solve this problem , so my idea is this
> no matter archive file contain a service or service-group, the
> archive file contain ser
hi all;
see my comments below;
Thanks, Deepal~Future
is Open~
- Original Message -
From:
Ajith
Ranabahu
To: Axis developer list
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 5:36
PM
Subject: [Axis2] More about
Ajith,
Good stuff. Let's start with implementing this and see what else crops up :)
thanks,
dims
On 9/12/05, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> We had some discussions among ourselves about the Service groups (refer the
> IRC chat on 31st of August) and came up with some sug
Hi all,
We had some discussions among ourselves about the Service groups (refer
the IRC chat on 31st of August) and came up with some suggesions.
Following is a brief account of what was discussed and how we sought
out possible solution.
For the folks who are not familiar with the whole business o
12 matches
Mail list logo
