On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS shortly.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
A one question geek test. If you think it's funny, you're a geek. Seen on a
California license
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS shortly.
I think, the indent parameter is used when bbdb-format-address is
called for screen formating and not for printing. So I like this
Okay, I agree with that. Thanks.
Waider. No, I don't use a printer if I can help it :)
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On November 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Small patch I needed to get bbdb-print work:
Ta. Applied, will be in CVS
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think, the indent parameter is used when bbdb-format-address is
called for screen formating and not for printing. So I like this
patch better:
Actually, on a related note.
If I feed the patch you gave me to patch:
patch gerds.patch
I get:
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Note that this is also in my patch which I sent a few days ago. The
patch added the bbdb-print-net defcustom. In order to test it, I had
to fix the same bug. :)
Mea culpa :) I have backlog of stuff here that I'm working through at
the moment, and I
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
patch gerds.patch
I get:
Waider (klortho.waider.ie) $ patch ~/tmp/bbdb/bbdb-print-patch
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
[...] Actually, from reading the manual page I get the
On November 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of course, the best would be, I call diff inside the lisp directory.
Sorry for the confusion.
Well, no. There's a way of doing this that works from the root of the
tree as well, but my reading of the patch man page leads me to believe
that you need to
