I have received a response back from Adaptec about block-size and tape
drives.
All of their controllers have a hard-limit of 256KB. This is an
undocumented limit it appears...
On 12/23/2016 05:05 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 22/12/16 17:49, Drew Von Spreecken wrote:
>> Thank you Alan for the
On 22/12/16 17:49, Drew Von Spreecken wrote:
> Thank you Alan for the detailed response.
>
> I was unaware of the GPL violations, this is an issue for me and it
> will be removed promptly.
>
> The block size I am aiming for was 512KB-1MB and have done extensive
> research on tuning. This should
Andrew, I will try this tomorrow. Thank you,drewv--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training
Hi Drew,
Try installing IBM's tape driver rather than the default one in the
Linux kernel. I have a LTO4 half-height SAS drive and it made a
difference in transfer speeds for me.
Andrew
On 12/22/2016 12:49 PM, Drew Von Spreecken wrote:
> Thank you Alan for the detailed response.
>
> I was
Thank you Alan for the detailed response.
I was unaware of the GPL violations, this is an issue for me and it will
be removed promptly.
The block size I am aiming for was 512KB-1MB and have done extensive
research on tuning. This should also of course be within specification
of bacula-sd.
On 22/12/16 14:31, Drew Von Spreecken wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have run into an issue and am looking for input. I have a SAS tape
> autoloader with an IBM HH-LTO6 drive running the newest firmware.
> It is currently connected to a Adaptec 78165 HBA/Raid controller via SAS.
The maximum block
Larrybwoy> Thanks for the replies and good advice. The reason I
Larrybwoy> thought of this backup plan is because what I need to back
Larrybwoy> up are multiple dynamic file systems from abut 20
Larrybwoy> servers. These file systems contain data that is always
Larrybwoy> changing since they
On 2015-12-02 7:25 am, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:29:53PM -0600, dweimer wrote:
>>
>> I will do some more test restores to the client now that its up, to
>> see
>> if its only when restoring to the freebsd client. I have verified
>> restores to the FreeBSD client of
On 05/21/2015 10:23 am, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Thursday, May 21, 2015 09:06:41 AM +0200 Kern Sibbald
k...@sibbald.com wrote:
Bacula does keep 64 bit addresses.
Excellent. Not surprisingly, I'm not dealing with file sizes near
2^63,
but I *do* need to back up files that are in the 2^39
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:14:25 +0100
Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com wrote:
Hello, Kern! Thank you for explanation.
And - yes, I do know the difference between may not and not =)
It is a bit strange - at the moment of error bacula knows what job
is being running but the only warning is in log-file.
On Wednesday, 16 June 2010 07:48:22 +1200,
richard wrote:
Alan Brown wrote:
A standalone single port SAS card isn't very expensive. It's worth
trying to see if this is a driver issue.
I can vouch for this controller, running an LTO4 drive:
Simplify the configure script. You have everything and the kitchen sink
(passwords) specified.
Mehma
===
2010/2/7 List Man list@bluejeantime.com
I have tried several time to install bacula 5.0.0 on a brand new server
and I keep getting this linking error for static-bacula-sd. I don’t
Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net kirjoitti viestissä
news:hfjoo9$ks...@ger.gmane.org...
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org...
timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes:
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
...
Yes, but
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org...
timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes:
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
...
Yes, but that's what I'm trying to avoid. I realise that I MUST have
sufficient
space really for
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:20091206082523.ga...@mad06.wl0.org...
Hello,
I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and trying to get
a working TimeMachine type configuration working.
That is I'd like to configure bacula to store to an external hard disk
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:m3aaxw15sz@mad06.wl0.org...
timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes:
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:20091206082523.ga...@mad06.wl0.org...
Hello,
I've been using Bacula for some time for home use, and
Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 13:04 +0200, Arno Lehmann a écrit :
Which user does the SD run as?
bacula-sd runs as 'bacula' user :
burp:/etc/bacula# ps x aux|grep sd
bacula 19313 0.0 0.0 89768 2292 ?Ssl 06:17
0:00 /usr/sbin/bacula-sd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf -u bacula -g tape
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Hi Dan,
a hard link looks like the original file. So it always should have the
same date.
Below you will see that the hard link (second line) has the same date at
the original file.
I created the hard link today but it also has the date from november
Hi Dan,
a hard link looks like the original file. So it always should have the
same date.
Below you will see that the hard link (second line) has the same date at
the original file.
I created the hard link today but it also has the date from november the
23th.
Ingo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Ingo Jochim wrote:
I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while
I do
the backup the files can get deleted by someone else.
