I'm a sorta newbie to PERL and i was wondering if therte are any good PERL
compilers. Back in June I started to experiment with PERL but it takes a
long time to write. I have a Win 2000 PC.
Cheers
Mikes
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It
compiles perl into c
Harry
*
COLT Telecommunications
Registered in England No. 2452736
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4 Norton
Dear,
I've tried to compile a script perl through perlcc, but it has returned me the
following error:
bash-2.04# perlcc teste.pl
Compiling teste.pl:
--
can't
remember who makes it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PERL Compiler
I'm a sorta newbie to PERL and i was wondering if therte are any good PERL
compilers. Back in June
As you're a newbie, I thought I'd mention that you don't need to compile
your Perl code, it's done for you by the interpreter before being run.
The interpreter for Win2k is at http://www.activestate.com/
You probably already know but just in case...
Nigel
>>> "Michael Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PERL Compiler
As you're a newbie, I thought I'd mention that you don't need to compile
your Perl code, it's done for you by the interpreter before being run.
The interpr
If you are using activestate try
ppm install
If you are using a different flavor try
perl -MCPAN -e "install "
Cheers,
Kristina
I wanted to get the additional modules, so I downloaded the stable.zip
onto
my NT machine and unzipped it, but I haven't been able to get it to
recogni
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 09:13 , Jackson, Harry wrote:
>
> Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It
> compiles perl into c
>
> Harry
and if you read the perldoc on it, it's a beta release
and is not guranteed to be sane or stable and it's
not the stuff
Harry Jackson wrote at Thu, 30 May 2002 18:13:57 +0200:
> Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It compiles
>perl into c
>
> Harry
>
>
>
>
>*
>COLT
> Telecommunications
> R
Janek --
...and then Janek Schleicher said...
%
% Harry Jackson wrote at Thu, 30 May 2002 18:13:57 +0200:
%
[short post with long disclaimer -- replicated in its entirety! -- snipped]
%
% Allthough, I'm very interested in your information, something seems wrong.
% There's one line pure inform
Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing program for windows
that is free. Please help me!
available for Perl are
phenomenal.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl compiler and editor for windows
Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing
program for
You need an interpreter; you can use any text editor you want.
There are some IDEs (if you don't know what that is, think of
it as a word processor that knows Perl), most notably ActiveState's
Komodo (it's in a Beta version now) -- on my computer (1GHz Athlon)
it's slow as molasses. I use Notepa
> > Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing
> > program for windows that is free. Please help me!
>
> You need an interpreter; you can use any text editor you want.
> There are some IDEs (if you don't know what that is, think of
> it as a word processor that knows Perl),
My favorite text editor is notetab (www.notetab.com) and you happen to be
able to run perl from it.
I know it is not free but my favorite integrated tool is OptiPerl.
www.xarka.com. Good value for $US59.
I use this with ActiveState Perl and an NT Apache build.
Regards,
Richard
At 22:05 6
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
emacs works well in linux/windows...
free and easy to use
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:25 PM
Subject: perl compiler and editor for windows
PROTECTED]
Cc: Gabriel Presas (rat432)
Subject: Re: perl compiler and editor for windows
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
emacs works well in linux/windows...
free and easy to use
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
m A favorite
> among Microsoft. ;)
>
> -Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabriel Presas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:53 AM
> To: Chris Sauer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Gabriel Presas (rat432)
> Subject: Re: perl compiler and
Hi, guys,
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
I tried PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState.
It works pretty well.
But it's not free.
Where can I get a free perl compiler, as powerful as PDK-Pro-6.0 from
ActiveState?
Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
Xun
--
Best wishes,
Xun
--
To unsubscri
Xun Yu wrote:
Hi, guys,
hello,
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I tried PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState.
It works pretty well.
But it's not free.
Where can I get a free perl compiler, as powerful as PDK-Pro-6.0 from
ActiveState?
My /usr/bin/perl is pretty pow
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, JupiterHost.Net wrote:
> Xun Yu wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a free perl compiler.
>
> My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I suspect he wants something for Windows.
By "compiler", I further suspect that he wants something that will
generate .exe fil
more powerfull than perlcc,
and must be free.
Thanks.
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:54:49 +0800, Xun Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> I am looking for a free perl compiler.
>
> I tried PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState.
> It works pretty well.
> But it's not f
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:56:15 +0800, Xun Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is I can only get a evaluate license for PDK-Pro-6.0,
so what I am looking for is a compiler more powerfull than perlcc,
and must be free.
I don't know if this is really what you want,
but you can try to look at CPAN
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I suspect he wants something for Windows.
By "compiler", I further suspect that he wants something that will
generate .exe files that can be run without a perl.exe on the system.
If the usual line of thinkin
>
*** Somewhat off-topic ***
> * Obfuscators don't work well enough to bother with. If you can't have
> people reading your code, don't use Perl, or better still, use Perl but
> don't allow access to the machine where the program runs (e.g. put up a
> web interface to a service under your contro
AIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: I am looking for a free perl compiler.
>
*** Somewhat off-topic ***
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for
> comercial purposes)?
For any purposes, yes, code cannot be hidden.
More broadly, for any interpreted language -- Perl, Python, Tcl, even
ones like Java and Visual Basic -- it's fair
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Xun Yu wrote:
> I am going to compile a perl script to binary on linux
That was worth mentioning up front! :-)
> I tried perlcc, I doesn't always works well.
No, it doesn't.
> I tried the same script with perlapp from PDK-Pro-6.0 from
> ActiveState? It works.
>
> The pr
> So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for comercial
> purposes)?
> A license is equal to zero in some countries... so that's not a solution.
>
Well - never say, "Never" ... I think the output from perlcc is pretty
inscrutable for any but the most dedicated attacker, and a
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:26:58 -0500 (EST), Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> > So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for
> > comercial purposes)?
>
> For any purposes, yes, code cannot be hidden.
It can be hidden, but i
Lawrence Statton wrote:
So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for comercial
purposes)?
A license is equal to zero in some countries... so that's not a solution.
Well - never say, "Never" ... I think the output from perlcc is pretty
inscrutable for any but the most dedicated a
the application
than try to reverse engineer someone's obfuscated version. (I had
exactly that happen for a work-related project. After spending three
days deobfuscating, I threw up my hands and rewrote from scratch in
one afternoon.)
I was looking into a binary-output Perl compiler some ti
Jonathan Paton wrote:
I think it's *HIGHLY* ironic that the original poster is looking for a
solution that allows him to close off his code, but demands that it be
a freely distributable solution to his problem. My first reaction is:
If you want to lock the door on your code (and I think that is
33 matches
Mail list logo
