Yes let's keep focussed on the challenges we all face in different
landscapes and different cultures. bdnow is a wonderful tool for
sharing with and supporting each other in our Biodynamic work and
striving.
Yes Biodynamics is growing in Australia. We have a number of
Biodynamic associations arou
Hamish: I don't have them at hand but I believe that the BD /
Conventional study done in Victoria back in the early 90s compared irrigation
watering and I seem to remember a similar study in NZ. I'm fairly sure I read
about both in "Newsleaf". Hope this helps.
David C
- Original Messag
- Original Message -
From:
Hamish
Mackay
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:47
PM
Subject: water consumption
Can anyone give me some hard data on reduction of
water requirements on Biodynamic land?
would be appreciated
aye
Allan I'll do my best to tape the talk, but you may have to wait to hear it
on our website?
L&L
Liz
I hope you meant "LOL"
-Allan
___
BDNow mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://lists.envirolink.org/mailman/l
On irrigated land in temperate Oz, the reduction should be of the order of
five sixths to nine tenths. This includes the water holding capacity of the
increased soil carbon and the reduction of use by the healthy plants. On
otherwise traditional, irrigated, vineyards should only require one to
>Hi all
>
>Finally have heard word that Alex Podolinsky will be talking at the uni in
>Orange on the first weekend of August. Unsure of the details but will post
>these when confirmed. I'd be happy to put questions to him on behalf of
>others. Keeping in mind what Hamish has written; I can't hel
Hamish?
Who is to measure these things? How could a BD farmer be trusted by outsiders to do it?
Reduction of water requirements on my farm, the way I farm it, are HUGE, but I don't know how to accurately measure them as I have such variable weather and no data base of what it was prior to BD (a
Glen,
I look forward eagerly to discussion with you as e-mail is entirely too inadequate.
Hugh
Hugh
The main reference we need to refer to is the diagram in lec 8- pg 155 I think.
>From what you have said below you have what RS is saying re Cosmic and Earthly nutrition streams in humans which
No I have not read PrairyErth but it sounds intriguing.
There are so many nuances new to life, so many billions of (for lack of a better word circuitry) and subtleties involved in mere movement, that they drive one to distraction. Oh yes paying attention is at a premium. It is unfortunate that so
