Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Hi, I think it shouldn't be considered a bug becuase the bacula manual mentions it (configure options: --enable-bat If you have Qt4 = 4.2 installed on your computer including the libqt4 and libqt4-devel (libqt4-dev on Debian) libraries, and you want to use the Bacula Administration Tool (bat)

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Hi, The bug is related to the fact that 'make install' installs everything (bat.conf, etc.) except the executable. If this truly is the authors intent, the bug is in the documentation. Regards, Clint On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, belen wrote: Hi, I think it shouldn't be considered a bug becuase

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The bug is related to the fact that 'make install' installs everything (bat.conf, etc.) except the executable. If this truly is the authors intent, the bug is in the documentation. Something is definately wrong. It is correct that BAT is found in

[Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate doesn't find it. The configure program exits with return

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate doesn't find it. Did you

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

I believe its a bug...It happened with me too while installaing Bacula 2.2.6 using tarball. Finally, i had to install bat rpm for my distribution (CentOS 5) seperately after downloading the same from sourceforge.. Regards Rupen Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

belen wrote: El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió: Hi, My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat [snip] Thanks a lot. I thought that was source but I see now that it actually IS the program. It makes me a

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and locate doesn't find

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió: Hi, My install directory is bacula-2.2.7 and the directory of bat is bacula-2.2.7/src/qt-console/bat Erik P. Olsen wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

Erik P. Olsen wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Erik P. Olsen wrote: I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not in the install directory and

Re: [Bacula-users] Where did BAT go?

I saw this as well on 2.2.6, but didn't file a bug report on it (sorry.) You could file a bug report for the next guy... Clint On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Erik P. Olsen wrote: belen wrote: El Miércoles, 30 de Enero de 2008 14:45, Dan Langille escribió: Hi, My install directory is bacula-2.2.7