Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-08 Thread Phil Meyer
>> You can clear fields, but it just removes that tag from the file, i.e. >> rather than write TALB=, it won't put a TALB tag in the file. > >so it actually removes that field from within the tag? that seems very >whacked out to me. Why? All tags are treated equally. You only need to store tags

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-06 Thread MrSinatra
Philip Meyer;481503 Wrote: > >but i don't think most users browse by genre. > I think many users browse by genre, as it limits the albums to scroll > through to a type of music the user wants to play. I do it quite > frequently, eg. if I only want to find a quiet album to play in bed when > I ca

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-06 Thread MrSinatra
Philip Meyer;481499 Wrote: > > >- Browsing Genres, the album shows up under 'No Genre > No Artist > No > Album'. > >- Browsing Artists, the album shows up under 'No Artist > No Album'. > > > Which is what I said last time Mr Sinatra didn't listen to me, but I > think he doesn't browse the librar

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-04 Thread JJZolx
Philip Meyer;481499 Wrote: > > >- Browsing Albums, the album doesn't show up at all and the album and > >track counts are reduced. > > > Which I would say is a bug - surely songs should appear under Browse > Albums as No Album by Various Artists. > > I thought it used to (I don't Browse Albums

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-04 Thread Phil Meyer
>but i don't think most users browse by genre. I think many users browse by genre, as it limits the albums to scroll through to a type of music the user wants to play. I do it quite frequently, eg. if I only want to find a quiet album to play in bed when I can't sleep, I Browse Genres > Ambient

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-04 Thread Phil Meyer
>If you have more than one untagged album, that 'No Album' album becomes >quite a mess. > No Album is just one big compilation album, and like any other compilation it can be accessed in different ways. Via an Artist (only shows No Album songs by that artist), via No Artist (only shows No Album

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-04 Thread JJZolx
MrSinatra;481487 Wrote: > > > - Browsing Genres, the album shows up under 'No Genre > No Artist > > No > > Album'. > > shows up how? like for each song, whats there? a filename? > > its good that its there in some way, but i don't think most users > browse by genre. Same as before. The filen

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
JJZolx;481484 Wrote: > - Browsing Genres, the album shows up under 'No Genre > No Artist > No > Album'. shows up how? like for each song, whats there? a filename? its good that its there in some way, but i don't think most users browse by genre. JJZolx;481484 Wrote: > - Browsing Artists, th

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
MrSinatra;481479 Wrote: > what does it do if it has no tags at all - Browsing Genres, the album shows up under 'No Genre > No Artist > No Album'. - Browsing Artists, the album shows up under 'No Artist > No Album'. - Browsing Albums, the album doesn't show up at all and the album and track cou

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
JJZolx;481481 Wrote: > It's 7.5 and the files are FLAC. Bug 8380 concerns tag merging and > mostly applies to MP3 files with both ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags. Doesn't > Andy's new ID3 tag merging address those issues for you? indeed, i'm very happy with it, b/c its good for SBS. (my personal tags ar

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
MrSinatra;481478 Wrote: > thats good news actually, b/c thats EXACTLY what i've been suggesting > for months... just look at bug 8380 > > it didn't used to do that. what ver of SBS is it doing it for you? It's 7.5 and the files are FLAC. Bug 8380 concerns tag merging and mostly applies to MP

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
btw, what does it do if it has no tags at all; and what does it do if it has tag[s] but they are completely devoid of data? -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - sbs 7.4.2b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
thats good news actually, b/c thats EXACTLY what i've been suggesting for months... just look at bug 8380 it didn't used to do that. what ver of SBS is it doing it for you? -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - sbs 7.4.2b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
MrSinatra;481438 Wrote: > does ANYONE purposely have "title" blank on a track? > > and even if they do, which is dopey, how would you play it in SBS if > its not listed? Well, let's test that, shall we... Looks like SbS simply uses the filename when all else fails (I have no guess tags formats

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
Philip Meyer;481346 Wrote: > >it sounded to me like testing for "title" in the Vorbis tag was what > >Andy was suggesting. if "title" were blank, then use id3 if present > and > >filled out. if not, ignore all other tags and just use Vorbis. > > > >Andy, would that not be the best way? > No, it

