Re: Support for multiple display layouts

2001-09-05 Thread Alex Schroeder
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> One question: The default value here contains "phones" instead of >> "phone" -- does that work? > > Yes, since it maps to a function bbdb-record- in > order to get the field content. Ah... Well in that case there is problem with the defaults provid

Re: bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Robert Fenk
On , September 5 2001 13:42:10, Doug Alcorn wrote: [...] > The bbdb-auto-notes-hook was taking stuff like > Organization and adding it to all the recipients as well > as the sender. I use this as my alist: Autsch, ok now I see it. Have never used it like that before so I missed this bug, hmm I'

Re: bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Doug Alcorn
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think that this should still be the default. > > Hmm bbdb-get-only-first-address-p should have been t, > well I fix that. I guess this may be good enough. > > The current setup seems to generate a lot more complaints, > > plus it's buggy in that

Re: bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Robert Fenk
On Wednesday, September 5 2001 17:39:30, Waider wrote: [...] > Actually, the original behaviour was to only show the From: record; At least not for VM/Gnus. bbdb-vm used to take the To: header if there was no or an uninteresting From header. You are right in a sense, since now it has more fallb

Re: bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Waider
According to Robert Fenk: > > Yes this is the way it was intended in order to get the old > behavior . Actually, the original behaviour was to only show the From: record; I think that this should still be the default. The current setup seems to generate a lot more complaints, plus it's buggy in

Re: bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Robert Fenk
On , September 5 2001 11:54:21, Doug Alcorn wrote: [...] > Is this the best way to address this? I noticed the variable > bbdb-get-only-first-address-p. Would it have been better to leave > bbdb-get-addresses-header alone and just set b-g-o-f-a-p to t instead > of nil? Yes this is the way it wa

bbdb-get-addresses-headers

2001-09-05 Thread Doug Alcorn
I did a bunch of mucking with my bbdb (I know that's a terrible thing to say and not provide details, but hold on). One of the side effects (really of upgrading probably) is that the pop-up display in Gnus started showing me records for the From: and To: fields. With a little bit of direction f