On July 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
1) The point is: IF THERE IS ALREADY AN RECORD FOR THIS PERSON!
Ah, good point.
2) The change of bbdb-always-add-addresses's semantic allows
NOT-SO-LISP-EXPERIENCED users to utilize the same hooks as
for ignore-(some|all)-messages, i.e. all they need is
I wish when I do (bbdb bob) it would put the cursor in the bbdb
window, as my next step is to type m on the person I want. It takes
an extra C-x o at present.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data
Robert wrote:
Robert Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
Robert break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
Robert record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
Isn't is possible to keep the default behavior when the address isn't
ignored?
Yours
--
%%
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:26:58 +0100 Ronan Waide wrote:
Ronan On July 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There is bbdb-pgp.el in bbdb/bits. I use a slightly modified version
(i.e. no mailcrypt required, configurable to ask less questions...).
I am not sure how the no-mailcrypt issue should be
* Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
/dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses as
I wish there was a variable to control when I hit m, instead of
causing To: Blob Dwobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], it would make just To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], to be in line with my spartan image.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
0 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
0 Dan Jacobson URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan) wrote:
Dan I wish there was a variable to control when I hit m, instead of
Dan causing To: Blob Dwobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], it would make just To:
Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED], to be in line with my spartan image.
Be
This is probably a very simple problem. BUT... I took Vladimir's
advice to use BBDB-INITIALIZE to get things going.
When I do (bbdb-initialize 'supercite) this has the following effect:
(assq 'supercite bbdb-init-forms) =
(supercite (add-hook (quote sc-load-hook) (quote bbdb-insinuate-sc)))
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ronan Waide moaned:
One other thing that occurred to me that operates in this space is
bbdb-notice-hook.
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe due to a blockage
On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
Not to be picky about it, but I'd prefer it does or it doesn't
rather than I hear. There's enough trickiness in BBDB as it stands
without adding rumours to
10 matches
Mail list logo
