Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On August 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> First, a bug report, sort of. I use RMAIL but almost never the RMAIL
>> summary mode. Insinuating into RMAIL causes trouble, as bbdb-insinuate-rmail
>> includes
>>
>> (define-key rmail-summary-mode-map ":" 'bbd
On August 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> First, a bug report, sort of. I use RMAIL but almost never the RMAIL
> summary mode. Insinuating into RMAIL causes trouble, as bbdb-insinuate-rmail
> includes
>
> (define-key rmail-summary-mode-map ":" 'bbdb/rmail-show-sender)
>
> among other stuff.
Let me begin by reiterating that I am thankful for anyone who invests
significant effort in maintaining bbdb.
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let me restate:
>
> I said:
>> been fixed at source. Regardless of issues of moving targets or lack
>> of resources, trying to maintain a comp
Let me restate:
I said:
> been fixed at source. Regardless of issues of moving targets or lack
> of resources, trying to maintain a complex piece of code on top of an
> unstable platform is a complete waste of time.
To which you replied:
> ...try and track down the problem, sit on it for a couple
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On August 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> I am also (personally) not thrilled with the attitude of refusing to
>> support CVS Emacs. I understand the reasoning behind it---trying to
>> catch up with a moving target plus lack of resources.
>
> My major gri
On August 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am also (personally) not thrilled with the attitude of refusing to
> support CVS Emacs. I understand the reasoning behind it---trying to
> catch up with a moving target plus lack of resources.
My major gripe with trying to support CVS Emacs (or CVS XEmacs
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On August 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> stuff. IMHO, none of this stuff should be executed in a mode hook,
>> but on load of the mode file.
>
> What you have to bear in mind is that much of this code predates
> things like advice (and possibly eval-on
On August 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> [-]
> stuff. IMHO, none of this stuff should be executed in a mode hook,
> but on load of the mode file.
What you have to bear in mind is that much of this code predates
things like advice (and possibly eval-on-load), and has not
significantly changed sinc
