Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

On 5/1/24 23:32, Bill Arlofski wrote: Hello. Thank you for the status director output. It helps to confirm that my first guess of a MaximumConcurrentJobs setting was the correct one: 8<  259  Back Incr  0  0  bbb   is waiting on max Storage jobs 8< I'm still

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

On 5/1/24 9:51 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 4/29/24 19:17, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: Hello and thanks a lot for your time and attention. Hello Andrea, You are welcome. :) My first guess (without seeing any logs or configurations) is that there is a `MaximumConcurrentJobs` set

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

On 4/29/24 19:17, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users wrote: Hello and thanks a lot for your time and attention. My first guess (without seeing any logs or configurations) is that there is a `MaximumConcurrentJobs` setting set to low causing the bottleneck. I don't think so, otherwise it would

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

On 4/28/24 8:23 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: However, my most important question was: given I configured a single SD with three different HDD-based storage, is it normal that one of them can get stuck (with clients on the affected VLAN all "waiting on Storage "), while the others are working

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

On 4/27/24 11:16, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new problems to solve and using 15.x for the first time, so I'm not sure if I'm doing things wrong or if Bacula is misbehaving. ... Thanks to all that answered. I'll reply h

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

FdStorageAddress: sd.a.mydomain.it; (config on dir.conf) My case: LAN1 Server 192.168.5.0/24 (DIR, SD-TS3200-LAN1, FD-LAN1+N1) LAN2 Server192.168.7.0/24 (SD-TS3200-LAN2, FD-LAN2+N1) My SD have 2 interfaces 192.168.5.5 (eth1) and 192.168.7.5 (eth0) On Server of LAN2. add cli

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

Why don't you have a single machine name, i.e. sd.mydomain.it, but resolving to a different IP address depending on the network you're in? Le 27 avril 2024 11:16:59 GMT+02:00, Andrea Venturoli a écrit : >Hello. > >I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new >proble

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

https://www.bacula.org/7.0.x-manuals/en/main/New_Features_in_7_0_0.html Best Regards Pedro Create your WiseStamp email signature [image: __tpx__] ‌ P

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

Please could you check the configuration directive fdstorageaddress in the client Create your WiseStamp email signature [image: __tpx__] ‌ Andrea Ventu

[Bacula-users] Multiple interfaces for storage daemon

Hello. I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new problems to solve and using 15.x for the first time, so I'm not sure if I'm doing things wrong or if Bacula is misbehaving. First problem: clients are spread across three different VLANS. While I only have one