The problem is
Dan Langille schrieb:
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Ingo Jochim wrote:
I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do
the backup the files can get deleted by someone
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Ingo Jochim wrote:
I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that
C M Reinehr schrieb:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Ingo Jochim wrote:
I
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote:
C M Reinehr schrieb:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
C M Reinehr schrieb:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote:
C M Reinehr schrieb:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote:
Dan Langille schrieb:
Reply has been rearranged to retain chronological order.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM,
Thanks Alan and John
Network backups is a possibility, we have an excellent network, I'm just
looking for the most efficient solution.
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Alan
Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, John Drescher wrote:
Bacula sends the data directly from the filedaemon on each
Brad Peterson wrote:
Hey all,
I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've
decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to
follow the manual (
http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html ), and
when I ran my rpmbuild command,
Brad Peterson wrote:
Hristo Benev wrote:
Brad Peterson wrote:
Hey all,
I'm getting stuck trying to install bacula 2.0.0 on a fc5 box. I've
decided to try the rpm method of installation this time. I tried to
follow the manual (
I can also give you an ls output of /home/bacula/server-prod where
INC-server-prod.18 is stored :
-rw-r- 1 bacula-sd bacula 6.9G Dec 14 01:34 INC-server-prod.18
Is there a permission problem ?
Regards.
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 17:08, Arnaud Mombrial a écrit :
Hi,
Here is the output
Sorry for this post.
Don't take care of it.
Regards
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 17:28, Arnaud Mombrial a écrit :
I can also give you an ls output of /home/bacula/server-prod where
INC-server-prod.18 is stored :
-rw-r- 1 bacula-sd bacula 6.9G Dec 14 01:34 INC-server-prod.18
Is there
Hello,
On 12/7/2006 8:11 AM, Brad Peterson wrote:
I'm trying to set up disk volumes and have them automatically labeled.
According to the manual, this should be possible.
It definitely is.
So I made sure my storage daemon had this line in it:
Label media = yes; # lets
Le lundi 4 décembre 2006 15:17, John Drescher a écrit :
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 4, 2006 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] How to understand this error
To: Arnaud Mombrial [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid Things go wrong with my
How to know a job is ended ?
Is there a way to tell Bacula to use a compression something for the tape,
since they are 1.300 Gbytes capable ?
If you are putting more than 500 GB on a tape compression is definitely on.
So the question
is why don't you get 1.3 TB? The answer is that the drive
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:04, Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Jul 2006 at 23:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I'm not really too thrilled about finding, installing, and learning how
to use another spam filter.
I use spamassassin, clamav, and postfix. I wouldn't have to learn
another.
Yes, well all
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want
to
subscribe to lists even to get help
If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do something as
simple as subscribe to a free mailing list to receive
Hello,
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 09:37, Matthew Hawkins wrote:
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't
want to subscribe to lists even to get help
If you got software for free, and you can't even be bothered to do
Kern Sibbald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, everyone is entitled to his opinion.
And thanks to the internet, we can all express it ;)
In my case, it is not that I cannot be bothered to subscribe as you seem
suggest. This should be obvious from the amount of time and effort I put into
tir, 17,.05.2005 kl. 11.50 +0200, skrev Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
users
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is:
- Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be
subscriber only.
- Nightly purge all email held for
Kern,
I vote for the subscriber only list.
Generally speaking I do not subscribe to lists due to all the volume,
but this seems like a pretty good lists, I have gotten many more
questions resolved just by being subscribed, than posting to the forums
and checking every few days or so.
In this case
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
Can't you just set 'generic_nonmember_action' to 'reject'? That's what I
do with my mailman lists. It just rejects emails from non-subscribers
without administrative
Henry Yen wrote:
The two opposing positions are:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
(including mailman's default settings) very much favor the first of the
Hello,
I get a good number of requests to change the list behavior to mung the
Reply-To. It might perhaps help me avoid getting two copies of most emails I
send that get answered, and help those that forget to use the Respond to
all, but as the first of the articles points out, it can create
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 16:36, Jo wrote:
Henry Yen wrote:
The two opposing positions are:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
(including mailman's
On Monday 09 May 2005 21:16, David Clymer wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:01 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 16:43, Alan Brown wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote:
Can we PLEASE have the list switched to
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Prior to having a spam filter I'd found that pressing the delete key works
pretty well and amazingly fast.
The dangers of deleting legitimate mail unread should be obvious.
As are the dangers of having any filter which accepts then dumps mail, or
tags it
On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote:
Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only?
I don't see any SPAM because I use a Bayesian filter. However, I'll be happy
to switch to members only posting, *provided* that someone can show me how to
make the Source Forge Mailman
On Monday 09 May 2005 16:43, Alan Brown wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 14:11, Alan Brown wrote:
Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only?
I don't see any SPAM because I use a Bayesian filter.
Perhaps the Bayesian filter should be
man, 09,.05.2005 kl. 13.11 +0100, skrev Alan Brown:
Can we PLEASE have the list switched to members-posting only?
That would be very nice (considering recent events). :p
- Christopher
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy
49 matches
Mail list logo