Re: bbdb-3.x docs

2014-03-11 Thread Gour
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:47:48 +0100 Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: The main documentation source for org-mode is its manual: http://orgmode.org/#docs I know about it and there is info manual within Emacs itself. and the tutorials we have on Worg: http://orgmode.org/worg/ Yeah, many useful

Re: [BBDB] version 3.1 released

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Mar 10 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: Fixed. (Replaced with @xxx@ for clarity.) I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@] instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems to be working, too. (I also saw you have several minor unrelated suggestions

Re: [BBDB] version 3.1 released

2014-03-11 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@] instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems to be working, too. To shield the regex from autoconf! --Barak. -- Learn Graph Databases

Re: bbdb-3.x docs

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Mar 10 2014 Gour wrote: I see that org-mode can use org-contacts, but I'm also curious to try BBDB-3.x hearing it's more flexible than 2.x and possibly more suitable as contacts' add-on for org-mode and Gnus' address book. I don't know to what extent org-mode has been fully updated to

Re: [BBDB] version 3.1 released

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: I am just curious:  In the sed regular expressions, you use [@] instead of plain @.  Is there a reason for this?  Plain @ seems to be working, too. To shield the regex from autoconf! But I guess this would be really needed only if

Re: More popup questions

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Mar 10 2014 Christian Lynbech wrote: However if I do a BBDB search, such that I have a *bbdb* buffer, then whenever I visit a new sender, the *BBDB* pops up displaying a record for the new sender. ...visit a new sender means what? You are reading mail with something like Gnus or Rmail,

Re: [BBDB] version 3.1 released

2014-03-11 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I am just curious: In the sed regular expressions, you use [@] instead of plain @. Is there a reason for this? Plain @ seems to be working, too. To shield the regex from autoconf! But I guess this would be really needed only if bbdb-site.el.in was actually processed by autoconf.

Re: [BBDB] version 3.1 released

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: The regex appears in Makefile.am which begets Makefile.in which is processed by the ./configure produced by autoconf, rendering the regex susceptible to @@ substitution. You are right, never mind. My testcase was too simple to reveal this

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2014-03-11

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Tue Mar 11 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: The dependency on ../config.something should cause it to be regenerated when the configuration changes. This is the mechanism automake uses for .in files processed by ./configure. One can imagine regenerating it when variables passed to make

[BBDB] ChangeLog 2014-03-11

2014-03-11 Thread Roland Winkler
On Sun Mar 9 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: Okay, I've reworked it again to satisfy, I believe, all criteria! The pathway is simply bbdb-site.el.in to bbdb-site.el. I adopted your approach, thank you. A pre-built bbdb-site.el can be included in the distribution tarball, no problem. (Might

Re: [BBDB] ChangeLog 2014-03-11

2014-03-11 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
... I think it would be good to have a pre-built bbdb-site.el included in the distribution tarball. But ideally `make' should rebuild this file whenever the user re-runs make with a new value for pkgdatadir. The dependency on ../config.something should cause it to be regenerated when the