Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I have uploaded a current build of version 3.0.3, for Win32 and Win64 to: www.bacula.org/downloads Please take care -- I haven't tested either of the binaries. Best regards, Kern On Saturday 05 September 2009 16:49:26 wvoice wrote: > I actually thought switching to the same build platf

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread wvoice
I actually thought switching to the same build platform that you were on might reduce some of the variables. When I was building on SLES (I posted my original message on it, but it's still held for moderation). Under my SLES environment, I was able to build most of win32. It bails out before it a

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I am not sure what went wrong. It seems to me that makeinfo is no longer distributed, so we just ignore that "warning". You are getting an error. See below ... Everything is described in the src/win32/README.mingw file. A number of people have setup both the Win32 build (rather trivi

Re: [Bacula-devel] feature suggestion: convert old f ull backups to? "reverse" incremental backu ps

2009-09-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 04 September 2009 00:59:28 Gavin McCullagh wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I suspect that all that is already possible with Bacula but may require a > > bit of scripting. In short, you need support from a Bacula specialist, > > and we don't do that on this l

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re commended Windows build platform

2009-09-05 Thread wvoice
Hi Kern, I've installed 8.04 and am making less progress that I was with SLES. Right now, I am not building the cross-compile environment properly. I.e., it's failing to build binutils and isn't giving much explanation. I get a warning about a missing makeinfo, but that doesn't look like it's the