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
Philip Meyer;481343 Wrote: > >i don't think this would be widespread, but what if you had a Vorbis > tag > >present in the file, however it was blank? meanwhile, you also had > an > >id3 tag in that file, and it WASN'T blank? > If the album was ripped from CD to FLAC, I'd expect the ripper to wr

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Roger66
Teus de Jong;481334 Wrote: > Yes, I've done that now. I'm still doing :). > Finally, the test with the latest build: the problem I mentioned in the > first post is solved by Andy's fix. For me, too. Now everything is on 7.3.3 standard again :). -- Roger66 SB classic SB Boom Win XP Pro SP3 T

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Phil Meyer
>it sounded to me like testing for "title" in the Vorbis tag was what >Andy was suggesting. if "title" were blank, then use id3 if present and >filled out. if not, ignore all other tags and just use Vorbis. > >Andy, would that not be the best way? No, it wouldn't. There could be times when title

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Phil Meyer
>Thank you for your elaborate explanation Philip. Would clearing the >check box I mentioned in my previous post result in clearing all id3 >tags and leave only the ones I see (the FLAC tags)? There's no settings to control what gets read or written for FLAC tags. The easiest approach is to delet

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Phil Meyer
>i don't think this would be widespread, but what if you had a Vorbis tag >present in the file, however it was blank? meanwhile, you also had an >id3 tag in that file, and it WASN'T blank? If the album was ripped from CD to FLAC, I'd expect the ripper to write FLAC tags, and may or may not write

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
i don't think this would be widespread, but what if you had a Vorbis tag present in the file, however it was blank? meanwhile, you also had an id3 tag in that file, and it WASN'T blank? if the Vorbis tag is "present" yet blank, and SBS then ignores everything else, it will not be viewable in SBS

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
Philip Meyer;481326 Wrote: > > > There's no settings to control what gets read or written for FLAC tags. > The easiest approach is to delete all tags, and then undo, which will > write the FLAC tags back without the id3 tags. Yes, I've done that now. Finally, the test with the latest build: the

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
I totally agree with this approach. Teus -- Teus de Jong Teus de Jong's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15415 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70839 __

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Andy Grundman
On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Philip Meyer wrote: > > andyg;481139 Wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:05 AM, MrSinatra wrote: >> >>> >>> sounds appropriate to me! :) >>> >>> just to be clear, you are saying if it has Vorbis tags present, but >> >>> the >>> TITLE field in the vorbis tag is blank, then

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Philip Meyer
andyg;481139 Wrote: > On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:05 AM, MrSinatra wrote: > > > > > sounds appropriate to me! :) > > > > just to be clear, you are saying if it has Vorbis tags present, but > > > the > > TITLE field in the vorbis tag is blank, then in that case, it will > > forget Vorbis altogether a

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Andy Grundman
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:05 AM, MrSinatra wrote: > > sounds appropriate to me! :) > > just to be clear, you are saying if it has Vorbis tags present, but > the > TITLE field in the vorbis tag is blank, then in that case, it will > forget Vorbis altogether and use the id3 tag instead, right? or

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
sounds appropriate to me! :) just to be clear, you are saying if it has Vorbis tags present, but the TITLE field in the vorbis tag is blank, then in that case, it will forget Vorbis altogether and use the id3 tag instead, right? or will it merge them with whatever vorbis does have taking precen

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Andy Grundman
On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Phil Meyer wrote: >> The 4-letter tags are ID3 tags. >> > I have custom id3 tags that are not 4-letter tag frame names. eg. > ARTISTSORT and ALBUMARTIST tags. Would it be better to show these > as custom id3 tags, such as as TXXX : ? Right, TXXX tags are shown a

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Roger66
MrSinatra;481108 Wrote: > i'm not positive, but i would think you could setup a profile for flac, > and a profile for mp3 each with their own settings. eac supports > profiles. That's another option. Thank you ! -- Roger66 SB classic SB Boom Win XP Pro SP3 Thinkpad X60s

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
JJZolx;481096 Wrote: > Try this in Mp3tag: > > - First, make sure you have a recent backup of your library, just in > case... > > - Second, you must use the latest development version of Mp3tag (2.44e > or later). Earlier versions don't have the same filtering capability. > Download and insta

