My Director/Storage/Catalogue run on
- Debian testing dual Xeon 2.8 GHz
- Bacula 1.38.9 (installed from .deb)
- MySQL is 5.0.22
- Backup device is a HP Ultrium 1/8 Autoloader
Clients are a handful of Solaris 9 and HP-UX 11i servers
--
Maxx
Hi,
I'm planning our bacula production environment as follows:
15 fd backing up different dirs each one
15 pools (each for every fd)
15 devices (each with diffent archive and media type i.e.: Media
Type=File-username1)
15 catalogs
15 backup jobs
15 restore jobs
the devices are created as follows:
Hi,
On 10/12/2006 12:58 PM, Raffaele Pantaleoni wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning our bacula production environment as follows:
15 fd backing up different dirs each one
15 pools (each for every fd)
15 devices (each with diffent archive and media type i.e.: Media
Type=File-username1)
15 catalogs
15
I am running 3 different catalogs.
Type 'use' on the bconsole before running the restore command.
It will give you a list of the catalogs you have, and you choose the one
you want.
Bruno Savioli
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
Hi again!
I did some new performance-tests:
All operations are against a directory-tree with 7,255,659,224 bytes
data in 98,025 files.
| test1 | test2 | test3 |
+---+---+---+
bacula-fd, no compression, md5: | 10:25 |
AL == Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AL Still the network is being used and that always involves latencies,
AL syncronization times, etc.
Yes, and that might be the problem. But if it is about latencies
and/or synchronization, then it is a bacula performance problem!
AL No,
In response to Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AL == Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AL Still the network is being used and that always involves latencies,
AL syncronization times, etc.
Yes, and that might be the problem. But if it is about latencies
and/or
BM == Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM In response to Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- A switch (mostly 3Com switches in my experience) that run in
half-duplex
mode, which slows network traffic down by about a factor of 10.
Cisco does this just as often, if not more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anders Boström wrote:
BM == Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM In response to Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- A switch (mostly 3Com switches in my experience) that run in
half-duplex
mode, which slows network traffic down
Isn't possible to do ?
Is BackupPc better than Bacula?
Thanks
Hi to all,
I'm new user of Bacula. Before this I used BackupPC.
BackupPC have a good method to manage backup data for File and DAT at
the same time.
It write Complete/Incremental over hard disk and all complete
restore
In response to Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did some new performance-tests:
All operations are against a directory-tree with 7,255,659,224 bytes
data in 98,025 files.
| test1 | test2 | test3 |
+---+---+---+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't speak for everyone, but the way you asked your question
prevented me from understanding it well enough to answer it.
One tool is seldom better than another, just better suited. Asking if
a tool isn't any good to provoke someone to answer your
Hello everyone, and please perdon my english. i would like to know about
experience with SotorageWorks 1/8 [1] or MSL2024 [2] and Bacula in a
Debian OS. Bacula can use all feature or have limitation with any one?
I only use bacula for do backups on HDD drive and i like to know what's
different
Hi!
My first post to the list...
I browsed through ml's archives and I can see that both DLT LTO-2
should work nicely with Bacula, but I'm need some advice in choosing
between the two :-)
I have around ~100 hours of video on Hi8 tapes which are getting
converted to DV, needs to be cleaned a
Hi
There is a way to simulate a restore operation? I've tried, in a restore
operation, to send the restored data to /dev/null, but bacula is complaining
about it as being not a folder, so, the status report from the end of the
operation is failed. Anybody has any idea? Thank you.
Daniel
BM == Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM In response to Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did some new performance-tests:
All operations are against a directory-tree with 7,255,659,224 bytes
data in 98,025 files.
| test1 | test2 | test3 |
That's definitely an interesting challenge you have there. As you're going to
store so much data, I would recommend an LTO-3 (400 GB native, 800 GB
compressed, but YMMV) autoloader or library - a single drive will require lots
of tape swapping. Performance is very good - provided you have very
Hash: SHA1
I can't speak for everyone, but the way you asked your question
prevented me from understanding it well enough to answer it.
