On Sun Aug 12 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
OK what you are saying is v2 allows single notes string field, but
a list of cons pairs is still valid in v2, right?
Correct (to the best of my knowledge of v2)
So a v3 unmigrate features that leaves the notes field as it is
in v3 (list of cons pairs)
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
Further, throwing them away could just be stashing the fields
into the notes list.
Certainly. But if you then decide to give v3 a second try, you will
not get back what you had before.
Just for the record, can you tell us about all the changes in the
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
I would like to capture this question and a summary of your
answers as a FAQ on the updated project site on sourceforge.
Thanks a lot, that will be helpful
I have updated site (http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/) with a
On Fri Aug 10 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
I have updated site (http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/) with a note
pointing to Savannah. That done, I now feel it is best to just
leave that site alone. Any FAQ etc. should reside on the Savannah
site. Thoughts?
Thanks a lot for doing this. Two things:
-
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
Thanks a lot for doing this. Two things:
- My first name is Roland
Ah, indeed :)
- I suggest to replace the 2nd paragraph by something like the
following
I have rewritten along lines you have suggested and
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
I have rewritten along lines you have suggested and pushed it. Please take a
look.
Looks fine to me, thanks,
Backwards compatibility for me would mean a few distinct things:
1. Will my old customizations work with the new code
#1 might never get
On Sat Jul 7 2012 Johnny wrote:
By now, unless someone on this list brings up problems with BBDB v3
that remained unnoticed so far, I do not have plans to further
modify the code of BBDB (except for fixing docstrings that could
still be buggy / incomplete). In particular, I do not want to
Hi Roland,
Sorry to drag this up again, but...
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
By now, unless someone on this list brings up problems with BBDB v3
that remained unnoticed so far, I do not have plans to further
modify the code of BBDB (except for fixing docstrings that could
still be
On Thu Jun 21 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
Perhaps now is a good time for me to ask this question that's been
on my mind for a while: Apart from an extensive code cleanup, are
there any other things to look forward to with your upcoming
release? This is particularly important given the level of
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
By now, unless someone on this list brings up problems with BBDB v3 that
remained unnoticed so far, I do not have plans to further modify the code of
BBDB (except for fixing docstrings that could still be buggy /
incomplete). In particular, I do not
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
PS: I hope that in a few days I can submit my recent work on BBDB. I
just need to summarize things in the ChangeLog.
Great! Perhaps now is a good time for me to ask this question that's been
on my mind for a while: Apart
11 matches
Mail list logo