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
Roger66;481105 Wrote: > Thank you, > > I will check that when ripping next time. > Does this option have to be altered each time when ripping MP3 after > being ripping FLAC and vice versa ? > Or are these settings in different tabs (at the moment I don't have EAC > here) ? i'm not positive, bu

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
Well it's done; all clear now. I had only 23 discs with those FLAC ID3v2 tags. (I don't know how many discs I have exactly. SC reports 887 albums, but because I'm treating sets as one album that doesn't say much. I have so many classical albums with more disks -- up to 18 for 'Bernstein plays Mahl

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Roger66
JJZolx;481085 Wrote: > Could be EAC, if you use it. In EAC, under EAC > Compression Options > > External Compression, if 'Add ID3 tag' is checked when you rip and > encode to FLAC, it _will_ add both FLAC amd ID3 tags. Make sure it's > not checked. Thank you, I will check that when ripping ne

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
Jim, just a friendly fyi, u said "EAC" a lot in your last post when you meant "mp3tag" -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - sbs 7.4.2b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 - 35k mp3 -

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread MrSinatra
the sky is not falling, this is a good change that andy keeps refining to get better. the number one thing SBS should be able to do, is make your music available to you. it should never scan it and then hide it, in any way, ever, for any reason, (unless the user deliberately wants it so, as per

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
Teus de Jong;481075 Wrote: > Thanks for the info. Well it is confusing then, to say the least... > > The situation here is not as bad as I thought. I just looked and almost > none of my albums have ID3 tags. I'll have to find out how these came in > there. > > Teus Try this in EAC: - First, m

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
JJZolx;481085 Wrote: > Could be EAC, if you use it. In EAC, under EAC > Compression Options > > External Compression, if 'Add ID3 tag' is checked when you rip and > encode to FLAC, it _will_ add both FLAC amd ID3 tags. Make sure it's > not checked. Thank you, that must be it. Normally I rip wi

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
audiomuze;480993 Wrote: > if you configure it to show the TagType field you'll be able to identify > and filter on mixed tags and run a cut and paste operation to remove the > id3 tags. I was always under the impression mp3tag used a precedence of > vorbis tags over id3, but would use a id3 tag

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
Teus de Jong;481075 Wrote: > I'll have to find out how these came in there. Could be EAC, if you use it. In EAC, under EAC > Compression Options > External Compression, if 'Add ID3 tag' is checked when you rip and encode to FLAC, it _will_ add both FLAC amd ID3 tags. Make sure it's not checked

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
JJZolx;481059 Wrote: > The settings above are only for MP3 (and TTA) files. And they don't > work quite like you describe. Yes, it is a little confusing. Mp3tag > only removes tags when you use File > Remove tag (or Ctrl+R, or the big > red X icon), not each time you save. Thanks for the info

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread JJZolx
Teus de Jong;481052 Wrote: > I found one setting in MP3Tag that maybe causes this. In Options > Tags > > Mpeg (where is FLAC here?) it states: > > Write: ID3v2.3UTF-16 > Remove: ID3v2, ID3v2, APE > > This confusing option apparently means that although all ID3v2 tags are > removed, after that,

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
Philip Meyer;481041 Wrote: > > > ... > >The tags MP3Tag doesn't show (like TALB) are in contradiction with > >the FLAC tags (Album)[/color] > I think this could happen quite a lot. Some editors may store FLAC+id3 > (I think Mp3Tag used to do this by default - I've changed my prefs, not > sure wh

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Teus de Jong
andyg;480965 Wrote: > > ... > > 3. Don't mess with this, it worked perfectly. > > I fixed a bug today that should fix your problem, the FLAC Album tag > will now win out over the ID3 TALB tag. Nevertheless, you should > remove your bad ID3 tags as this may confuse other apps in the future.

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Phil Meyer
>The 4-letter tags are ID3 tags. > I have custom id3 tags that are not 4-letter tag frame names. eg. ARTISTSORT and ALBUMARTIST tags. Would it be better to show these as custom id3 tags, such as as TXXX : ? >MP3Tag doesn't show ID3 tags in FLAC files. It would, if the file only had id3 tags.

