On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:18:37PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
: I thought that the moderators had asked for these threads to be ceased.
Yes, we have. This will be the last and final message on the
subject. :)
: The number of emails on this topic, along with the ones on unsubscribing is
: ge
7;s served by that?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Al Hospers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:20 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Different reply-to?
> >
> > > although I *have*
> > > gotten in
the list. The
community will lose good interactive communication, and be deprived of a
wealth of potential resources. Who's served by that?
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Hospers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
> although I *have*
> gotten into the habit of using "reply-all" instead of
> "reply-to", thus
> getting my mail out to its intended recipient, I receive
> multiple copies of
> the same post from other people who use "reply-all" and don't
> take out
> everybody's name from the To: field. I have r
At 08:51 26.06.2001 -0700, Curtis Poe wrote:
>Okay, maybe I'm just being silly, but I'm a bit tired of hitting "reply"
>instead of "reply all"
>and forgetting that my message wasn't sent to the list. While I want to
>help people who ask
>questions, I'd like this help to be available for all.
>
