Of course if badmin had been the winner then there would have had to be a
command called ton.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Langille
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 11:39 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: [EMAIL
Priority Name Number
=
13
27
34
=
Actual names
3 - badmin
7 - bat (Bacula Admin Tool)
4 - bgui
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
Amazingly, apt-file search bin/bat doesn't return any conflicts for that name.
Also, bac (Bacula Admin
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:35, James Harper wrote:
Kidding aside, how about Batula?
Or how about bob (Backup Orchestrator for Bacula)?
I like palindromes. :-P
wt
--
Warren Turkal
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
Amazingly, apt-file search bin/bat doesn't return any conflicts for that name.
Also, bac (Bacula Admin
Thanks for the explanation. :) At least the argument makes sense now,
although I don't believe the
reserved word status would prevent something like BAT.EXE from
peacefully living on a modern
Windows box.
Because BAT is a MSDOS reserved word, along with COM, LPR, CON, etc
Those reserved words
Because BAT is a MSDOS reserved word, along with COM, LPR, CON, etc
Those reserved words have been grandfathered into Windows systems.
Thanks for the explanation. :) At least the argument makes sense now,
although I don't believe the
reserved word status would prevent something like
On 20 Jan 2007 at 12:42, Alan Gerber wrote:
Priority Name Number
=
14
2 3
3 7
For reference
=
4bgui
3badmin
7bat (Bacula Admin Tool)
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 09:52, MaxxAtWork wrote:
On 1/17/07, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VanHelsing did spring to mind - A tool to tame Bacula :)
Garlic, anyone? 8-)
My vote is for bat, with bacon as second choice.
However, I think Garlic would be a good name for a
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:37, James Harper wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
Amazingly, apt-file search bin/bat
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:15:51 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:37, James Harper wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:50, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:15:51 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:37, James Harper wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:50, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:15:51 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:37, James Harper wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 12:35, James Harper wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:50, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:15:51 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:37, James Harper wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 1/16/07, James Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
Amazingly, apt-file search bin/bat
Batula is good. Bat isn't - and is unusable on MS-based systems in any case.
I'll bite. Why is bat unusable on MS systems? I haven't heard
anyone propose using .bat
as an extension, which would certainly be a bad idea, but I don't
know of any MS system programs
that go by the name of
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:58, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 13:37, you wrote:
Btw, are there any open source voting packages? I'm not sure if Kern is
going to open this to a vote or just pick the name he likes the most,
but counting votes
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 15:13, Alan Gerber wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:58, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 13:37, you wrote:
Btw, are there any open source voting packages? I'm not sure if Kern is
going to open this to a vote
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Peter Buschman wrote:
Batula is good. Bat isn't - and is unusable on MS-based systems in any
case.
I'll bite. Why is bat unusable on MS systems?
Because BAT is a MSDOS reserved word, along with COM, LPR, CON, etc
Those reserved words have been grandfathered into
Thanks for the explanation. :) At least the argument makes sense now,
although I don't believe the
reserved word status would prevent something like BAT.EXE from
peacefully living on a modern
Windows box.
Because BAT is a MSDOS reserved word, along with COM, LPR, CON, etc
Those reserved words
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Would be cool if the toolkit could be exchangeable ;)
If I am not mistaken Qt stuff runs under Gnome and GTK stuff runs under KDE.
I'm not clear on the nuances whether Qt runs on GTK based window managers or
what.
It does but right now I don't run any Qt app because
Onsdag 17 januar 2007 18:32, skrev Oliver Lehmann:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Would be cool if the toolkit could be exchangeable ;)
If I am not mistaken Qt stuff runs under Gnome and GTK stuff runs under
KDE. I'm not clear on the nuances whether Qt runs on GTK based window
managers or what.
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
# bat
At 17:37 16.1.2007, Mike wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Kern Sibbald might have said:
Hello,
Quite awhile ago, I wrote the email that is
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:20, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:32, Peter Buschman wrote:
Bacula Admin Tool (B.A.T)
Yes, that is by far the best one I have heard. :-)
Amazingly, apt-file search bin/bat doesn't return any conflicts for
that
name.
Also, bac
VanHelsing did spring to mind - A tool to tame Bacula :)
Garlic, anyone? 8-)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on
On 1/17/07, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VanHelsing did spring to mind - A tool to tame Bacula :)
Garlic, anyone? 8-)
My vote is for bat, with bacon as second choice.
However, I think Garlic would be a good name for a subproject
wrt interfacing Bacula with the outside world
(Python
Hello,
Thanks for the input. I've taken everything you wrote into consideration and
taken a look at fwbuilder as well.
Regards,
Kern
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:58, Julián Hernández Gómez wrote:
Hi Kern!
I'm +1 on the choose of QT as the primary framework for developing the
bacula GUI.
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:58, Julián Hernández Gómez wrote:
Hi Kern!
I'm +1 on the choose of QT as the primary framework for developing the
bacula GUI. But I strongly suggest to use QT4 (4.2) from the beginning
and save everybody from the pain of a later migration.
Thanks for the advice.
Hi Kern!
Less portable? I think that QT4 runs on all platforms that QT3 does
and respect with the availability QT4 has been already packaged for
multiple distros [0].
Another example of the QT4 portability is Krash (the first development
snapshot of KDE4) [1], it uses a preview of QT4.2 and
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Well, I probably didn't explicitly state it in my email, but yes, this is a
project I would like to do, but I certainly don't mean to discourage any
other GUI. In fact, part of the goal is to create a new Bacula API that this
GUI will use. The API should be usable by
I'll volunteer to help with a Python API design and testing as
well. Being able to perform command-and-control
functions as well as simple backup and recovery of objects opens up
lots and lots of possibilities.
I'm not sure how complex the Bacula protocols are, but if we can
manage to
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:30, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Well, I probably didn't explicitly state it in my email, but yes, this is
a
project I would like to do, but I certainly don't mean to discourage any
other GUI. In fact, part of the goal is to create a new
On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:28, Jo wrote:
Kern Sibbald schreef:
Hello,
As I previously wrote, working on a GUI solution is now one of my top
priorities. We have discussed the problems and possible solutions for
getting a good GUI interface for Bacula a number of times. I've
Hi Kern!
I'm +1 on the choose of QT as the primary framework for developing the
bacula GUI. But I strongly suggest to use QT4 (4.2) from the beginning
and save everybody from the pain of a later migration.
I also recommends you reconsider the PyQT option, because it's a
really good option and
On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:07, Peter L. Buschman wrote:
One of the things that is sorely missing in enterprise backup
frameworks is an embedded dynamic language.
C and C++ APIs tend to be rather inaccessible to users who find
themselves limited to which API functions
the programmer
35 matches
Mail list logo
