On Thursday, February 19, 2004 at 11:31:03, Angel de Vicente wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been reading the manuals for both VM and BBDB, but I have not
> found an obvious way to do this easily. Anybody can give me a hand
> with this?
>
> Basically I just want to automatically filter all e-mail from peop
Hi,
I've been reading the manuals for both VM and BBDB, but I have not found an
obvious way to do this easily. Anybody can give me a hand with this?
Basically I just want to automatically filter all e-mail from people in my BBDB
database to one folder, and e-mail from people not in my BBDB databa
On October 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Consider using Colin Rafferty's bbdb-obsolete-net hack, which works
> wonderfully:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01827.html
>
>
> Ronan - can you put bbdb-obsolete-net.el into the distribution, please?
>
> Cheers,
On Monday, 18 March 2002, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On March 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Write a wrapper for bbdb/mail-auto-create-p, e.g.
>
> I don't think you need a wrapper, to be honest; you should be able to
> do this with an appropriate bbdb/mail-auto-create-p function - if the
> function r
On March 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Write a wrapper for bbdb/mail-auto-create-p, e.g.
I don't think you need a wrapper, to be honest; you should be able to
do this with an appropriate bbdb/mail-auto-create-p function - if the
function returns nil, the record will not be created. Thus your
func
On Friday, March 15, 2002 at 06:08:28, Albert Max Lai wrote:
> What I would like to do is to modify bbdb in such a way that addresses
> are automatically added only when the mail buffer name in vm matches a
> particular string (e.g. INBOX). This is similar to but different than
> what bbdb-ignore
What I would like to do is to modify bbdb in such a way that addresses
are automatically added only when the mail buffer name in vm matches a
particular string (e.g. INBOX). This is similar to but different than
what bbdb-ignore-most-messages-alist does. I figured out how to hack
this functional
On October 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> H. How do I 'check the integrity of [my] BBDB file'?
>
> A
With difficulty :) I'm actually suspecting you've got a compile
problem - compiled BBDB with Emacs and ran with XEmacs, or didn't have
a copy of VM source, or similar. If you really want to
Daniel Pittman wrote:
> How about allowing a list, rather than a symbol, in the binding space,
> so that I can say:
> (setq bbdb-completion-type '(primary name net aka old-net))
> Then I can express the way I search correctly: I want to match on the
> primary net address, then the real name.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> With some reprodcuible regularity, vm & bbdb complete to the *second*
>> name, rather then the primary.
>
> Bugs and suchlike aside, there is another issue here which collides
> with
On October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> With some reprodcuible regularity, vm & bbdb complete to the *second*
> name, rather then the primary.
Bugs and suchlike aside, there is another issue here which collides
with doing this 'right':
Say I have a record for myself, that l
On October 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> recall several years ago lamenting that not only could I remember
> so-and-so's name, I couldn't even recall his /email address/.
Ahem. "could I not remember". English is HARD.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"There was
On October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hi all-
>
> With some reprodcuible regularity, vm & bbdb complete to the *second*
> name, rather then the primary.
>
> According to some old postings in a thread entitled 'grave completion
> bug in bbdb 2.2', this eith
Robert Fenk writes:
> On Friday, August 17 2001 12:37:43, Gerald Kuehne wrote:
> > Deactivating the following two lines in bbdb/vm-pop-up-bbdb-buffer
> > helps for me:
> >
> > (when (not (string-match "XEmacs\\|Lucid" emacs-version))
> > (sit-for 0))
>
> Are you sure those line are in bbdb-vm
Deactivating the following two lines in bbdb/vm-pop-up-bbdb-buffer
helps for me:
(when (not (string-match "XEmacs\\|Lucid" emacs-version))
(sit-for 0))
No idea why but it works :->
Gerald
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
Gregg Morris writes:
> Before posting this question to the emacs list, start emacs from a
> command line with "emacs --debug-init" -- you may or may not get any
> interesting messages in stderr output.[...]
thanks for your debugging hints.
> Oh -- and what, exactly, happens when emacs "crashes".
In general, lisp code should never crash emacs.
This is more properly an emacs bug, and not a bbdb bug.
--
Colin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Hi
I encountered the following problem after upgrading to vm-6.95 and
bbdb-2.32:
After pressing "v" in vm (vm-visit-folder) and entering a folder name
new mails a retrieved for that folder and are displayed, but shortly
after that emacs crashes.
My configuration:
Redhat Linux 7.0
GNU Emacs 20.7
> "William" == William Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am using vm and bbdb and am trying to get the vm summary window to
> show the to: field when I am the sender of the message. Could someone
> tell me what I need to set, since I thought this was the default from
> reading the docs?
m" "Insidious Big Brother Database" t)
(autoload 'bbdb-name"bbdb-com" "Insidious Big Brother Database" t)
(autoload 'bbdb-company "bbdb-com" "Insidious Big Brother Database" t)
(autoload 'bbdb-net "bbdb-com" "Insi
20 matches
Mail list logo
