On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> Hi Asankha, all:
>
> Asankha C. Perera wrote:
>> Hi Jarek
>>> I agree with changing the transport dependencies to test scope but in
>>> general I'm a little concerned about the circular dependency between
>>> axis2 and axis2-transport modules
Hi Asankha, all:
Asankha C. Perera wrote:
> Hi Jarek
>> I agree with changing the transport dependencies to test scope but in
>> general I'm a little concerned about the circular dependency between
>> axis2 and axis2-transport modules. Because of that circular dependency
>> I think we have to rele
Hi Jarek
I agree with changing the transport dependencies to test scope but in
general I'm a little concerned about the circular dependency between
axis2 and axis2-transport modules. Because of that circular dependency
I think we have to release axis2 and axis2-transport at the same time
(at leas
I agree with changing the transport dependencies to test scope but in
general I'm a little concerned about the circular dependency between
axis2 and axis2-transport modules. Because of that circular dependency
I think we have to release axis2 and axis2-transport at the same time
(at least the base,
Asankha,
I agree with your changes and I share your point of view that we
should reduce dependencies an the transports to a minimum. From what
I've seen, the problem is simply that some modules depending on
addressing, clustering and/or saaj (the ones you changed) implicitly
rely on the fact that
Hi Andreas
I had to revert this change (and the previous one) because they cause
the Axis2 build to fail (not in the modules you changed, but in
modules depending on those, e.g. jaxws and metadata).
Thanks.. and I am sorry I couldn't run the full build of Axis2.. but I
did test the modules I
Asankha,
I had to revert this change (and the previous one) because they cause
the Axis2 build to fail (not in the modules you changed, but in
modules depending on those, e.g. jaxws and metadata).
Andreas
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 19:03, wrote:
> Author: asankha
> Date: Tue Jan 13 10:02:54 2009
