Scott Barninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti
viestissä:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should
address the RedHat (and clone) issues discussed recently as well as
introducing support for SuSE 10.3.
Could someone pls. check if the
hi,
we are using bacula to backup our fileserver to disk. Our bacula server
has got 500GB disk space and we want the backup to work like this:
every 1st saturday of a month at 20:00 start a full backup and overwrite
the last one (not enough diskspace to hold 2 full backups)
every monday -
If I have a Fileset that defines compression = GZIP will Bacula
ignore files that are already compressed?
Thank you,
Shon
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?
Bacula has no way to determine whether or not a blob of data is
compressed. It simply grabs the data, compresses it, and streams it to
the SD without performing any other time consuming checks.
I wouldn't worry about it though, GZIP compresses and uncompresses
pretty quickly with little to no
Hey,
Does anyone have an idea of how Bacula handles open files on Linux and
Windows Systems but especially Linux. I haven't been able to find any
documentation on this so if you can point me to some that would be
great. Thanks.
Regards,
Clyde Goffe
On 12 Nov 2007 at 10:40, Clyde O Goffe wrote:
Does anyone have an idea of how Bacula handles open files on Linux and
Windows Systems but especially Linux. I haven't been able to find any
documentation on this so if you can point me to some that would be
great. Thanks.
Can you be more
Thanks for the post Michael. Unfortunately I am still getting the same results.
I changed my SCSI card settings so that the ID of the tape drive was
now:Initiate Wide Negotiation = NoSync Transfer Rate = 40MB/sPacketized =
NoQAS = NoThe tape drive is on the same channel as the hard drives so I
No actually I meant if a file is already open and in use(i.e. being
read or updated) will Bacula complain when it tries to back it up. If
Bacula does not handle this by default can it be made to. I'm
evaluating Bacula for my organization and that's one of the key things
we're looking for.
Doug Sampson wrote:
07.11.2007 02:41,, Doug Sampson wrote::
I am testing the restore function of Bacula 2.2.5 on
FreeBSD 6.2 and in the
process of restoring ~20,000 files recursively from the
/var directory, I am
seeing numerous error messages as follows:
..snip..
06-Nov 17:37 aries-fd
On Nov 12, 2007 11:06 AM, Clyde O Goffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No actually I meant if a file is already open and in use(i.e. being
read or updated) will Bacula complain when it tries to back it up. If
Bacula does not handle this by default can it be made to. I'm
evaluating Bacula for my
hi
i have another problem with the famous bacula !!
in fact in my server i had 2 partition sda1(20go) mounted on / and sda2(150Go)
mounted on /home
and bacula and the postgres server are installed in /var (default)
these days i had a saturation on /sda1 and the partition sda2 was quasi clean
i
Great. Do you know if Bacula can be made to take advantage of VSS on Windows?
-Clyde
On Nov 12, 2007 11:25 AM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 11:06 AM, Clyde O Goffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No actually I meant if a file is already open and in use(i.e. being
read or
On Nov 12, 2007 11:38 AM, Clyde O Goffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. Do you know if Bacula can be made to take advantage of VSS on Windows?
It does that as well. You can enable VSS in the config files on a per
job bases.
John
help me please i'm gonna die
- Message d'origine
De : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : bacula bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Novembre 2007, 16h36mn 25s
Objet : [Bacula-users] bacula-dir dead but pid file exists
hi
i have another problem with the famous
On Nov 12, 2007 12:07 PM, luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
help me please i'm gonna die
- Message d'origine
De : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : bacula bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Novembre 2007, 16h36mn 25s
Objet : [Bacula-users]
On 12 Nov 2007 at 11:06, Clyde O Goffe wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 11:00 AM, Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007 at 10:40, Clyde O Goffe wrote:
Does anyone have an idea of how Bacula handles open files on Linux and
Windows Systems but especially Linux. I haven't been
i still have the same problem
i remove the pid file i restart no change
i've done all necessary non change
any other idea??
- Message transféré
De : John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : bacula bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Lundi,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:40:22PM +, luyigui loholhlki wrote:
i still have the same problem
i remove the pid file i restart no change
i've done all necessary non change
any other idea??
What does the bacula log file say?
-Jason Martin
- Message transf??r??
De : John Drescher
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:37:01PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
If you are backing up databases or other data files which may be in
use, best practice is to dump the data to an ASCII file, then backup
the file.
I'd suggest that it would be better to follow whatever procedure
is proscribed by
On 12 Nov 2007 at 9:48, Jason Martin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:37:01PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
If you are backing up databases or other data files which may be in
use, best practice is to dump the data to an ASCII file, then backup
the file.
I'd suggest that it would be
Hey I want to thank you guys for the info. It was very helpful.
-Clyde
On Nov 12, 2007 1:00 PM, Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007 at 9:48, Jason Martin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:37:01PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
If you are backing up databases or other data
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:00:04PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007 at 9:48, Jason Martin wrote:
use, best practice is to dump the data to an ASCII file, then backup
the file.
I'd suggest that it would be better to follow whatever procedure
is proscribed by the DBMS
where can i find it ??
if it's /var/log/message
nothing special !!
else i know nothing
could u please helpme
- Message d'origine
De : Jason Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : bacula bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Novembre
Doug Sampson wrote:
07.11.2007 02:41,, Doug Sampson wrote::
I am testing the restore function of Bacula 2.2.5 on
FreeBSD 6.2 and in the
process of restoring ~20,000 files recursively from the
/var directory, I am
seeing numerous error messages as follows:
..snip..
