On Mon Oct 15 2012 Ben Sturmfels wrote:
> When install BBDBv3, I ran `./configure --prefix=/home/ben/local`
> wanting everything to be installed in under this directory (based on my
> reading of `./configure --help`).
>
> The output belows shows that .tex files default to being installed in
> /usr
Hi BBDB'ers,
Sorry if this isn't the right place to send a BBDBv3 bug report. I
couldn't find the command "bbdb-submit-bug-report" in BBDBv3. Thanks for
your work by the way, I love BBDB! :)
When install BBDBv3, I ran `./configure --prefix=/home/ben/local`
wanting ever
On , April 11, 2002 at 09:42:36, D. Goel wrote:
> my bbdb-version
> "2.32"
> (i have commented in past that "e" edits the wrong field if our fields
> happen to be multiline..)
Try the current CVS version, it should be fixed there.
> create a new field .. when it asks for address-description, typ
my bbdb-version
"2.32"
(i have commented in past that "e" edits the wrong field if our fields
happen to be multiline..)
here's another bug:
create a new field .. when it asks for address-description, type
something, but keep hitting ENTER for the actual address so that
we have an address-d
Hi
When using the original bbdb-submit-bug-report command my email get
refused by the sourceforge Server, because my from line is wrong:
It arrives as
"Uwe Brauer" >
INSTEAD of
"Uwe Brauer"
I have to use vm-mail and insert the whole bug report in this buffer.
Hi
I upgraded from bbdb-2.32 to 2.34, using xemacs-21.1.4 no mule.
Now after byte compiling the bbdb list files, I could not even *make*
a bug report, since I got the error message:
invalid function: #special-form save-current-buffers
Uwe Brauer
Emacs : XEmacs 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuy
Hi
Please disregard that bug report. It was a broken record in my
~/.bbdb (which I broke messing around with xfaces).
Please accept my apologies, I have a baby girl who thinks that Daddy
shouldn't get any sleep. :-(
--
|-|
|XEmacs - It's not just
On June 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I needed the following patch to handle the case where there were two
> matching records in the database and one has a string for the company but
> no name string:
I've patched this. Thanks for the bug report.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTEC
I needed the following patch to handle the case where there were two
matching records in the database and one has a string for the company but
no name string:
*** bbdb.el 2001/06/25 06:16:11 1.1
--- bbdb.el 2001/06/25 06:20:19
***
*** 1634,1642
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Michael Matson wrote:
> How about a function that searches a loaded *.tex buffer for the
> \begin{letter}{} and \opening{} fields and fills them in from the
> contents of the displayed bbdb entry? Bind it to "l" for "l"etter or
> "l"aTeX, take your pick. Perhaps *l could put
On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> BBDB Version: "BBDB version 2.3 ($Date: 2001/02/21 20:01:14 $)"
> XEmacs Version: "XEmacs 21.1 (patch 14) \"Cuyahoga Valley\" [Lucid]
> (i386--freebsd) of Thu Mar 1 2001 on duchess.twilley.org"
> Mail/News Reader: Oort Gnus v0.01
> Bug Description: traceback
On March 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> this function is defined in bbdb-sc.el, but isn't marked with an
> autoload cookie. I guess that's a bug, so I'll fix it with said
> cookie. In the meantime, you can simply (require 'bbdb-sc) as some
> part of your Gnus startup. Please check that this works
On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> BBDB Version: 2.20
> Emacs Version: 20.3-3
> Mail: Mail, for sending mail from bbdb, exmh/emacs-serv for the rest
> News: Gnus
> Bug:
>
> It seems that if bbdb-snarf or bbdb-snarf-region is called when emacs
> is first started it complains with the following
BBDB Version: "BBDB version 2.3 ($Date: 2001/02/21 20:01:14 $)"
XEmacs Version: "XEmacs 21.1 (patch 14) \"Cuyahoga Valley\" [Lucid]
(i386--freebsd) of Thu Mar 1 2001 on duchess.twilley.org"
Mail/News Reader: Oort Gnus v0.01
Bug Description: traceback when replying with yank and supercite
I just
BBDB Version: 2.20
Emacs Version: 20.3-3
Mail: Mail, for sending mail from bbdb, exmh/emacs-serv for the rest
News: Gnus
Bug:
It seems that if bbdb-snarf or bbdb-snarf-region is called when emacs
is first started it complains with the following error:
"Symbol's function definition is void: bbdb
Hello,
I just have committed a function for submitting bug reports.
You are encourage to use this new functions when reporting
problems, as it adds all the valuable bits of information to
the bug report which usually make it easier to understand
and fix bugs.
Robert
PS: I will commit "ge
On January 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> (ps - the docs say info-bbdb, not bbdb-info...)
Only in historically significant (!) places, as far as I can see...
Cheers,
Waider. Do correct me if I'm wrong.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty
Here's a backtrace I received while looking at the second of two
consecutive news articles by the same author:
Signaling: (mark-inactive)
signal(mark-inactive nil)
mark()
bbdb-redisplay-records()
byte-code("Å!p
Æq \f
Ç **" [bbdb-buffer-name b w bbdb-record
bbdb-records get-
> "ZSH" == ShengHuo ZHU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ZSH> Make sure that you've updated Gnus after September 11, and
ZSH> add the following line in your .emacs.
ZSH> (require 'gnus-msg)
The mysteries continue...
When I make your suggested change, I no longer get the error.
John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Version info:
> BBDB version 2.2
> GNU Emacs 20.7.1
> Gnus v5.8.8
>
> Description: when I execute bbdb-send-mail from the *BBDB* buffer I
> get the following message 'Symbol's function definition is void: nil'.
> The bbdb-send-mail error does not occur
Version info:
BBDB version 2.2
GNU Emacs 20.7.1
Gnus v5.8.8
Description: when I execute bbdb-send-mail from the *BBDB* buffer I
get the following message 'Symbol's function definition is void: nil'.
The bbdb-send-mail error does not occur any more after I have executed
gnus-group-mail for the
Well done, Karl, you broke bbdb!
--- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ---
From: Vapor User <>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 20:48:33 -0500
Subject: did you know that, under Linux
you can have a user named , (but funny things may happen when
that
22 matches
Mail list logo