One tool is seldom better than another, just better suited. Asking if
a tool isn't any good to provoke someone to answer your question is
trolling, if you
I use lto2 (daily) and 3 (weekly), with hp960 external and msl6030 with
2 hp960 drives. I previously used a hp 6/60 dlt4 library with 5
drives.
lto is faster to backup and restore. The drives change speed to match
the data transfer rate, which will extend the life of both the drives
and the
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 08:51 -0700, Quinton Jansen wrote:
I'd stay away from the adaptec cards (especially if they mention RAID in
their
specs). There is an incompatibility with tape drives and the raid (even if
turned off), which leads to a huge performance hit (i.e. write speeds way
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:28 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
lto is faster to backup and restore. The drives change speed to match
the data transfer rate, which will extend the life of both the drives
and the media.
Oh, I didn't know that.
The lto media has higher capacity, and cost per data
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 08:26 -0700, Georger Araujo wrote:
That's definitely an interesting challenge you have there.
:-)
As you're going to store so much data, I would recommend an LTO-3 (400
GB native, 800 GB compressed, but YMMV) autoloader or library - a
single drive will require lots
In response to Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BM == Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM In response to Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did some new performance-tests:
All operations are against a directory-tree with 7,255,659,224 bytes
data in 98,025 files.
|
Looks like you're talking about job migration. Look at the job migration
section in the devel manual. This is currently available in Bacula 1.39 BETA.
-Original Message-
From: Sim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: [Bacula-users] File and DAT at the same time
Date: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:27 am
I am Trying to Install Bacula on Suse Linux 10. following are the steps i followed..
1. Downloaded depkgs-25Jun06.tar.gz,bacula-1.38.11.tar.gz ,bacula-docs-1.38.11-1.tar.gz and installed the packages.
2. then,./configure --enable-smartalloc --sbindir=/usr/local/bacula/bin
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jaime Ventura wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to cancel a command on console, instead of CTRL+C
and run the console again?
type . and hit enter.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
Ahi people. FreeBSD 6.1-p3 Bacula 1.38.11 MySQL 4 People, last week i was having problems with freebsd because i enable one Experimental feature that start crashing my backups, on those days, i reset my server couple of times to install new kernel's, on those days i didnt check the system time,
I will be out of the office starting Fri 13/10/2006 and will not return
until Mon 16/10/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:38 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
Is there any advantage of dlt over lto-2 ?
Yes:
- capacity
- speed
- technological lifespan (newer, so will probably be around after dlt is
gone)
- durability (drive match data rate so drives and media have a longer
lifespan
Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
better solution.
dlt components may have cheaper list prices, but cheaper is not always
less expensive or a better value. I would compare the situation to a
fast two-seat sports car and a school bus. If I have 10 kids and
Hi,
On 10/12/2006 3:43 PM, Anders Boström wrote:
AL == Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AL Still the network is being used and that always involves latencies,
AL syncronization times, etc.
Yes, and that might be the problem. But if it is about latencies
and/or
Hi,
On 10/12/2006 4:29 PM, Sim wrote:
Isn't possible to do ?
No.
Is BackupPc better than Bacula?
No.
It's different.
Thanks
You're welcome
but read on...
Hi to all,
I'm new user of Bacula. Before this I used BackupPC.
BackupPC have a good method to manage backup data for File
Hi,
On 10/12/2006 7:43 PM, pedro moreno wrote:
Ahi people.
FreeBSD 6.1-p3
Bacula 1.38.11
MySQL 4
People, last week i was having problems with freebsd because i
enable one Experimental feature that start crashing my backups, on
those days, i reset my server couple of
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:23 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
better solution.
OK. It looks that almost everybody agrees on lto-2.
Now the remaining question is whether is Quantum LTO-2 HH better (I know
it is quite cheaper -
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 22:04 +0200, Gour wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:23 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
Sorry, I didn't read the the question well. Yes, I believe lto2 is the
better solution.
OK. It looks that almost everybody agrees on lto-2.
Now the remaining question is whether
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Jayashri Kuntamukkala wrote:
I am Trying to Install Bacula on Suse Linux 10. following are the steps i
followed..
1. Downloaded depkgs-25Jun06.tar.gz,bacula-1.38.11.tar.gz
,bacula-docs-1.38.11-1.tar.gz and
installed the packages.
2. then, ./configure
On 10/12/06, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,On 10/12/2006 7:43 PM, pedro moreno wrote:Ahi people.FreeBSD 6.1-p3Bacula 1.38.11MySQL 4 People, last week i was having problems with freebsd because i
enable one Experimental feature that start crashing my backups, on those days, i reset my
37 matches
Mail list logo
