On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:52:21 +0200 David Engster wrote:
DE> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:34:15 +0200 David Engster
>> wrote:
DE> XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
DE> 21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for XEmacs
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:34:15 +0200 David Engster
> wrote:
> DE> XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
> DE> 21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for XEmacs;
> DE> just use "-L .".
>
> DE> I can set up a buildbot, but
(David, I sent you a courtesy CC but posted to the list through Gmane to
avoid the moderator delay)
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:34:15 +0200 David Engster wrote:
DE> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:16:58 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> My main concern is XEmacs support. While I am
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:16:58 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
> RW> My main concern is XEmacs support. While I am not at all opposed to
> RW> having this (re)added to BBDB, it is simply something where I do not
> RW> know about and it ranks low on my personal agenda.
>
> David
On Thu Apr 14 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:47:11 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
>
> RW> On Wed Apr 13 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> >> It should be possible to support at least Emacs 23.x and XEmacs. Gnus
> >> does it so we can look there for potential problems and solutions.
>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:47:11 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> On Wed Apr 13 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> It should be possible to support at least Emacs 23.x and XEmacs. Gnus
>> does it so we can look there for potential problems and solutions.
>>
>> You could ask David Engster , who's setting
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> It should be possible to support at least Emacs 23.x and XEmacs. Gnus
> does it so we can look there for potential problems and solutions.
>
> You could ask David Engster , who's setting up a
> Gnus buildbot, to do the same for BBDB.
>
> Also you should c
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:05:30 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
RW> I do not want to exclude any other dialects of emacs here. But they
RW> would most likely require a more systematic overhaul of all code.
RW> In that sense, I am a bit hesitant to add support for something that
RW> is not spelled out
> * Stefan Monnier [2011-04-13 13:10:15 -0300]:
>
> As for whether you need `boundp' to set a variable, I think that's not
> the case: if your Emacs doesn't obey this variable, setting it
> shouldn't do any harm (it'll just be ignored).
of course.
I just don't want to create a useless variable, t
> * Roland Winkler [2011-04-13 11:05:30 -0500]:
>
> Just curious: which dialect of emacs do you have in mind here?
your predecessor removed my cvs write permissions because he thought I
was not careful enough with support of ancient emacsen.
this is the only reason for the checks.
if you do not c
>>> + (when (boundp 'revert-buffer-function)
>>> +(setq revert-buffer-function 'bbdb-revert-buffer))
>>
>> I recommend to use (set (make-local-variable ) ) when setting
>> a buffer-local variable, even if you know that the variable is
>> automatically buffer-local. One of the benefits is tha
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * Stefan Monnier [2011-04-13 12:32:42 -0300]:
> >
> >> + (when (boundp 'revert-buffer-function)
> >> +(setq revert-buffer-function 'bbdb-revert-buffer))
> >
> > I recommend to use (set (make-local-variable ) ) when setting
> > a buffer-local variabl
> * Stefan Monnier [2011-04-13 12:32:42 -0300]:
>
>> + (when (boundp 'revert-buffer-function)
>> +(setq revert-buffer-function 'bbdb-revert-buffer))
>
> I recommend to use (set (make-local-variable ) ) when setting
> a buffer-local variable, even if you know that the variable is
> automatical
> + (when (boundp 'revert-buffer-function)
> +(setq revert-buffer-function 'bbdb-revert-buffer))
I recommend to use (set (make-local-variable ) ) when setting
a buffer-local variable, even if you know that the variable is
automatically buffer-local. One of the benefits is that you don't need
14 matches
Mail list logo