06-Nov 17:37
Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 7.4.18. I am seeing the same
errors on another
FreeBSD 6.2 machine with Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 8.0.14
I'm not sure which version of PostgreSQL is required for the batch
inserts. I coldn't find that in the ReleaseNotes, but there was a
discussion on the
On 12 Nov 2007 at 10:27, Jason Martin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:00:04PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007 at 9:48, Jason Martin wrote:
use, best practice is to dump the data to an ASCII file, then backup
the file.
I'd suggest that it would be better to follow
On 12 Nov 2007 at 10:30, Doug Sampson wrote:
Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 7.4.18. I am seeing the same
errors on another
FreeBSD 6.2 machine with Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 8.0.14
I'm not sure which version of PostgreSQL is required for the batch
inserts. I coldn't find that in the
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:32:32PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007 at 10:27, Jason Martin wrote:
John:
I think you meant Jason?
that was well written. Thank you. Can we add the above,
copy/paste, to http://wiki.bacula.org/ ? There is something similar
for Oracle, but what you
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:28:49PM +, luyigui loholhlki wrote:
where can i find it ??
if it's /var/log/message
nothing special !!
else i know nothing
could u please helpme
Check your bacula-dir.conf and look for a Messages block. It
will tell you where the logs go.
-Jason Martin
in fact
when bacula is down there is no pid file
but once i startit the three pid files (fd,sd,dir) are created
but after asking about the status it shows that only the storage and the file
deamons are up and :
bacula-dir dead but pid file exists
- Message d'origine
De : Jason Martin
bacula-dir dead but pid file exists
Where are you seeing this error message?
John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and
i see it on the console
service bacula status
bacula-sd (pid 5574 4530) is running...
bacula-fd (pid 5598) is running...
bacula-dir dead but pid file exists
- Message d'origine
De : John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : bacula
ditto here
Scott Ruckh wrote:
I am receiving the following errors:
rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and the bacula public
No Solution??
:)
- Message d'origine
De : luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : bacula bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Novembre 2007, 19h15mn 27s
Objet : [Bacula-users] Re : Re : Re : re : Re : bacula-dir dead but pid file
exists help me pleaase
i see
No Solution??
:)
It is nearly impossible to determine the problem without you either
directly executing bacula-dir from the shell perhaps with debug
messages on or posting the last few lines of the log file.
John
-
This
i've restarted the bacula server
and that's what i found in the /var/log/messages
*
Nov 12 20:08:51 ilemmaser06 kernel: bacula-dir[7753]: segfault at
7fff68c8ca58 rip 0045fc59 rsp 7fff68c8ca60 error 6
*
- Message d'origine
De : John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À :
On Nov 12, 2007 3:07 PM, luyigui loholhlki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've restarted the bacula server
and that's what i found in the /var/log/messages
*
Nov 12 20:08:51 ilemmaser06 kernel: bacula-dir[7753]: segfault at
7fff68c8ca58 rip 0045fc59 rsp 7fff68c8ca60 error 6
ditto here
Scott Ruckh wrote:
I am receiving the following errors:
rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and the bacula
Hi!
I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version
1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a configure, make, make install to the
location of my 1.38.11 as recommended in the manual. After that, I have
upgraded the database with the script.
Problem: When I apply the parameter
I'm getting something really strange when backing up a few of my
clients, can anyone explain why the batch insert is causing my jobs to
fail?
2007-11-11 01:00:00 secnet-def JobId 4836: Start Backup JobId
4836, Job=sv25.2007-11-11_01.00.07
2007-11-11 01:00:01 secnet-def JobId 4836: Created
Hello all,
I'm having some issues with backups taking a really long time. I can
get 4/5 mbs transfer until I hit about 1.5 million files or so per job
and then it just slows to a crawl (400ks or so).
Load on both the server and the client are very low and MySQL is
working like a champ.
Seth Miller wrote:
I'm having some issues with backups taking a really long time. I can
get 4/5 mbs transfer until I hit about 1.5 million files or so per job
and then it just slows to a crawl (400ks or so).
Load on both the server and the client are very low and MySQL is
working like
On Nov 12, 2007 5:59 PM, Seth Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having some issues with backups taking a really long time. I can
get 4/5 mbs transfer until I hit about 1.5 million files or so per job
and then it just slows to a crawl (400ks or so).
Load on both the server and
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:24:34 -0600, Michael Short wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:24:34 -0600, Michael Short wrote:
I'm getting something really strange when backing up a few of my
clients, can anyone explain why the batch insert is causing my jobs to
fail?
well, actually i encountered a
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:12:21 +0100, Markus Schweitzer wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version
1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a configure, make, make install to the
location of my 1.38.11 as recommended in the manual. After that, I have
upgraded the
one o clock in the evening. backup is starting.
Actually this is 1:00AM, but I understand your confusion.
2007-11-11 01:00:01 secnet-def JobId 4836: Created new Volume
sv253429 in catalog.
2007-11-11 01:00:01 secnet-def JobId 4836: Using Device sv25d1
2007-11-11 00:36:48
I too am trying to get DVD burning working, following Richard
Mortimer's tricks and tips page.
I've been able to get a job of about 65 MB to write to DVD OK. The
problem I'm having is
with a job that's about 9 GB. As you can see I set the SpoolDirectory
to /tmp/backup,
but I don't have 9 GB
Hi!
Markus Falb schrieb:
try restarting the daemons.
Thank you for your answer.
I have tried to restart the daemons then I have rebooted the server but
there is no change.
Markus.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
hi,
how fast does your windows bacula-fd daemon backup to a linux server?
Our backup to disk is (300GB of files) running at 4 MB/s over a gigabit
connection (GZIP compressed at default compression level and also tested
a crossover connection). Seems to be slow dosn't it? Is there any way to
49 matches
Mail list logo
