> * I've removed the iPad comment, didn't know about all those
> restrictions Apple puts on it... it was just an example, now clearly a
> stupid one :)
I disagree. :) Apple may restrict it a lot, but Blender's strengths of
modeling, surfacing, and sculpting would be wonderful to have on an iPa
Hi there!
So to the feedback I got:
* I've removed the iPad comment, didn't know about all those
restrictions Apple puts on it... it was just an example, now clearly a
stupid one :)
* After first setting multitouch mandatory as I've found a nice way to
do multitouch with 2 mice on linux [1] I
--- On Mon, 3/29/10, neXyon wrote:
> From: neXyon
> Subject: [Bf-committers] neXyon's GSoC 2010 proposals
> To: "bf-blender developers"
> Received: Monday, March 29, 2010, 10:59 AM
> Hi there!
>
> I've had some ideas and quite liked some of the ide
Nathan Vegdahl wrote:
> Blender on mobile devices would indeed be cool. But with regards to
> the iPad, my understanding is that Apple doesn't allow applications
> with generic scripting languages on the iPhone/iPad/etc. If they did,
> it would be a back-door for developing arbitrary applications
> Mobile Blending sounds amazing (I'm picking up an iPad for
> development soon, and would LOVE to use Blender on it). My
> only concern there: Multitouch should, I think, be a required
> deliverable.
Blender on mobile devices would indeed be cool. But with regards to
the iPad, my understanding
--- On Mon, 3/29/10, Charles Wardlaw wrote:
> Question for everyone on plugins: could a project like this
> that gave access to RNA structures somehow be licensed under
> the LGPL instead of the GPL, so that commercial plugins
> would become possible?
This would require relicensing blender's c
Nexyon, your proposals sound great. :)
My personal vote (not that it matters) goes behind the generic nodes-- I think
that it'll benefit the most people and help the community overall the most of
everything there.
Mobile Blending sounds amazing (I'm picking up an iPad for development soon,
and
Wow nexyon I must say you covered a lot of ground with all of the
proposals and in each singular proposal as well,
In your opinion, which of these will go into the gsoc time frame ?
Ps I'm not a mentor
Great job
Shul
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:59 AM, neXyon wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I've had some
Hi there!
I've had some ideas and quite liked some of the ideas other people told
me, so I've set up some drafts of proposals for GSoC 2010 of projects
that I'd really like to do.
They are 7 proposals all together. So far I've not detailed them very
much as I don't see much sense in working on
