Mnyb wrote:
> So whats your saying is that it works for you on debian with the latest
> 7.9
thats what i'd tried to say - but tbh - its one of many scenarios.
That File wasnt tagged as sampler - may thats another issue???
Mnyb wrote:
> Then its actually better than ever :) is it something
DJanGo wrote:
> i think he uses a special scenario.
>
> i retagged a file from Abba to ABba and did a rescan:
>
> This tells me - rescan is working.
>
> >
Code:
> > select id,name,namesort,namesearch from contributors where name like
'Abba';
> 59|Abba|ABBA|ABBA
Mnyb wrote:
> It seems like add new works just fine , its the changed part that could
> be better ?
>
i think he uses a special scenario.
i retagged a file from Abba to ABba and did a rescan:
This tells me - rescan is working.
Code:
select
DJanGo wrote:
> hmm didnt see that on my setup. but i will check that right now.
ahh ok - just checked that and that afaik pretty new behavior.
copy a song - changed the artist to some rubbish
do a rescan
check for the rubbish artist
removed the fil and did a rescan again
rubbish artist was
One way to put it is if you .
*Scanned all your files at once .
*added one album at time and incrementaly scanned until your finished .
* some mix of the above and then remove stuff tweak it and add again .
If you not into to how computing stuff works ( I do some industrial
controller Stuff ,
frank1969 wrote:
> I don't agree. If I do a complete misspelling (like AA) in my
> library and I correct it, with the next "new and changed"-scan LMS
> removes this "AA" artist from my db. Scanner seems to do some kind
> of cleanup (Maybe Michaee can confess?)
hmm didnt see that on my
DJanGo wrote:
> AFAIK its like that:
> LMS doesnt know if Abba is only used in these two retaged files only or
> if Abba is somewhere tagged as Band/Composer.
> Therefore LMS didnt remove Abba from the library.
>
I don't agree. If I do a complete misspelling (like AA) in my
library and I
And why is the file names important ? it's the tagging thats important
.Do you resort to untagged files and have LMS guesing artist etc from
the file names ?
Another case of case sentive vs not case sensitive are *.cue files .LMS
on Win find the corrsponing flac,mp3 or wav vs on *nix the case
frank1969 wrote:
> So I don't understand what happens there:
> If windows sees both as the same file, scanner (who is case sensitive)
> should just see "changed file", (example 1) remove the old artist "Abba"
> and insert the new artist "ABBA". I don't understand why it keeps the
> old spelled
mherger wrote:
> The short answer to your subject: the scanner is case sensitive, but
> Windows is not.
I'm aware of this fact - but just therefore I thought it wouldn't
matter, if the file is called "Ich liebe Dich" or "Ich liebe dich" - or
"ABBA" <=> "Abba" - for Windows is case insensitive
frank1969 wrote:
> Sound like a good idea to test - but I don't have this entry in my menu
> ( using LMS 7.9.0 r1477086729 )
You need the Additional Browse Modes plugin installed.
Then, Settings > Player Tab > Additional Browse Modes (dropdown) > check
or uncheck items you wish to appear
kidstypike wrote:
> If your temporary folder isn't scanned by LMS, then you can use Discs &
> Folders *(NOT* Music Folder) to browse and play the files without them
> being added to the database.
Sound like a good idea to test - but I don't have this entry in my menu
( using LMS 7.9.0
The short answer to your subject: the scanner is case sensitive, but
Windows is not. This can lead to all kinds of confusion.
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
frank1969 wrote:
> I think that's not the way it would work.
> I put the "new ones" in a special folder till I have time to fix them .
> of course I don't mix "fixed tags" with others.
> But I don't have this much time - so since April there are 48.312 files
> in this special directory (the new
frank1969 wrote:
> I think that's not the way it would work.
> Since its "my" way i know it works ;-)
frank1969 wrote:
> I put the "new ones" in a special folder till I have time to fix them .
> of course I don't mix "fixed tags" with others.
> But I don't have this much time - so since April
DJanGo wrote:
> fix the 500k collection once and your done.
> Dont put new files on your lib until the tags are good.
I think that's not the way it would work.
I put the "new ones" in a special folder till I have time to fix them .
of course I don't mix "fixed tags" with others.
But I don't
frank1969 wrote:
> Well, that's clear - but a clear and rescan takes nearly 6 hours on my >
> 500k collection, so I can't do it that often.
> I think, this is the reason why "new and changed" was invented... ;-)
fix the 500k collection once and your done.
Dont put new files on your lib until
kidstypike wrote:
> A clear and rescan should fix all the duplicates.
Well, that's clear - but a clear and rescan takes nearly 6 hours on my >
500k collection, so I can't do it that often.
I think, this is the reason why "new and changed" was invented... ;-)
A clear and rescan should fix all the duplicates.
kidstypike
LMS on Raspberry Pi 3/max2play/HiFiBerry DAC+ > AVI DM5
1 x SB3 - 1 x Boom - 1 x (Squeezebox) Radio - 2 x Touch - 2 x Raspberry
Pi/piCorePlayer/HiFiBerry
I see LMS' scanner beeing case sensitive in a very "special" way
(Windows 10).
Example #1:
I had my "ABBA"-files/albums in a folder called "Abba" and artist (as
well as artist album) labeled to "Abba"
I recognized on all samplers they're spelled "ABBA" and I had to
different artists (expected
20 matches
Mail list logo
