Re: bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, david x. callaway wrote: > vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc > instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this > setup? That's a really *bad* idea, no matter what. The *compiled* elisp is not going to be the same acro

Re: "posting-style" depending on bbdb info

> "Michael" == Michael Totschnig writes: [...] Michael> I have something like ((boundp 'bbdb-record) (eval Michael> (do-something-with (bbdb-record-getprop bbdb-record Michael> 'field-name Michael> as part of my gnus-posting-styles. [...] That's interesting. Could I have som

bbdb-2.32 and vm.elc binary install

vm has for some while been distributed (optionally) as a single vm.elc instead of individual lisp files. can bbdb be made to build with this setup? thanks dxc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page:

Re: "posting-style" depending on bbdb info

Ami Fischman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Just started using BBDB (2.32) with Gnus 5.8.8 and emacs 20.7.1. My main > goal for using bbdb is being able to automatically set certain header info > based on bbdb data (so, each of my records contains a > personal/business/other type field, and

Re: BBDB 2.32 and VM : `no insinuation ?'

On August 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > "Waider" == Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Waider> At Thursday, 30 August 2001, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ethz.ch> wrote: > >> Well, I call > >> (bbdb-initialize 'vm 'sc 'w3 'sendmail 'rmail) > >> from my ~/

SUpport for multiple display layouts

Hi, I have just committed a rewritten version of the bbdb-format-record-* functions. The "look&feel" of the different layouts and be configured by the variables bbdb-display-layout-alist, which lists options for the specific layout, e.g. field order, omited fields, toggeling,... and the variable

Re: BBDB 2.32 and VM : `no insinuation ?'

Waider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right, well, I think the latter may cause you problems. The latter > should be bbdb-insinuate-vm. bbdb-initialize does /not/ invoke the > insinuation stuff because we don't know if VM's variables are > available at bbdb-init time. Is there a reason for not re

Re: BBDB 2.32 and VM : `no insinuation ?'

> "Waider" == Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Waider> At Thursday, 30 August 2001, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ethz.ch> wrote: >> Well, I call >> (bbdb-initialize 'vm 'sc 'w3 'sendmail 'rmail) >> from my ~/.emacs equivalent... >> *AND* >> (bbdb-initi