Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread drieux
On Dec 3, 2003, at 7:41 AM, Greg Zartman wrote: [..] Maybe this is just my inexperience showing here, but I was under the impression that when you attached a module (i.e. use CGI.pm), it was compiled with the rest of your script. If this is incorrect? [..] Yes, and sorta. Those parts of the modul

Beta Testing a Robot

2003-12-03 Thread Casey West
I'm beta-testing a robot that searches Google when new questions are posed to the beginners' lists. I have no idea if it will be useful. :-) I'm going to watch it closely and hope it is. I'll remove it if I find that it does a bad job. Casey West -- Good Idea: Kissing a loved one. Bad Idea:

Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> > What resources are you concerned about? It appears most of CGI.pm is > > autoloaded at first usage, which should help matters of CPU and memory > > usage. > > Maybe this is just my inexperience showing here, but I was under the > impression that when you attached a module (i.e. use CGI.pm

Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread Greg Zartman
What resources are you concerned about? It appears most of CGI.pm is autoloaded at first usage, which should help matters of CPU and memory usage. Maybe this is just my inexperience showing here, but I was under the impression that when you attached a module (i.e. use CGI.pm), it was compiled w

Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> > This is one of the things CGI::Safe does, it is really just a wrapper > > around CGI.pm but it allows you to do it without having to edit the > > source, or to set it in every script, which is actually pretty nice. > > Yes, inspection of the CGI::Safe source indeed shows this. Bottom line,

Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread Greg Zartman
This is one of the things CGI::Safe does, it is really just a wrapper around CGI.pm but it allows you to do it without having to edit the source, or to set it in every script, which is actually pretty nice. Yes, inspection of the CGI::Safe source indeed shows this. Bottom line, I was trying to ma

Re: CGI.pm question

2003-12-03 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:43:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Zartman) > wrote: > > > > >I'm relatively inexperienced at using this module as I've always > >preferred coding my own cgi functions. A question: > > > >If one were to use the CGI::Safe CGI subclass to turn-off uploads, does > >thi