-
KAJIYAMA, Tamito
-Original Message-
From: Dan Eicher
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:45 AM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Freestyle branch status report May 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Tamito KAJIYAMA
wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Auto-generation of the F
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Tamito KAJIYAMA
wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Auto-generation of the Freestyle Python API would be great if that is
> feasible and practical. There are about 150 Python wrappers of C++ classes,
> and maintaining them manually has been a kinda painful excercise.
>
> Just for y
.
Regards,
--
KAJIYAMA, Tamito
-Original Message-
From: Campbell Barton
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:43 AM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Freestyle branch status report May 2012
@Tamito, I figured auto generation wasn't really an option here so
d
Eicher
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:06 AM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Freestyle branch status report May 2012
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
> @Tamito, I figured auto generation wasn't really an option here so
> didn't mentio
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Campbell Barton wrote:
> @Tamito, I figured auto generation wasn't really an option here so
> didn't mention it - of course if it was practical it would be a nice
> time saver.
I wouldn't be too much trouble to come up with some pybindgen scripts
to auto-generate
is mechanism, and indeed
> it works very well. Implementing a similar (automated) functionality in
> makerna
> would be a major task.
>
> --
> KAJIYAMA, Tamito
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Campbell Barton
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:57 AM
> To: bf-blender
makerna
would be a major task.
--
KAJIYAMA, Tamito
-Original Message-
From: Campbell Barton
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:57 AM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Freestyle branch status report May 2012
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Dan Eicher wrote
mproving the present GUI design are highly welcome.
That is all for now. Comments and suggestions are much appreciated.
Regards,
T.K.
--
KAJIYAMA, Tamito
-Original Message-
From: Ton Roosendaal
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:50 PM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-comm
Hi,
I just downloaded a build and checked it. You are right, it's a post
process for the Blender Internal.
I had the impression Freestyle was an external render engine.
(http://freestyle.sourceforge.net/)
So I think this is fine. Still I think the UI needs a lot of
work...several panels in the
Hi,
Cartoon render is very useful as a feature.
Whether that's as separate download, as engine (like yafaray) or integrated we
can always check on later... to me it seems we should first try to grasp and
evaluate what has been done and how this integrates with Blender's features,
our other ren
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote:
> Hi,
> first of all congrats for the project and your work over the last couple
> of years! :)
>
> Although I understand the need and the users want this in trunk I am a
> bit sceptical of the integration.
>
> Basically I would prefer to see
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Dan Eicher wrote:
> Quickly looking over the python part of the patch, there's lots of
> places where you should be using PyGetSetDef for attributes instead of
> function getters/setters -- for eg StrokeShader.name instead of
> StrokeShader.getName().
>
> Don't kno
Hi,
first of all congrats for the project and your work over the last couple
of years! :)
Although I understand the need and the users want this in trunk I am a
bit sceptical of the integration.
Basically I would prefer to see Freestyle being implemented as an
external engine rather than hook
Quickly looking over the python part of the patch, there's lots of
places where you should be using PyGetSetDef for attributes instead of
function getters/setters -- for eg StrokeShader.name instead of
StrokeShader.getName().
Don't know if makesrna can do C++ but that would make it a lot easier
th
,
--
KAJIYAMA, Tamito
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Bishop
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:09 AM
To: bf-blender developers
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Freestyle branch status report May 2012
Do you have a diff against trunk available? I'd be interested to see
how big
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tamito KAJIYAMA
wrote:
> Hi all,
I'd certainly favor merging now, it is already quite useful to end
users, it isn't 'buggy' and you actively fix bugs that are found. It
doesn't really have much risk of negatively impacting other projects.
While you still have fea
Hi,
I'm not a developer, I'm a freestyle-branch blender user. And I just
wanted to give my opinion. We are working everyday with the freestyle
branch in our animation company (anigoanimation.com). It's incomplete,
yes, but the current state of the project is perfectly usable for
production.
So
Do you have a diff against trunk available? I'd be interested to see
how big of a changeset this merge would be.
Thanks,
-Nicholas
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Tamito KAJIYAMA
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The scope of this message is to report the up-to-date status of the Freestyle
> branch and
> d
Hi all,
The scope of this message is to report the up-to-date status of the Freestyle
branch and
discuss the possibility of the merge into the trunk.
Since the January 2011 status report [1], the Freestyle development has focused
on
stability improvements and the completion of selected unfinish
19 matches
Mail list logo
