No, sorry, it doesn't work. I specified a spool dir (although the working dir
by default) and I specified the maximum size of the spool (although unlimited
by default) but still the tape is written to immediately (while spooling).
Maybe it's because of the old version but I couldn't find
I use bacula 1.38.5 with tape storage devices without spooling enabled. It
sometimes happens that a back-up job fails due to for example loss of
connection. The tape volume is then flagged in error and the next job will
select another volume and request a tape mount after which the following
The SVN has a corrected version of configure (and autoconf/configure.in) that
should correct some (maybe all) of the problems that you are seeing. The
corrected configure creates the bat Makefile before doing the dependencies.
Regards,
Kern
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 19:09, Dan Langille
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:27:04 -0400, Tod Hagan said:
All,
I encountered errors from the update_postgresql_tables script in 2.0.3
when converting an old 1.38.8 postgresql database:
sudo /etc/bacula/update_bacula_tables -h node002
Password:
Altering PostgreSQL
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:23:28 -0400, Ivan Adzhubey said:
Hi,
I am trying to build from sources on an unsupported distribution
(www.altlinux.com, recognized as Mandrake) and so far was unable to
convince ./configure into enabling neither readline support nor batch
inserts. Build
On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote:
H.
I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big
performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my
application, 2.2 seems to be /significantly slower/ than 2.02.
Did you specify
On 15 Aug 2007 at 18:27, Tod Hagan wrote:
All,
I encountered errors from the update_postgresql_tables script in 2.0.3
when converting an old 1.38.8 postgresql database:
sudo /etc/bacula/update_bacula_tables -h node002
Password:
Altering PostgreSQL tables
On 16 Aug 2007 at 8:57, Silver Salonen wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 20:09, Dan Langille wrote:
On 14 Aug 2007 at 17:43, Allan Black wrote:
On 14 Aug 2007 at 9:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 13 August 2007 23:50, Dan Langille wrote:
Does this error mean anything to anyone?
Hi guys
I´m trying to install webacula, following the steps at INSTALL file i
get the follow error:
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Db_Statement_Exception' with
message 'SQLSTATE[42P01]: Undefined table: 7 ERROR: relation Client
does not exist' in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote:
H.
I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big
performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my
application, 2.2 seems to be
On Thursday 16 August 2007 05:21:17 am Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I use bacula 1.38.5 with tape storage devices without spooling enabled. It
sometimes happens that a back-up job fails due to for example loss of
connection. The tape volume is then flagged in error and the next job will
select another
(Have been running mysql and dbchecks last couple of days...)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote:
I've just encountered this message on my system.
I can understand it on MyISAM, but I thought InnoDB had no upper limits.
Does anyone have experience and recovery pointers?
Perhaps
Hi!
I've been having some issues with Bacula when using a somewhat unsteady
internet connection.
Larger backups (spanning 3-4 days) are frequently interrupted before
they have time to finish. This seems to be due to brief internet
downtime out of my control (My ISP is working on the problem).
Dan Langille wrote:
On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote:
H.
I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big
performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my
application, 2.2 seems to be /significantly slower/ than 2.02.
Did
Hi,
I have a Linux NFS fileserver which has to be backed up to a bacula server on
another Linux box. The fileserver in question exports everything that's
needed to be backed up so all files are actually accessible on bacula server
via NFS as well. Should I run my backups via a remote bacula-fd
On 8/16/07, Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Have been running mysql and dbchecks last couple of days...)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote:
I've just encountered this message on my system.
I can understand it on MyISAM, but I thought InnoDB had no upper limits.
Does anyone
In response to Ivan Adzhubey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have a Linux NFS fileserver which has to be backed up to a bacula server on
another Linux box. The fileserver in question exports everything that's
needed to be backed up so all files are actually accessible on bacula server
via NFS
On 16 Aug 2007 at 18:10, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
[crossposting out of impatience, sorry for that]
Hi,
I just upgraded our bacula-server from 1.3.8 to version 2.2.0 using
portupgrade.
Now bacula-dir fails to start:
Could not open pid file. /var/run/bacula-dir.9101.pid ERR=Permission
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:13 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:27:04 -0400, Tod Hagan said:
Should update_bacula_tables be run while su'ed to the postgres user?
Probably. What does \dt show as the owner of the media tables in the bacula
db?
Yes, update_bacula_tables
Hi all,
I'm running 2.0.3 on several linux machines. All the FDs are installed
from the RPMs provided on the site, and all the FDs show links to the ZLIB
libraries on an LDD. I have a several jobs for each server. One of these jobs
is what I call the Small Set, as the size of the files
All,
Rather that try to figure out why 1.38.8 was running slowly after
upgrading RHEL 3 to RHEL 5 and its newer version of Postgresql, I
upgraded Bacula to 2.0.3. Once I got grant_postgresql_privileges running
with help from the list, this message was reported:
psql:stdin:62: NOTICE:
On 16 Aug 2007 at 20:18, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 16 August 2007 19:20, Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 2.2.0 and I'm seeing these messages in bconsole
running under FreBSD 6.2. Similar messages appear each time
I enter the m command. Any ideas?
