On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:31:06AM -0700, wvoice wrote:
> Thanks Graham! So is newinstaller deprecated?
I don't know.
> You're right, I made the changes to ../win32_installer/Makefile and re-tried
> make from ../src/win32. After commenting out the document section of
> win32_installer/Makefile, i
:) You're a good man Graham! That's what I've done too.
Now I just need to fix NSIS to complete things.
Graham Keeling wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:19:47AM -0700, wvoice wrote:
>>
>> I'm actually trying to figure where things are breaking. I ran make in
>> ../src/win32/. Then I gre
Thanks Graham! So is newinstaller deprecated?
You're right, I made the changes to ../win32_installer/Makefile and re-tried
make from ../src/win32. After commenting out the document section of
win32_installer/Makefile, it craps out on the NSIS:
\n= Make of scripts succeeded =\n\n
make[1]:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:19:47AM -0700, wvoice wrote:
>
> I'm actually trying to figure where things are breaking. I ran make in
> ../src/win32/. Then I grep'd for bacula.pdf to see what was trying to build
> it. That's originally what took me to newinstaller. But the same happens for
> win32_in
I'm actually trying to figure where things are breaking. I ran make in
../src/win32/. Then I grep'd for bacula.pdf to see what was trying to build
it. That's originally what took me to newinstaller. But the same happens for
win32_installer as well.
Here's the output of the top level make in ../sr
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:05:01AM -0700, wvoice wrote:
> And as far as running the commands, I did run ../src/win32/make for the
> 32-bit version.
Are you standing in the src/win32 directory when you type 'make'?
--
Le
Funny Kern, but if you re-read your README.mingw file, there is no mention of
win32_installer, newinstaller, etc. Nothing in the doc says one is used and
the other is deprecated.
The directions say to download and unpack a document tarball in the top
level source directory, which is a lot of fun
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 03:19:03 wvoice wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> That definitely solved that problem. I feel as if I'm in the home stretch
> now.
>
> Now I've got a couple of annoying issues remaining, but all of the .exe and
> .dll files are being built.
>
> Things are now bailing on the fin
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 06:19:03PM -0700, wvoice wrote:
> Things are now bailing on the final Makefile in ../newinstaller/Makefile.
As I undestand it (looking at bacula-3.0.2), it doesn't use things in the
newinstaller directory.
It uses things in the win32_installer directory.
I stand in src/win
Hi Graham,
That definitely solved that problem. I feel as if I'm in the home stretch
now.
Now I've got a couple of annoying issues remaining, but all of the .exe and
.dll files are being built.
Things are now bailing on the final Makefile in ../newinstaller/Makefile.
It's looking for the manua
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:05:01AM -0700, wvoice wrote:
> Here's what I'm getting:
>
> Patching binutils
> ./build-win32-cross-tools: 526: patch: not found
Looks like 'patch' isn't on your system.
Try 'apt-get install patch'.
-
Hello,
I have uploaded a current build of version 3.0.3, for Win32 and Win64 to:
www.bacula.org/downloads
Please take care -- I haven't tested either of the binaries.
Best regards,
Kern
On Saturday 05 September 2009 16:49:26 wvoice wrote:
> I actually thought switching to the same build platf
I actually thought switching to the same build platform that you were on
might reduce some of the variables. When I was building on SLES (I posted my
original message on it, but it's still held for moderation).
Under my SLES environment, I was able to build most of win32. It bails out
before it a
Hello,
I am not sure what went wrong. It seems to me that makeinfo is no longer
distributed, so we just ignore that "warning". You are getting an error.
See below ...
Everything is described in the src/win32/README.mingw file. A number of
people have setup both the Win32 build (rather trivi
Hi Kern,
I've installed 8.04 and am making less progress that I was with SLES. Right
now, I am not building the cross-compile environment properly. I.e., it's
failing to build binutils and isn't giving much explanation. I get a warning
about a missing makeinfo, but that doesn't look like it's the
Thanks Kern!
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 September 2009 16:29:58 wvoice wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for 3.0.2
>> and
>> 3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core
>> developers are using?
>
> Ubuntu Hardy (8
On Friday 04 September 2009 16:29:58 wvoice wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for 3.0.2 and
> 3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core
> developers are using?
Ubuntu Hardy (8.04)
Regards,
Kern
Hi,
I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for 3.0.2 and
3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core
developers are using?
Thanks,
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Recommended-Windows-build-platform-tp25295428p25295428.ht
18 matches
Mail list logo