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-03 Thread Phil Meyer
>Thank you Phil, I didn't find this new info yet (just switched to >7.5.x). Here's what it says: > >Tag version: FLAC, ID3v2.3.0 > Yes, so you do have FLAC and ID3 tags present. If you have the latest version of 7.5.0, the scanner will now read all id3 tags that it understands, and then overwrit

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread audiomuze
gcurrie;481000 Wrote: > So is there a recommendation for a solid tag editor? Mp3tag is very > usable for tagging lots of music, but if it isn't showing things > correctly then it's usefulness is significantly lessened. there's absolutely nothing wrong with mp3tag, it's probably the most powerful

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread gcurrie
So is there a recommendation for a solid tag editor? Mp3tag is very usable for tagging lots of music, but if it isn't showing things correctly then it's usefulness is significantly lessened. -- gcurrie -Gordon Squeezebox Server 7.4.1 + HP MediaSmart EX485 Duet Squeezeplay on all PCs -

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread audiomuze
MrSinatra;480985 Wrote: > its aware i think that another tag is there, (it'll report it exists), > and it prob could read that data, but it only shows you the v2 data. i > think options controls then if edits to the tags are communicated and > updated into multiple tag types.if you configure it

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread MrSinatra
andyg;480965 Wrote: > > > My conclusion: > > 1. It is related to the things discussed in the other thread. > > 2. Only read the FLAC tags. (And why does MP3Tag not show the other > > tags?) > > 3. The tags MP3Tag doesn't show (like TALB) are in contradiction > with > > the FLAC tags (Album) > >

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread MrSinatra
i think Andy has it right... afterall, there may be users out there who only have id3 tags in their flacs. if so, you don't want to remove support for that. and if flac tags have the higher priority, it shouldn't be a problem for anyone with both kinds. frankly, you all should be glad for this

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Andy Grundman
On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:16 PM, JJZolx wrote: > > andyg;480965 Wrote: >> I fixed a bug today that should fix your problem, the FLAC Album tag >> will now win out over the ID3 TALB tag. Nevertheless, you should >> remove >> your bad ID3 tags as this may confuse other apps in the future. > > Is read

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread JJZolx
andyg;480965 Wrote: > I fixed a bug today that should fix your problem, the FLAC Album tag > will now win out over the ID3 TALB tag. Nevertheless, you should remove > your bad ID3 tags as this may confuse other apps in the future. Is reading ID3 tags in FLAC files new to SbS, or has it always b

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Andy Grundman
On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Teus de Jong wrote: > > Thank you Phil, I didn't find this new info yet (just switched to > 7.5.x). Here's what it says: > > Tag version: FLAC, ID3v2.3.0 > > Album: Dylan 2007 > AllPictures: ... > Artist: Bob Dylan > Comm: [0, eng,, Trackx] === what's this? An ID3v2 c

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Teus de Jong
Thank you Phil, I didn't find this new info yet (just switched to 7.5.x). Here's what it says: Tag version: FLAC, ID3v2.3.0 Album: Dylan 2007 AllPictures: ... Artist: Bob Dylan Comm: [0, eng,, Trackx] === what's this? Date: 3007 Discnumber: 1/3 Genre: Rock Replay gain tags TALB: Dylan [Disc 1] =

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Phil Meyer
>No, these are all FLAC files. Maybe there is a relation with the >problems in the other thread, but at the moment I don't see them. The >only tags in the files are: If you browse to song info, there should now be an option to View Tags, which will show what tags Squeezebox Server can see in the f

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Teus de Jong
gharris999;480893 Wrote: > These are mp3s, yes? Andy has been tweaking the 7.5 scanner code and > how it processes various verions of id3Vx tags. Is it possible that > what you are seeing is related? See > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70456 No, these are all FLAC files. Maybe

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread gharris999
These are mp3s, yes? Andy has been tweaking the 7.5 scanner code and how it processes various verions of id3Vx tags. Is it possible that what you are seeing is related? See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70456 -- gharris999 -

[SlimDevices: Beta] Curious bug in 7.5 scanner

2009-11-02 Thread Teus de Jong
I have the Dylan 2007 collection of three cds. Up to and including 7.4.2 these were scanned correctly (sets as one album is on): Album: Dylan 2007 tracks from cd1 tracks from cd2 tracks from cd3 For some reason, the scanner of 7.5 has three albums: Dylan [Disc 1] tracks from cd1 Dylan [Disc 2]