> On Friday, October 27, Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'd suggest is this: go ahead with the zips-as-strings conversion
so should we take the opportunity to change the term "zip code" to
"postal code"?
(just in consideration of the fact that most countries have postal codes
Sridhar Boovaraghavan writes:
> George Hartzell writes:
> > vm support seems to be broken for me now though. Whenever I use ":"
> > to show a person's record, all I get is "unperson". I've traced
> > through the lisp a bit, and I have feeling that there's something
> > funny going on wh
I'm living on the bleeding edge with a number of packages, and I
confess that I'm not very eager to add BBDB to this list. I'd like to
use a stable version.
That said, 2.2 has been around for a while now. And I think using
2.2 will help with syncing with a Palm, and all my colleages (and I)
hav
George Hartzell writes:
> vm support seems to be broken for me now though. Whenever I use ":"
> to show a person's record, all I get is "unperson". I've traced
> through the lisp a bit, and I have feeling that there's something
> funny going on when pulling the named/keys from the message, s
pf> I took a totally different approach; I decided that I wanted
pf> someone in my bbdb if I replied to their email. So, as a gnus
pf> user, I did this:
"Me, too." If anyone is interested in seeing the equivalent for VM,
drop me a line.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter)PGP 0x91865119
38 9
I'm using
"This is VM 6.71."
and
"BBDB version 2.2 ($Date: 2000/09/08 15:10:03 $)"
in
Xemacs 21.1.
I've been using bbdb for a *long* time, and recently clawed my way up
to bbdb2.2 so that I could sync. with my palm.
vm support seems to be broken for me now though. Whenever I use ":"
to
On Friday, October 27 2000 05:08:32, Paul Franklin wrote:
> I took a totally different approach; I decided that I
> wanted someone in my bbdb if I replied to their email.
> So, as a gnus user, I did this:
This is a very nice idea, especially for news (actually I
know this feature from Outlook. Wi
On October 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Before doing any more work BBDB related work, I'd like to see this
> issue settled. Personally, I'm in favour of the first solution,
> obviously. However, in order to do away with the uncertainty, I'd be
> happy with any decision at all. So, dear maintai
