* Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On July 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
why does BBDB (2.34) add the MID to the Reply-To-field and then even in
a broken format with stripping the M?
Can you check the CVS version (2.35) to see if this is still a problem?
Great, installing the CVS version
Hello,
why does BBDB (2.34) add the MID to the Reply-To-field and then even in
a broken format with stripping the M?
Example:
,
| reply-to: essage-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| essage-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| essage-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| essage-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Depends on your usage, so please some more votes before we
may decide to do add `bbdb-selects-window', but in the
Voting against :)
Me, too.
Personally, I use BBDB's completion if I'm sending mail. I don't want
to
* Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
/dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses
Hello,
some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
/dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses as records in
my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
'(
* Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using bbdb-define-all-aliases or bbdb-complete-name
they should be displayed anyway while inserting them (see
variable `bbdb-completion-display-record').
Just those stemming from a reply should not show up, but
they should be listed while viewing
