broken) backed up versus the actual number of files moved.
There is a workaround to get samba going again, but I can't seem to
recreate the search terms I used to find the fix.
(Apologies if I'm confusing a separate issue with the one OP brought up.)
~Phil
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021, 6:37 PM
a synology NAS (I've
gone through a couple, issue happened on an old WD nas as well) would cause
a load average spike that would make Backuppc appear unstable, so my
default for many years has been nolock.
~Phil
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 6:45 PM Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users &
ib/log, but the instance doesn't
stay running for very long (minutes to an hour or two), and the LOG isn't
giving me much data. On top of that, deleting those files doesn't always
let the service restart. Thoughts? This box lives a pretty stagnent life,
nothing te
authentication.
~Phil
On Nov 29, 2016 11:42 AM, "Michael Conner" wrote:
> I maintain a BackupPC system for our small museum, backing up about 10
> computers, mostly Windows. BPC is version 3.3.1, running on Centos 7. I
> just upgraded to Centos 7 earlier this year and got everyth
onsiveness issues with backuppc, you may want to change the fstab entry
for the NFS mount point to use the "nolock" option
~Phil
On Aug 5, 2016 2:05 PM, "john boris" wrote:
> I searched the archives for using a Synology but haven't found the answer.
> I have a Synolo
t be the issue.
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Phil markham wrote:
>What OS is the system where you are saving the zip files?
I save the file on windows (7 or 8.1 or 10),
>How do you determine the files are corrupt?
The file are corrupt because the arch
ruption issue was fixed in Archive::Zip 1.49+ (or <
1.18) , referenced here
(https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/34648185/). But since you
downgraded, that shouldn't be the issue.
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Phil markham wrote:
&
Unfortunately, same issue
and tar compression have same trouble.
Le 03/06/2016 à 18:39, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom a écrit :
> If you download a .zip archive with compression=0, does it work?
> There's a known bug in the zip compression which makes it incompatible with
> some zip implementations, or
r,7zip)
confirm the corruption.
>What happens if you try to create a zip of just a couple of small
files? Is that zip also corrupt?
i test with some little jpeg files, and it seems works, in this case.
Le 03/06/2016 à 18:37, Bowie Bailey a écrit :
> On 6/3/2016 12:27 PM, Phil m
Ok i' try to explain
The problem come when I'm using the web interface, and try to restore
several file using download zip archive, or download tar archive.
In these mode, archive are corrupt : their sizes doesn't exceed 20 MB.
i try to downgrade perl-archive-zip version 1.30 to 1.16
I tr
e the guy that says "just
Google it" but that info should get you going in the right direction)
~Phil
On May 24, 2016 18:23, "Gerald Brandt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a WIndows 2003 Server I back up daily. Using the same parameters
> on WIndows 2012 fails. I currently use s
I suspect it has something to do with the way these smaller devices use
SMB. They'll mount via NFS, but that's literally all they'll do is mount.
Glad that fix worked. As soon as I see "NAS" in the title, my mind jumps
to the nolock option.
~Phil
On 9/25/2014
Tom,
You may want to try mounting with the 'nolock' option. I had a similar
issue with a D-Link NAS. It's a quick and easy fix to try.
~Phil
On 9/24/2014 2:01 PM, Tom Fallon wrote:
> Well I've since removed the /etc/fstab as server hung after a reboot but
> it did loo
wasn't aware of the
possibility you mention.
> If you drop the script and just use sudo, you would need $incrDate and
> $fileList without a "+".
Will try this...
Planning to see what rsync is like as a method once I've per
link as a trial run for
> BackupPC.
Please stop hijacking threads.
--
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-backu...@tinsleyviaduct.com
Web: http://phil.tinsleyviaduct.com/
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:38:35 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Phil Reynolds
> wrote:
> > I am having problems backing up the localhost using a tarCreate.sh
> > script - I can do full backups, but the date and time seems
> > impossible
se tar tries to
stat something derived from the time, as if it was a filename.
How can I get round this problem?
--
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-backu...@tinsleyviaduct.com
Web: http://phil.tinsleyviaduct.com/
--
Octobe
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:51:06 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Phil Reynolds
> wrote:
> > > if things fit on a 2.5" drive it would be fairly convenient.
> >
> > I'm using 3.5" drives - I have three, one of which is always
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:46:18 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Phil Reynolds
> wrote:
> > An alternative, but I'm really not sure how it would work, would be
> > to use external discs for the pool.
>
> If you mount or symlink them in the
cheduled one runs!), and no ability to create
> incremental or differential archives. So you may not have the
> flexibility that you want.
Hmmm... this is rather more awkward than I was hoping for.
An alternative, but I'm really not sure how it would work, would be to
use external discs
this
way easier, or more practical?
--
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-backu...@tinsleyviaduct.com
Web: http://phil.tinsleyviaduct.com/
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you acceler
will improve read time and, by proxy, transfer times.
~Phil
Nicola Scattolin wrote:
>Il 30/05/2013 12:56, Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
>> On 30/05/13 18:13, Nicola Scattolin wrote:
>>> Il 30/05/2013 10:04, Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
>>>> On 30/05/13 16:57, Nicola Scatto
ree book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
>
>
>
>___
>BackupPC-users mailing list
>BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
--
>
>___
>BackupPC-users mailing list
>BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
he information you need (including the correct backup
> number).
