Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread Jose Alves de Castro
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 17:57, JupiterHost.Net wrote: When people undiscriminatingly advocate the use of modules whenever possible, I get unhappy. I'm using modules when I consider it to be suitable. Peace my friend, do whatever you want. It wasn't an attack, that's what the smiley's

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Gunnar == Gunnar Hjalmarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gunnar I hear that you have never distributed CGI scripts to people who Gunnar typically have never heard of CPAN and don't have shell access, and to Gunnar whom Perl and CGI are synonyms. That's the 'business' I am in. Then cut and paste

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Gunnar == Gunnar Hjalmarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gunnar Yeah, I noticed that, too. Randal should really think twice before Gunnar including '' in his real addresses. :) This is why I have to fight the continual battle. Too many websites are borked. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Gunnar Hjalmarsson writes: I hear that you have never distributed CGI scripts to people who typically have never heard of CPAN and don't have shell access, and to whom Perl and CGI are synonyms. That's the 'business' I am in. Then cut and paste the relevant parts of

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread JupiterHost.Net
I beleive you're taking everyone's good advice as a personal attack. Everyone is trying to help you avoid pitfall's you're likley to come accross based on experience, lots of it. Everyone is trying to help you. Do whatever you want, but if you don't want answers don't ask for free help :)

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-05 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
JupiterHost.Net wrote: I beleive you're taking everyone's good advice as a personal attack. Now you are using that word attack again, and I can asure you that I'm not. Everyone is trying to help you. Do whatever you want, but if you don't want answers don't ask for free help :) Well, my initial

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Gunnar == Gunnar Hjalmarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gunnar As a result of the thread Check for valid email address, I have Gunnar modified my emailsyntax() function to better conform to RFC 822. After Gunnar all, I wouldn't like e.g. my contact form module to reject Randal when Gunnar he has

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Gunnar == Gunnar Hjalmarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gunnar As a result of the thread Check for valid email address, I have Gunnar modified my emailsyntax() function to better conform to RFC 822. After Gunnar all, I wouldn't like e.g. my contact form module to reject

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Again, why aren't you just using Email::Valid? I have already explained that: http://www.mail-archive.com/beginners%40perl.org/msg62450.html Faulty reasoning, the modules are available for public download to and if they don't have them they'll know it from the error you output about it

RE: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Bob Showalter
Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Again, why aren't you just using Email::Valid? I have already explained that: http://www.mail-archive.com/beginners%40perl.org/msg62450.html Interesting; if you visit that link, www.mail-archive.com evidently doesn't properly match RFC822

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
JupiterHost.Net wrote: Again, why aren't you just using Email::Valid? I have already explained that: http://www.mail-archive.com/beginners%40perl.org/msg62450.html Faulty reasoning, the modules are available for public download to and if they don't have them they'll know it from the error you

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Bob Showalter wrote: Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Again, why aren't you just using Email::Valid? I have already explained that: http://www.mail-archive.com/beginners%40perl.org/msg62450.html Interesting; if you visit that link, www.mail-archive.com evidently doesn't properly

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: JupiterHost.Net wrote: Again, why aren't you just using Email::Valid? I have already explained that: http://www.mail-archive.com/beginners%40perl.org/msg62450.html Faulty reasoning, the modules are available for public download to and if they don't have them they'll

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
JupiterHost.Net wrote: Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: I hear that you have never distributed CGI scripts to people who You hear? From who? Who told! :) Well, that was the only explanation I could figure out to your firm opinion in the matter. typically have never heard of CPAN and don't have shell

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread JupiterHost.Net
When people undiscriminatingly advocate the use of modules whenever possible, I get unhappy. I'm using modules when I consider it to be suitable. Peace my friend, do whatever you want. It wasn't an attack, that's what the smiley's are for :) Chill chill chill ;p -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
JupiterHost.Net wrote: When people undiscriminatingly advocate the use of modules whenever possible, I get unhappy. I'm using modules when I consider it to be suitable. Peace my friend, do whatever you want. It wasn't an attack, that's what the smiley's are for :) I didn't think you were attacking

Re: OT: Email syntax validation

2004-10-04 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: JupiterHost.Net wrote: When people undiscriminatingly advocate the use of modules whenever possible, I get unhappy. I'm using modules when I consider it to be suitable. Peace my friend, do whatever you want. It wasn't an attack, that's what the smiley's are for :) I