On Wed, 2006-01-02 at 16:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That would almost certainly work, but it isn't quite the problem
> I want to solve - unless you have really high bandwidth
> connections to another location. I want to keep a nearly
> up-to-date copy of the backuppc archive off-site. How we
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 15:17, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-02 at 10:28 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > What would be really nice would be if you could make an LVM snapshot
> > and rsync the snapshot as a partition image to a remote file or
> > partition while the source system keeps
On Wed, 2006-01-02 at 10:28 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What would be really nice would be if you could make an LVM snapshot
> and rsync the snapshot as a partition image to a remote file or
> partition while the source system keeps working.
What about a combination of BackupPC and Openfiler? Op
Les Mikesell said:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 08:39, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > On 01/31 08:34 , Dan Pritts wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:28:17AM -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
wrote:
> > > > only solution I can think of, would be to use a distributed
replicated block
> > > > device
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 08:39, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 01/31 08:34 , Dan Pritts wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:28:17AM -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > > only solution I can think of, would be to use a distributed replicated
> > > block
> > > device (DRBD) to mirror the t
On 01/31 08:34 , Dan Pritts wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:28:17AM -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > only solution I can think of, would be to use a distributed replicated block
> > device (DRBD) to mirror the two disks across the network. that 10Mbit/s
> > bandwidth will be pretty lim
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:28:17AM -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> only solution I can think of, would be to use a distributed replicated block
> device (DRBD) to mirror the two disks across the network. that 10Mbit/s
> bandwidth will be pretty limiting of performance tho. (Also, I've seen
On 01/28 08:26 , David Rees wrote:
> Is the backup RAID array at least the same size as the original? Your
> best bet is probably to use tar + gzip to send the whole raw partition
> over the network to the remote machine, but for this to work, you will
> need to be able to unmount the primary so th
On 1/26/06, Ward... James Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have two 1.5T USB RAID arrays separated by 100 meters and a wireless 10M
> connection. What is the best way to sync them? rsync consumes all
> available memory and craters the system. What is the best alternative for
> synching such a
Hi,
I have two 1.5T USB RAID arrays separated by 100 meters and a wireless 10M
connection. What is the best way to sync them? rsync consumes all
available memory and craters the system. What is the best alternative for
synching such a huge amount of data?
Thanks in advance,
James
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