I just realized that you
Hello list!
Hopefully a quick and easy question.
Lets say I have a bacula server (2.0.3), and I want it to back up two
different clients. Is it possible to keep the clients ignorant of each
other? i.e. if client1 wants to restore files, it can only see the jobs
and files that for that particular
On 16 Aug 2007 at 12:38, Kenny Dail wrote:
Hello list!
Hopefully a quick and easy question.
Lets say I have a bacula server (2.0.3), and I want it to back up two
different clients. Is it possible to keep the clients ignorant of each
other? i.e. if client1 wants to restore files, it can
Hello list!
Hopefully a quick and easy question.
Lets say I have a bacula server (2.0.3), and I want it to back up two
different clients. Is it possible to keep the clients ignorant of each
other? i.e. if client1 wants to restore files, it can only see the jobs
and files that for
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said:
Importance: Normal
Hi all,
I'm running 2.0.3 on several linux machines. All the FDs are installed
from the RPMs provided on the site, and all the FDs show links to the
ZLIB libraries on an LDD. I have a
Hi,
if I remember correctly, in older versions bacula preferred unused
volumes over purged ones, so that all volumes were used over the time.
I now have switched to an usb disc based solution and would prefer that
purged volumes are used first to ensure that the disc space does not get
filled up
On Thu, August 16, 2007 2:29 pm, Martin Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said:
Importance: Normal
Hi all,
I'm running 2.0.3 on several linux machines. All the FDs are installed
from the RPMs provided on the site, and all
Hi,
I am having trouble with my dual-NIC servers: it seems there is no way to
force bacula client on a remote server use a particular fixed
interface/address for data transfers. Even though I have set FDAddress to a
preferred one in bacula-fd.conf on the client, it will still bind to a wrong
The snapshots at http://snapshots.bacula.org/ are out of date. They
were being generated from CVS, not SVN.
All snapshots after Feb 7th have been removed. That's roughly the
date we moved to SVN.
A new snapshot has just been taken and is now available.
--
Dan Langille -
On 16 Aug 2007 at 11:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The SVN has a corrected version of configure (and autoconf/configure.in) that
should correct some (maybe all) of the problems that you are seeing. The
corrected configure creates the bat Makefile before doing the dependencies.
The latest
On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:02:47 Kenny Dail wrote:
I think you want to look for ACL or restricted clients, or something
like that. Look under bconsole for stuff like that. I'm not really
sure because I've never done it.
Thanks for the ideas. Hopefully there is someone who has done
On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:30:36 Stephan Mueller wrote:
Hi,
if I remember correctly, in older versions bacula preferred unused
volumes over purged ones, so that all volumes were used over the time.
I now have switched to an usb disc based solution and would prefer that
purged volumes are
On Thursday 16 August 2007 22:56, Dan Langille wrote:
On 16 Aug 2007 at 11:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The SVN has a corrected version of configure (and autoconf/configure.in)
that should correct some (maybe all) of the problems that you are seeing.
The corrected configure creates the bat
I think you want to look for ACL or restricted clients, or something
like that. Look under bconsole for stuff like that. I'm not really
sure because I've never done it.
Thanks for the ideas. Hopefully there is someone who has done this.
Yes - I have and several others. It
On 16 Aug 2007 at 23:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 16 August 2007 22:56, Dan Langille wrote:
On 16 Aug 2007 at 11:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The SVN has a corrected version of configure (and autoconf/configure.in)
that should correct some (maybe all) of the problems that you are
I think you want to look for ACL or restricted clients, or something
like that. Look under bconsole for stuff like that. I'm not really
sure because I've never done it.
Thanks for the ideas. Hopefully there is someone who has done this.
Yes - I have and several others.
Gustavo Gibson da Silva escreveu:
Kern Sibbald escreveu:
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 21:47, Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
Kern Sibbald escreveu:
[..Lots of text deleted..]
You should most likely open a bug report, but if you want it to get some
attention, you will need to distill it down to a
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 16 Aug 2007 at 18:10, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
See http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=923
gives me a login page...
Log in as anonymous/anonymous and you'll be able to view the bug in
question.
Troy.
Hi,
where x.x.x.227 is client's external NIC address, x.x.x.136 is bacula
server's
external address; 192.168.0.{253,200} are the corresponding private
addresses. As you can see, while fd daemon on client has indeed been bound to
the private address, it still uses external one for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenny Dail wrote:
I think you want to look for ACL or restricted clients, or something
like that. Look under bconsole for stuff like that. I'm not really
sure because I've never done it.
Thanks for the ideas. Hopefully there is someone who has
41 matches
Mail list logo
