Re: Unique Array Help?

2012-05-18 Thread Omega -1911
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Rob Dixon wrote: > On 18/05/2012 02:09, Omega -1911 wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:58 PM, jbiskofski  wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Omega -1911<1911...@gmail.com>  wrote: While trying to create a script that generates a grap

Re: Unique Array Help?

2012-05-18 Thread Rob Dixon
On 18/05/2012 02:09, Omega -1911 wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:58 PM, jbiskofski wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Omega -1911<1911...@gmail.com> wrote: While trying to create a script that generates a graph, I am at a loss for a workable solution. What I need to be able to do in th

Re: Unique Array Help?

2012-05-17 Thread Omega -1911
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:58 PM, jbiskofski wrote: > The easiest thing would be to rewrite your sql with an aggregate statement : > > SELECT employee_id,date,SUM(hours_wrkd) >  FROM data WHERE date >= $date_then AND date <= $date_now > GROUP BY empoyee_id,date > ORDER BY 3 > > cheers. > > - Jose f

Re: Unique Array Help?

2012-05-17 Thread jbiskofski
The easiest thing would be to rewrite your sql with an aggregate statement : SELECT employee_id,date,SUM(hours_wrkd) FROM data WHERE date >= $date_then AND date <= $date_now GROUP BY empoyee_id,date ORDER BY 3 cheers. - Jose from Mexico On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Omega -1911 <1911...@

Re: unique array

2004-07-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Perl" == Perl Org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Perl> Several people responded individually with comments like this. Perl> If the authors care, shouldn't they contact the ISP? I mean, I Perl> can't police the internet single-handedly. No, but you can have enough sense that if the ENTIRE WOR

Re: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan
On Jul 2, perl.org said: >>From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, is >this really the best way to ensure an *ordered* list contains only unique >values? It seems like it could/should be easier. I wonder why the >examples don't use my. If you want a more transparent ap

Re: Copyright Violation -> RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> Hmm, if I hadn't posted the link at least one person would have told me to > check the docs. But I guess there are more useless responses if I do post the > link. So next time please don't ask me to check the docs. > There are free docs available, I don't think anyone has ever suggested check

Re: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Randy W. Sims
perl.org wrote: Sorry, I didn't mean ordered as in sorted, I meant ordered as in I don't want to lose whatever order their in. But thanks for the tip. Oops. There's been a lot of discussions on sorting lately, and I guess I mis-associated. Anyway, my previous arguement still applies. You have to

Re: Copyright Violation -> RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread u235sentinel
Bakken, Luke wrote: How nice of you to decide this for O'Reilly. I think the local grocery store has made enough money for today, and I think I'll go in and take an apple. Why just an apple? Why not a big fat steak? It doesn't have to end there also, maybe I can come back for dessert later :-)

Re: Copyright Violation -> RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread perl.org
Hmm, if I hadn't posted the link at least one person would have told me to check the docs. But I guess there are more useless responses if I do post the link. So next time please don't ask me to check the docs. Why doesn't someone go police google then - they gave me the link. -- To unsubscr

Copyright Violation -> RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Bakken, Luke
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:32:49 -0400 , Bob Showalter wrote > > perl.org wrote: > > > From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, > > > > Methinks that stuff is illegally posted copyrighted information. > > Several people responded individually with comments like > this. If

Re: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Randy W. Sims
perl.org wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:32:49 -0400 , Bob Showalter wrote perl.org wrote: From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, Methinks that stuff is illegally posted copyrighted information. Several people responded individually with comments like this. If the authors

RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Bob Showalter
perl.org wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:32:49 -0400 , Bob Showalter wrote > > perl.org wrote: > > > From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, > > > > Methinks that stuff is illegally posted copyrighted information. > > Several people responded individually with comments li

RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread perl.org
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:32:49 -0400 , Bob Showalter wrote > perl.org wrote: > > From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, > > Methinks that stuff is illegally posted copyrighted information. Several people responded individually with comments like this. If the authors care

Re: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread perl.org
Sorry, I didn't mean ordered as in sorted, I meant ordered as in I don't want to lose whatever order their in. But thanks for the tip. On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:26:02 -0400, Randy W. Sims wrote > perl.org wrote: > >>From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, is this > > really

RE: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Bob Showalter
perl.org wrote: > From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, Methinks that stuff is illegally posted copyrighted information. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: unique array

2004-07-02 Thread Randy W. Sims
perl.org wrote: From http://iis1.cps.unizar.es/Oreilly/perl/cookbook/ch04_07.htm, is this really the best way to ensure an *ordered* list contains only unique values? It seems like it could/should be easier. I wonder why the examples don't use my. %seen = (); @uniq = (); foreach $item (@list) {