Hi Mark,
FYI, the reason why i need to upgrade my backuppc is the configuration little
bit harder than newer version,
Before, i've installed backuppc into my GGibbon box, and it come with version
3.x.x if i 'm not wrong.
It's easily to configure hosts that will be backup. Okey, untill now, what
I'd also like to know what's involved in doing this.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wahyu
Mahardian
Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2008 3:22 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] How to upgrade 2.1.2ubuntu5
Check your file system and OS settings. Ext3 should be good, but if CentOS
is
configured for small systems it could be tweaked so that there is a limit
like 32k hard
links maximum, or a file size maximum. Again I have not found Ext2 or 3 to
have this issue.
I did run into this (or at least simi
The server being backed up is running FreeBSD 6.2. The backup server is
running CentOS.
As for the directory being backed up, it has a ton of subdirectories and
files, it is a hashed structure. Just still has 40K+ files and
directories per.
--John
Craig Barratt wrote:
> John writes:
>
>> I'm
John writes:
> I'm running BackupPC 3.0.0 on CentOS 4, with ext3 file systems. When
> trying to backup one of our servers, BackupPC logs the below error:
>
> Too many links at /backuppc/bin/BackupPC_tarExtract line 320
mkdir() is failing. It appears that certain file systems have a limit
of ~32
Bruno Faria wrote:
> Hi, I've installed BackupPC 3.0.0 on a CentOS 4 machine. BackupPC works
> just fine up to a point. I have been able to backup severs when only one
> backup is going on a time. But when I have 4 or more backups going the
> server starts to go VERY slow and I can't even access Ba
Hi, I've installed BackupPC 3.0.0 on a CentOS 4 machine. BackupPC works just
fine up to a point. I have been able to backup severs when only one backup
is going on a time. But when I have 4 or more backups going the server
starts to go VERY slow and I can't even access BackupPC's cgi interface.
Whe
Hello,
I'm running BackupPC 3.0.0 on CentOS 4, with ext3 file systems. When
trying to backup one of our servers, BackupPC logs the below error:
Too many links at /backuppc/bin/BackupPC_tarExtract line 320
After a while, the backup process gets aborted.
Any ideas on what might be causing the er
Hi all,
I've already install backuppc on my ubuntu 6.06 LTS Dapper Drake. After
googling, i found that ubuntu 6.06 LTS comes with backuppc version
2.1.2-2ubuntu5 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/+source/backuppc.
I just want to upgrade it to version 3.0.0 or newer.
Any suggestion, how to inst
I am looking to use BackupPC in an environment with several roaming
laptops and a wad of disk on a hosting site.
You might try hosting BackupPC on a host that allows you to use a set
amount of RAM and CPU, like http://www.slicehost.com
Are you using the SMB transfer method? There was a bug a while back
(in smbclient, not BackupPC) when using the SMB transfer method for
files > 2GB. I ran into it on PST files, as they were the only ones
that exceeded 2GB which I tried to restore.
The bug has been since patched, but I ended
Personaly, I use the Exmerge method. Generally it works great - but
fails horribly for PST files > 2GB.
Is there a workaround?
Regards,
Tomas
Mark Best wrote:
> Tony's idea of using Exmerge is just brilliant, But it got me
> thinking... Has anyone ever thought of being able to recover _indivi
Hello,
> Instead of trying to have 1 server that handles everything, just
> use multiple servers to do the work. I am interested in the concept of
> using some network/cluster filesystem to have multiple servers backup to
> a single SAN/NAS with the cluster filesystem.
I have this kind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
>
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Adam Goryachev wrote:
>>
>>> In this case, it no longer matters, and for those that are interested in
>>> how to use rsync to transfer a 20G file full of 0's in a few minutes
>>> over a very slow
I have some information for everyone on using rsync for remote backuppc
mirroring.
I have tested this after reading it on an rsync mailing list.
rsync uses roughls 100B per file to be synced so you can do the math to
determine the amount of memory necessary to transfer your fileset.
to find out
first, put the full period to 999 and then make the incremental list
something like 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18, and so on for
however many incrementals you would like between full backups. this list
can go at least to 99, i have tried it that high, but it may go to 999.
then you
I too would find a single admin interface helpful. I'm running 4, soon
to be 5 BackupPC servers. They're at different locations, so a single
pool is out of the question, but I would love to be able to take a
look at all my backups without having to log into 4 different front
ends.
However
Français :
Bonjour, merci pour ta réponse mais en fait je souhaite que les utilisateurs
ne puissent pas faire de sauvegarde complète eux même par le CGI (seul
l'admin aurait le pouvoir de le faire).
Je voulais donc savoir si il était possible de supprimer le bouton "Démarrer
la sauvegarde complète
FRANCAIS :
Bonjour,
Il n'est pas très judicieux de ne faire que des incrementales (incr) car
des incr se basent sur des full pour ne sauvegarder que la différence.
Cependant, tu peux régler l'intervalle de tes full via l'interface web.
Dans le poste souhaité, choisis "Modifier la configuration
Good morning, First, I'm sorry for my English but I'm French.
So, is it possible to disable full backups for users in CGI? I just want
users to do incremental backups, no full
Thanks a lot
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
On 01/20 11:04 , dan wrote:
> alternatively i was going to get a fancy RAID controller like a DELL PERC5
> or something that can take 512MB of cache memory and allow more backups to
> run simultaniuosly but im worried about saturating my T1.
On a somewhat unrelated matter; I'll mention that I like
Jeff McAffer wrote:
> I am looking to use BackupPC in an environment with several roaming
> laptops and a wad of disk on a hosting site. I am not a sysadmin
> expert and looking at the doc it is not readily apparent if this is
> something reasonable to attempt. There are some mentions of
On 01/21 01:24 , Corey Baldwin wrote:
> I'm mainly interested in administering multiple copies of BackupPC from
> a single interface. It sounds like others would like to cluster BackupPC.
>
> Anybody with these same interests?
I don't have a huge need for that right now; but I can forsee that i
23 matches
Mail list logo
