On Jan 29, 2008 10:56 AM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you try on that box connecting to bacula via bconsole?
>
> Well, bconsole connect without problems. Now how I can start Bacula when
> server restart I mean like a real daemon as MySQL or PostgreSQL do?
>
I am not sure
> Did you try on that box connecting to bacula via bconsole?
Well, bconsole connect without problems. Now how I can start Bacula when server
restart I mean like a real daemon as MySQL or PostgreSQL do?
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
Grupo de Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica IP
---
On Jan 29, 2008 10:16 AM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I stop bacula-dir and try again and this are the results:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/bacula# /etc/bacula/bacula-ctl-dir stop
> Stopping the Bacula Director daemon
> gsdserver-dir: jcr.c:171-0 write_last_jobs seek to 188
>
Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica IP
> -Mensaje original-
> De: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: martes, 29 de enero de 2008 3:54 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> On J
On Jan 29, 2008 9:47 AM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John and thanks again:
> I reinstall Bacula from zero compiling the latest 2.2.8 version and you're
> right the init script are in /etc/bacula dir. Also I run the command you
> suggest me and see the output:
>
>
> ~#/etc/
martes, 29 de enero de 2008 12:32 am
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira; Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> I finished installing bacula from source today on a fresh os install.
> I started postgresql and then started the bacula install
>
&
I finished installing bacula from source today on a fresh os install.
I started postgresql and then started the bacula install
Next, I configured bacula-2.2.7 for postgres and installed it from source:
./configure --with-postgresql
make
make install
steps I found that all the scripts are placed
ez Mira
> CC: Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 5:21 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, shouldn't?
> >
> It would have been better to copy the init.d scripts because
> they ten
On Jan 24, 2008 5:21 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, shouldn't?
>
It would have been better to copy the init.d scripts because they tend
to be distro specific and place them back after the install from
source (possibly modifying them to account for the path change). I
belie
unto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 5:14 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Soury I forgot that part. Yes, I delete every files that looks like
> > and then configure again and compile from zero
> >
>
On Jan 24, 2008 5:20 PM, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 5:14 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Soury I forgot that part. Yes, I delete every files that looks like and
> > then configure again and compile from zero
> >
> So you deleted the /etc/init.d
On Jan 24, 2008 5:14 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Soury I forgot that part. Yes, I delete every files that looks like and then
> configure again and compile from zero
>
So you deleted the /etc/init.d files as well?
John
-
ueves, 24 de enero de 2008 11:12 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> > Well aparently now it compile fine but I can't find now the daemon
> > under /etc/init.d/. Where is suppose that Bacul
> Well aparently now it compile fine but I can't find now the daemon under
> /etc/init.d/. Where is suppose that Bacula puts this file? Also see the date
> now
Please explain what you just did. Did you uninstall the distro package
or delete the bacula files in /usr/sbin?
John
--
: Ryan Novosielski
> CC: Dan Langille; Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> > To be fair here, it is not always obvious. If you are not using
> > something like Debian that has a configure step that will
> pop up and
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
>> To be fair here, it is not always obvious. If you are not using
>> something like Debian that has a configure step that will pop up and ask
>> you questions, once you install, it is not clear what to do next. This
>> is especial
> To be fair here, it is not always obvious. If you are not using
> something like Debian that has a configure step that will pop up and ask
> you questions, once you install, it is not clear what to do next. This
> is especially true if the installation of the package does not build the
> database
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 2008 4:23 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
The date changes from 22/01 to 24/o1 (today) but when I start the daemon
the same error come up. See
On Jan 24, 2008 4:33 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, It haven't any output. If I do make uninstall how I'm sure that Bacula
> doesn't exists any more?
>
My guess here is you once installed a package from your distro and
that does not get removed with make uninstall because
John Drescher wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:23 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
>>> The date changes from 22/01 to 24/o1 (today) but when I start the daemon
>>> the same error come up. See the error below
>>>
>>> # /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
>>> Starting
: jueves, 24 de enero de 2008 10:31 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:29 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well this is true, still with the same date bu
On Jan 24, 2008 4:29 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well this is true, still with the same date but why?
>
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 675600 2007-10-14 22:46 /usr/sbin/bacula-dir
My guess is the make install put bacula-dir in a different folder.
Does it have any output during
; Enviado el: jueves, 24 de enero de 2008 10:25 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:19 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The date changes from 22/0
Mira
Grupo de Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica IP
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Dan Langille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de enero de 2008 10:24 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: John Drescher; Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacu
On Jan 24, 2008 4:23 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
> > The date changes from 22/01 to 24/o1 (today) but when I start the daemon
> > the same error come up. See the error below
> >
> > # /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
> > Starting Bacula Director: 24-ene
On Jan 24, 2008 4:19 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The date changes from 22/01 to 24/o1 (today) but when I start the daemon the
> same error come up. See the error below
>
I thought the previous date was (2007-10-14) from your previous email:
# ls -al /usr/sbin/bacula-dir
>
Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
> The date changes from 22/01 to 24/o1 (today) but when I start the daemon the
> same error come up. See the error below
>
> # /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
> Starting Bacula Director: 24-ene 16:25 bacula-dir: Fatal error: Could not
> open Catalog "MyCatalog", data
Pérez Mira
Grupo de Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica IP
> -Mensaje original-
> De: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de enero de 2008 8:14 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira; Bacula Users
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not r
On Jan 24, 2008 2:06 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John, I run the command and see the result:
>
> ==>Entering directory /data/Bacula/bacula-2.2.7/src/findlib
> make[1]: se ingresa al directorio `/data/Bacula/bacula-2.2.7/src/findlib'
> Make of findlib is good
>
>
Hi John, I run the command and see the result:
==>Entering directory /data/Bacula/bacula-2.2.7/src/findlib
make[1]: se ingresa al directorio `/data/Bacula/bacula-2.2.7/src/findlib'
Make of findlib is good
make[1]: se sale del directorio `/data/Bacula/bacula-2.2.7/src/findlib'
==>Enterin
On Jan 24, 2008 9:41 AM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I follow the step and sorprise every is old and I don't know why. See:
>
> # whereis bacula-dir
> bacula-dir: /sbin/bacula-dir /usr/sbin/bacula-dir
> /usr/share/man/man8/bacula-dir.8.gz
>
> # ls -al /usr/sbin/bacula-dir
hn Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de enero de 2008 3:04 pm
> Para: Reynier Perez Mira
> CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> > Hi John:
> > I remember a email sended by mysel
> Hi John:
> I remember a email sended by myself in wich I call for a clean Bacula
> installation but really I doesn't understand where files I need to save in
> this case. I onlye save my conf files because in there I have the
> configuration but nothing else. What I'm doing wrong then?
