Error messages are always shown.
When level set to ERROR only error messages are shown - no warning,
info or debug.
When level set to WARNING only error & warnings messages are shown -
no info or debug.
etc.
Use of "uninitialised string" is another effectively warning -
basically indicating
Philip Meyer;441700 Wrote:
> >Hah! You were right, Phil. A single "Dvorak" track in an obscure VA
> >album poisoned the whole lot. 232 "Dvořák"s votes vs 1 "Dvorak"
> >and "Dvorak" wins. I hope none of the SC developers are moonlighting
> >writing elections systems software. The WONTFIX judg
kdf;441742 Wrote:
> Goodsounds wrote:
> > funkstar;441593 Wrote:
> >
> >> So what do you sugest?
> >>
> >> All development to be done behind closed doors and only official
> >> releases are made public?
> >>
> >
> > Isn't that what most companies do?
> >
> >
> >
> and that makes it ri
Goodsounds;441741 Wrote:
>
> > funkstar Wrote:
> >
> > So what do you sugest?
> >
> > All development to be done behind closed doors and only official
> > releases are made public?
> > > >
> Isn't that what most companies do?
>
Yes and the result is that when the product is released in a be
What is the target for hardware requiremets for 7.4?
--
rbz5416
rbz5416's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12089
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63346
_
rbz5416;441775 Wrote:
> What is the target for hardware requiremets for 7.4?
The same as it always has been - otherwise there will be a lot of
unhappy customers!
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB3 (wired) - T
erland;441747 Wrote:
>
> I suppose Logitech could rename the last one to "alpha" but I've a hard
> time seeing how a name change would make a big improvement.
I don't think people are looking for "improvement" by renaming it. The
"perception" out there is that when software is in "Beta" regular
Phil Leigh;441788 Wrote:
> The same as it always has been - otherwise there will be a lot of
> unhappy customers!I hope not as I thought the whole concept of 7.4 was to
> reduce it's
footprint?
--
rbz5416
rbz5416's Profi
rbz5416;441790 Wrote:
> I hope not as I thought the whole concept of 7.4 was to reduce it's
> footprint?
What I meant was it won't need more/better hardware.
It would appear that a smaller footprint can be achieved, but in turn I
imagine some folks will insist on trying to run it on something w
rbz5416;441790 Wrote:
> I hope not as I thought the whole concept of 7.4 was to reduce it's
> footprint?I think you're confusing 'requirement' with 'availability' ??
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.4 - 27567
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
--
tamanaco;441789 Wrote:
> when "Alpha" code is released it's understood this type of release is
> targeted for developers or skilled end users
The pages where the "beta" release can be downloaded certainly make
this aspect clear.
--
htrd
Toby Dickenson
Search eBay for music matching your last
Most development is taking place in the 7.4 noweb-sqllite branch. The
7.4 trunk is really kept for compatibility of users but it may not be up
to date with all changes.
So check out
http://svn.slimdevices.com/repos/slim/7.4/branches/noweb-sqlite/server/Changelog7.html
--
bpa
bonze;441798 Wrote:
> I think you're confusing 'requirement' with 'availability' ??I have
> absolutely no idea what you're trying to say?
--
rbz5416
rbz5416's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1208
michael123;441324 Wrote:
> Any improvements in sound area?
> ..and specifically for Transporter?
Friends,
is there any up-to-date release notes for 7.4 branch?
On the Wiki, there is a very short list of bugs, which did not change
at all for the last couple of months..
http://svn.slimdevices.com/
Goodsounds;441741 Wrote:
> Isn't that what most companies do?
Nope. At least not when it come to open source projects.
--
autopilot
Cheers, auto.
-"don't call me Shirley."-
autopilot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevice
thanks
Se, it is still actually a (minor) bug-fix branch and mostly
memory-related optimizations...
Is there anybody working on version 8?
In which state it is?
--
michael123
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevic
andyg;441683 Wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2009, at 4:01 PM, MeSue wrote:
>
> >
> > Can I please get some help? I cant seem to get a scan of my music.
> My
> > scanner log is attached.
>
> "database disk image is malformed"
>
> This seems to only happen on Windows and I haven't seen it. Need to
> fig
sxr71;441297 Wrote:
> I am using 7.34 not 7.4. It has been suggested when features are broken
> in the released 7.3 to try 7.34 and it too has its problems. As for 7.4
> I would never use it again until it is release ready and then again
> probably not unless Trackstat works with it.
You seem to
kdf;441742 Wrote:
> Goodsounds wrote:
> > funkstar;441593 Wrote:
> >
> >> So what do you sugest?
> >>
> >> All development to be done behind closed doors and only official
> >> releases are made public?
> >>
> >
> > Isn't that what most companies do?
> >
> >
> >
> and that makes it ri
Goodsounds;441851 Wrote:
> Not necessarily. But when there is a predominant practice among
> companies with respect to a particular task(product
> testing/development), isn't it fair to assume that thoughtful people
> agree on that as a better approach?
No I disagree in the case of SC. It is a c
Nonreality;441739 Wrote:
> I gave up on 7.4 as it was not beta ready. Very much alpha. don't mind
> testing something that is in the beta stage but man this was just too
> much. Each version you had no idea if it would mess up the whole
> system. I'll wait a bit.
This is for everybody complai
Phil Leigh;441857 Wrote:
> No I disagree in the case of SC. It is a cross-platform product
> attempting to support a bewildering variety of user OS/hardware
> platforms. Most software houses don't attempt to do that. It is
> imperative that SC betas are released into the community ASAP so that
>
Goodsounds;441870 Wrote:
> I'll defer to you guys, you know much more about this than I ever will.
> It just struck me that their approach produces unwanted noise and
> fireworks among the customer base. Regrettable distractions that one
> wouldn't want new or potential customers to be exposed t
erland;441878 Wrote:
> There is a reason why people participating in these forums tends to stay
> here for years, I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be the case if the
> development was handled in a closed environment.
It would certainally make things a lot less interesting that for sure
:)
--
funk
Please stop whining!!! If you use beta in a production environment then
you are just plain stupid. STUPID!!.
Beta is by definition always broken. Always. There is always a major
part of the system under reengineering and there fore it is broken. And
this goes particularly for 7.4 because of the
iPhone;441864 Wrote:
> This is for everybody complaining, what is going on here?! Beta is Beta
> is Beta. Any release other then Production is by default Beta and all
> bets are off. So 7.4 is very much Beta as its not production and most
> times still works properly. It ISN"T meant to be perfect
When I add a "library name" to my 7.4 server, server discovery will find
it twice, once under the server name and once under the library name.
Is this intentional?
I find it impossible to connect to the "server name" version correctly
using the information returned by the server discovery.
Removin
OK, changing it back fixed it. My 7.3 server still reports the wrong
name, though.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php
Still occurs for me on recent version of Squeezeplay running on Win7 -
100% of the time in the same place of the file, both Mp3 and Flac.
--
spedinfargo
spedinfargo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?useri
29 matches
Mail list logo
