On Sun Jan 1 2012 Roland Winkler wrote:
On Fri Dec 30 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
If BBDB is using some hooks in the background, it can read and
modify bbdb-file (using bbdb-buffer) without ever creating the
*BBDB* buffer. So a solution could be to check for the auto-save
file only when
On Fri Dec 30 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
If BBDB is using some hooks in the background, it can read and
modify bbdb-file (using bbdb-buffer) without ever creating the
*BBDB* buffer. So a solution could be to check for the auto-save
file only when bbdb-file is actually read. Under normal
On Fri Dec 30 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-12-30 04:06:39 -0600]:
So a solution could be to check for the auto-save
file only when bbdb-file is actually read.
I think this is done automatically by emacs.
If a file has auto-save data, emacs gives you
On Thu Dec 29 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-12-29 10:54:29 -0600]:
I am still confused. Why is the current behavior not appropriate for
your needs? If BBDB detects that you have an auto-save-file that is
newer than bbdb-file, why is it not OK to save it
On Wed Dec 28 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
If I set bbdb-check-auto-save-file to t, modify the db and not save it
right away, I am asked all the time about recovering bbdb from the auto
save file.
with v2, I was asked this only when bbdb was first loaded, which was useful.
This is one of the old
On Thu Dec 29 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-12-29 02:48:14 -0600]:
On Wed Dec 28 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
If I set bbdb-check-auto-save-file to t, modify the db and not
save it right away, I am asked all the time about recovering
bbdb from the auto