> Cheer
t; Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-director not running, why?
>
> > I noticed this too but known't why happen this. Before
> compile && install the new Bacula I follow this steps:
> > 1. Run the same bacula configure command for old: ./configure
> > --enab
> I noticed this too but known't why happen this. Before compile && install the
> new Bacula I follow this steps:
> 1. Run the same bacula configure command for old: ./configure
> --enable-bwx-console --enable-tray-monitor --with-mysql
> 2. Then make
> 3. Then make uninstall
>
> After that I chec
> > Are you sure you have the new executables installed in the
> > proper place?
>
> What you mean with "new executables"?
>
Yes. I meant are you 100% sure that the executables you compiled with
the postgresql support were installed in the same place any previous
install you may have done on the sa
> I believe it was a linux server with windows clients.
Yes you are right, is a Linux server with one Windows client.
Grupo Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
> Are you sure you have the new executables installed in the
> proper place?
What you mean with "new executables"?
Grupo Soporte al Desarrollo - Dirección Técnica
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
> Well the Debian/Ubuntu packages use sqlite3 by default, which
> packages did you install ?
I not use Ubuntu packages I compile Bacula from source. Also my configure was:
./configure --with-postgresql
Nothing more.
> I also noticed you had the following in the above output:
> bacula-dir: mysql.
> I believe it was a linux server with windows clients.
I forgot to add he is compiling from source. He had originally
compiled for mysql and now wants to use postgresql.
John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
D
> Whoops ! I should have taken more time to look over the above, it
> would appear to be a windows install ?
>
> *blush*
>
> Sorry :(
>
I believe it was a linux server with windows clients.
John
-
This SF.net email is sponsor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Brown wrote:
>>> Well I run the command and get this:
>>>
>>> /etc/bacula# bacula-dir -d 99 -t -c bacula-dir.conf
>>> bacula-dir: dird.c:152 Debug level = 99
>>> bacula-dir: inc_conf.c:526 set wilddir 80f6c20 size=1 [A-Z]:/
>>> Documents and Setti
>>
>> Well I run the command and get this:
>>
>> /etc/bacula# bacula-dir -d 99 -t -c bacula-dir.conf
>> bacula-dir: dird.c:152 Debug level = 99
>> bacula-dir: inc_conf.c:526 set wilddir 80f6c20 size=1 [A-Z]:/
>> Documents and Settings/*/Application Data/*/Profiles/*/*/Cache
>> bacula-dir: inc_conf
On Jan 23, 2008 8:37 AM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had a similar problem on Ubuntu (Debian based) and it was
> > down to a user and group permissions error, in the end I
> > found that the /var/log/ bacula dir was not owned by the
> > correct group and just failed to start
>
> Well I run the command and get this:
>
> /etc/bacula# bacula-dir -d 99 -t -c bacula-dir.conf
> bacula-dir: dird.c:152 Debug level = 99
> bacula-dir: inc_conf.c:526 set wilddir 80f6c20 size=1 [A-Z]:/
> Documents and Settings/*/Application Data/*/Profiles/*/*/Cache
> bacula-dir: inc_conf.c:526 s
> I had a similar problem on Ubuntu (Debian based) and it was
> down to a user and group permissions error, in the end I
> found that the /var/log/ bacula dir was not owned by the
> correct group and just failed to start without any output.
>
> In the init script you probably have something lik
Hi Reynier,
>> You'll get more information from doing a:
>>
>> [pathto]/bacula-dir -t -c [pathto]bacula-dir.conf
>>
>> What does that say?
>
> Nothing, it just run Ok and withouth any errors.
Try adding the debug option
i.e [pathto]/bacula-dir -d 99 -t -c [pathto]bacula-dir.conf
I had a similar
Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
> Hi every:
> I try to run Bacula but it doesn't start and I known't why. I do:
>
> ~/etc/init.d/bacula-director start
> Starting Bacula Director: bacula-dir
Possibly a database connection issue. Look in that bacula-director
file, find the command it's running, and is
> You'll get more information from doing a:
>
> [pathto]/bacula-dir -t -c [pathto]bacula-dir.conf
>
> What does that say?
Nothing, it just run Ok and withouth any errors.
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
-
This SF.net email is sp
Hi every:
I try to run Bacula but it doesn't start and I known't why. I do:
~/etc/init.d/bacula-director start
Starting Bacula Director: bacula-dir
and aparently all it's fine. This are my conf files for Director and BConsole:
bacula-dir.conf
50 matches
Mail list logo