>
> Hope that helps.
It does, thank you.
~Phil
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your
On 3/20/2013 7:57 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> On 21/03/13 10:41, Phil Kennedy wrote:
>> Self-replying to add a little detail here;
>>
>> The system that failed is a Red Hat Enterprise system (5.9 at the
>> moment.) The system has the backuppc (3.2.0) pool living on a P
, correct? (assuming
all permissions are correct?)
Thanks for the pointers. This event has furthered my belief that
software RAID is crap.
~Phil
On 3/20/2013 12:37 PM, Phil Kennedy wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently had a somewhat odd system failure (poorly configured software
> RAID) tha
, the data *is* there, it's just
not web accessible.
2. How can I tell TrashClean to take a couple days vacation while I sort
out the consistency of other 130 machines?
Thanks,
~Phil
--
Everyone hates slow websites.
What does df say about your backuppc server's partition usage? IIRC the
usage % is only calculated once a day. Is it possible that your backuppc
installation came across somebody's ripped DVD library / warez
collection / VM server and filled the pool?
~Phil
On 9/12/2011 11:2
Look in to using the nolock option when mounting the device. Rrdtool can't get
a file lock, which is likely causing your performance issues. I have the same
device, and had similar performance issues.
~Phil
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9.
mombars wrote:
Hi there.
I'm not an
in a very Heisenberg sense (so long as you didn't observe
it, it was working) I solved the issue by adding the nolock option
to the mount in fstab.
Might not be the same hardware situation for you, but give RRDTool a look.
~Phil
On 7/6/2011 5:28 PM, Andy Stetzinger wrote:
Hey all. N
place to host your pool. My site isn't much larger than yours, I
think you'd be best served by dangling a NAS off of an NFS share and letting
the server crunch numbers while the NAS holds the bits.
~Phil
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9.
"lmirg...@microworld.org" wro
Hello,
for a small office with 2 PCs I would like to setup a samba and
backup-server (using backuppc).
I'm running BackupPC on three other servers (Pentium 4, 2.4 GHz).
Since I have an unused Pentium III running at 900 MHz and 512 MB RAM I
would like to know, if this small machine can be used as
Hey Cody,
Cody Dunne wrote:
> For those of you interested, you can see the current structure of the
> wiki at: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~cdunne/files/BPCWikiStructure.png
gives me a 404: Page Not Found.
> I haven't heard from anyone interested meeting yet, but I'll still plan
> on having it for a
Hello,
dan wrote:
> The wiki was made in a very ad-hoc manner. When the discussion hit the
> mailing list there wasnt much leadership.. backuppc tends to be mailing list
> driven rather than forums or wikis.
I've just look at the (new) backuppc wiki located at:
http://sourceforge.net/ap
Hello folks,
I wanted to add some stuff to the wiki (common configuration) but it seems
that the wiki is no there?
Before it was at:
http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net/
and in the Docs it points to the same address:
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#resources
When ente
Hello,
even when I'm running backuppc successfully on two servers and doing
backups of linux and windows clients, I still haven't fully understand
the dis(advantages) of rsync / rsyncd / samba regarding security.
I would like to see a short table chowing the advantages and
disadvantages of using
Hi Dan,
thanks for dropping in SSH-tunnels (and myentunnel, didn't knew it
before). Of course your setup will be easier to setup than using a vpn.
While reading, I got the feeling that using a ssh tunnel could solve
another problem I've got with one client:
We habe a notebook that is sometimes i
Hey Scury7,
I've asked the same question some time ago and got lots of usefull ideas
what to do, since some of them required some skills I didn't had or a
budget my boss wouldn't give me... you might want to look into:
1) AoE (ATA over Ethernet) - you could add a drive to your BackupPC
Server tha
Hi Jeremy,
I wouldn't connect my BackupPC-Server to the internet without adding
another Layer of security, by putting in a firewall between it.
I'm running two BackupPC-Servers at our offices and they are both
protected by a firewall (IPCop).
You can use older hardware (I'm using two FSC Scovery
usr/bin/sudo /bin/umount /boot';
#-
Is there a way to force a Purge without deleting all the good files?
Thanks,
-Phil Carinhas
--
..
| Dr. Ph
ot';
$Conf{DumpPostUserCmd} = '/usr/bin/sudo /bin/umount /boot';
#-
Is there a way to force a Purge without deleting all the good files?
Thanks,
-Phil Carinhas
--
.---
ck to localhost? Where can I
find documentation for these "undocumented" options?
Thanks,
-Phil Carinhas
--
..
| Dr. Philip A. Carinhas | pac(at)fortuitous.com |
| Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.co
ck to localhost? Where can I
find documentation for these "undocumented" options?
Thanks,
-Phil Carinhas
--
..
| Dr. Philip A. Carinhas | pac(at)fortuitous.com |
| Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.co
Are there any plans to support Unix POSIX ACLs?
Thanks,
-Phil Carinhas
--
..
| Dr. Philip A. Carinhas | pac(at)fortuitous.com |
| Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com |
| Linux Networking & Security |
45 matches
Mail list logo
