On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 22:29:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually not, as they get called from bbdb-update-records
and that one cares for slightly different parameters, i.e.
promt-for-create is set to bbdb-prompt-for-create ...
Ah. The reason I
On Monday, July 21, 2003 at 18:50:24, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
Whenever I delete a record in the database, I get the appended
message when I view another MH message.
I display the database by `M-x bbdb RET RET' I navigate to the
appropriate record with successive `n' and then I type `d
On Monday, July 21, 2003 at 19:25:08, Neil W. Van Dyke wrote:
BBDB Version: 2.35 as packaged by Debian
Emacs/XEmacs Version: GNU Emacs 21.3
Mail/News reader (Gnus, VM, etc) used: 7.17
Bug Description:
While paging through email messages in VM, `bbdb-update-records'
raises an error on
Sam == Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sam
Sam Sometimes I get a message from a mailing list with a From address like
Sam this:
Sam John Doe via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam
Sam I added a variable `bbdb-canonicalize-name-hook', similar to
Sam
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
where do you call this?
It's called in the patch he appended to his original post.
It'd be nice if mail-extract-address-components had a hook somewhere or
some regexp check for parts of the email addr to discard. Maybe there even
is a possibility, but
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What you're losing here is that rfc822.el is pretty much the
definitive emacs implementation of correct address parsing, but it's
mechanical in that it returns to you the exact name text from the
input email address. On the other hand, Robert Fenk and others
On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
Hello,
some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
/dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses as records
in my BBDB. Therefore I
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 15:00:51, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
The following defun in bbdb-sc.el seems buggy:
(defun bbdb/sc-consult-attr (from)
Extract citing information from BBDB using sc-consult where
FROM is user e-mail address to look for in BBDB.
;; if logged in user sent
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IMHO it should not return a list unless you had been setting
`bbdb-user-mail-names' to an list.
Thus I rejected making this change unless convinced of the
opposite ...
Nope, the doco for bbdb-user-mail-names clearly states it's a
regexp... good catch.
On Thursday, July 24, 2003 at 12:01:17, Robert Widhopf wrote:
On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
Hello,
some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
/dev/null. Of course I don't
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
So have a look at this an vote for it or against ...
What does your patch do that, say,
11 matches
Mail list logo
