Ski Kacoroski writes:
> I am running backuppc_2.1.1-2 on debian stable (sarge) servers. I
> upgraded from backuppc_2.1.0-9 a bit ago (not sure when). We just
> noticed that for Entourage email databases (like PST files on windows),
> the database is only being partially backed up and it shows
Hi,
today I noticed a very high load (>15) on one backuppc server. The reason
was the BackupPC_tarExtract process. As a result of the hight load other
applications running on this host had problems and timed out. This is not
our main backuppc host, it is mainly used as our monitoring system
(nagio
Hello, Please i have a problem with restoring a mysql's database file backed up with dump command of BackupPC-2.1.1. Restoring this give an error of restoring failed:(unable to read 4 bytes). Please what can cause this? Regards.
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau
Craig Barratt wrote:
Regis: are you saying the restore mostly works, but some files
are missing? Or does the entire restore fail?
Yes, just some files or directories are missing.
Are you restoring to "/" or a subdirectory?
Yes, I restore to / But the problem is the same restoring a
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 08:43 +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use backuppc to backup a number of machines, including one server
> containing about 70gb of data.
>
> About two weeks ago my backups suddenly slowed down. Instead of
> incrementals taking a very lookng time. I tried to fix t
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:19 +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:20:14PM +0100, Guus Houtzager wrote:
[...]
> > Let me guess: ext3 filesystem? If yes, you've just been hit by the "ext3
> > doesn't scale for large number of files" problem. Use reiser or xfs.
> Wrong guess :-)
>
i have decided that maybe i should try smb instead of rsync when backing
up my server, as i am having some problems with rsync..
i just need to know if this setup will work..
i am putting the backuppc server offsite, across town..
if the server is across town, behind a router, and the server
That's what I do and it works fine (as long as you don't mind the speed
issues).
However, I think you need to make sure you don't have any firewalls
blocking your path.
Also, be careful with netbios lookups (nmblookup). In this case, it's a
broadcast and shouldn't be routed. Either use WINS or
On 11/16 10:42 , Les Mikesell wrote:
> Even when rsync does a full, it just sends the filename list, then
> exchanges block checksums over the files that already match. This
> may take a long time but it uses very little bandwidth for the
> unchanged files.
unfortunately, it seems that if the l
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 10:51, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 11/16 10:42 , Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Even when rsync does a full, it just sends the filename list, then
> > exchanges block checksums over the files that already match. This
> > may take a long time but it uses very little bandwidth
Couldn't BackupPC_nightly and BackupPC_link make use of a semaphore?
- Wade
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Barratt
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 12:24 AM
To: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 05:48 +0100, Rutger wrote:
>> BTW:
>>
>> This was my output... no Remote-user. On the commandline it works, at
>> the
>> browser it doesn't.
> What messages are listed in the apache error log?
> On my system that is /var/log/apache2/error.log
As said before: Premature end o
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 11:25, Rutger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 05:48 +0100, Rutger wrote:
> >> BTW:
> >>
> >> This was my output... no Remote-user. On the commandline it works, at
> >> the
> >> browser it doesn't.
> > What messages are listed in the apache error log?
> > On my system that is
I have been trying to get BackupPC implemented on my network and have
had reasonable success other than with one server.
Unfortunately, this is my primary file server!
Both the BackupPC machine and the file server are running Debian Linux
(Sarge) and I am using rsync for the backups. Filesyste
Try "$Conf{ClientTimeout} = ;" in your config.pl
file (or in the offending server's configuration file).
On 11/17/05, Ken Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to get BackupPC implemented on my network and have
> had reasonable success other than with one server.
>
> Unfortunately,
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:27 -0500, Ken Long wrote:
> I have been trying to get BackupPC implemented on my network and have
> had reasonable success other than with one server.
>
> Unfortunately, this is my primary file server!
>
> Both the BackupPC machine and the file server are running D
That's why I prefer to use tar;
First off, with "ssh -C -o CompressionLevel=9" you get decent
compression. Secondly, there is no need to compare files to and fro
between machines. I imagine the whole 'do you have this' - 'no I dont' -
'this?' - 'yes I do' process rsync does will in the end be a l
On 11/17 08:59 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First off, with "ssh -C -o CompressionLevel=9" you get decent
> compression. Secondly, there is no need to compare files to and fro
> between machines. I imagine the whole 'do you have this' - 'no I dont' -
> 'this?' - 'yes I do' process rsync does will i
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's why I prefer to use tar;
>
> First off, with "ssh -C -o CompressionLevel=9" you get decent
> compression. Secondly, there is no need to compare files to and fro
> between machines. I imagine the whole 'do you have this' - 'no I dont'
On 11/15 10:23 , Craig Barratt wrote:
> Here's the plan. Can anyone see a problem with doing this?
> BackupPC_nightly and BackupPC_link are still mutually exclusive.
> But BackupPC_dump can overlap BackupPC_nightly.
This would be great, because under the current scheme, when backups take
more tha
On 11/17 11:13 , Les Mikesell wrote:
> The remote rsync doesn't send the hash matching the backuppc naming
> scheme, so it can't identify matches that aren't in the previous
> tree for that host.
oh. I thought that the backuppc pool heirarchy was just based on the md5sum
(or similar hash) of the
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 17:16, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > Note that ssh also has a config file where you can specify
> > CompressionLevel from 1 to 9 (default is 6). See man ssh_config.
> > You could also enable compression there if you want it for every
> > host.
>
> thanks for the hint. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
