On January 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do I have a wrong tarball?
Probably. The release version was bbdb-2.20.tar.gz, which was a bit
silly of me, but I was trying to adhere to the existing release
numbering. I suppose it should really have been 2.02!
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7 Shevat 5761, Arne Jrgensen wrote:
From time to time I receive mails from people who have not configured
a real name in their MUA. The result is a ugly summary-buffer containg
lines with things like [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] and then I have to
guess/remember (same thing) who [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Arne Jrgensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From time to time I receive mails from people who have not configured
a real name in their MUA. The result is a ugly summary-buffer containg
lines with things like [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] and then I have to
guess/remember (same thing) who [EMAIL
Alf-Ivar Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Start digging at `bbdb/gnus-summary-prefer-real-names'.
I just upgraded and started using the new BBDb, and configured the
feature you wanted: You have to change the "%a"
gnus-summary-line-format to "%uB", so I've got the following in my
.gnus:
I've just upgraded to BBDB 2.2. It seems to be working fine, except
for the following problem when using VM:
When I invoke vm-next-message in the VM summary buffer, I am
accustomed to seeing the next message preview (I have vm-preview-lines
set to "t"). I don't like to see the bbdb record, so
"Arne Jrgensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not exactly. Because if I receive a mail with the header
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The TeX junkie)
I don't want to have the real name rewritten to "Arne Jrgensen"
(because this is how it appears in the BBDB). I _only_ want to rewrite
the
