Re: [Bibdesk-users] Parsing ISI Cited References

2009-01-07 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 7 Jan 2009, at 5:31 AM, Chris Borst wrote: > Thanks for your help Adam. Yes, that worked, by and large. My > apologies > for not finding it in going through the Help docs. Absolutely, the > issue > is multivalued fields. > > The "by and large" reflects two continuing, but entirely workable

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Parsing ISI Cited References

2009-01-07 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Jan 6, 2009, at 11:31 PM, Chris Borst wrote: Thanks for your help Adam. Yes, that worked, by and large. My apologies for not finding it in going through the Help docs. Absolutely, the issue is multivalued fields. The "by and large" reflects two continuing, but entirely workable, probl

Re: [Bibdesk-users] [Bibdesk-develop] Unit Tests

2009-01-07 Thread Gregory Jefferis
( cced to BibDesk users in case any BibDesk + PubMed users want to comment on the choice of journal title field for PubMed imports.) Hi Christian, On 2009-01-07 15:24, "Christiaan Hofman" wrote: > Gregory, (or anyone), can you look over the current PubMed mappings in > TypeInfo.plist in the cur

Re: [Bibdesk-users] [Bibdesk-develop] Unit Tests

2009-01-07 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 7 Jan 2009, at 7:33 PM, Gregory Jefferis wrote: > ( cced to BibDesk users in case any BibDesk + PubMed users want to > comment > on the choice of journal title field for PubMed imports.) > > Hi Christian, > > On 2009-01-07 15:24, "Christiaan Hofman" wrote: > >> Gregory, (or anyone), can you

Re: [Bibdesk-users] [Bibdesk-develop] Unit Tests

2009-01-07 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
Hi Christian, > Thanks. I chose JT because its description seemed closer to bibtex's > Journal field, that is, it's description suggests it includes /only/ > the full title name (rather than the weird values you quote). If TA > generally contains the more appropriate value, it's better to use > th

Re: [Bibdesk-users] [Bibdesk-develop] Unit Tests

2009-01-07 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 7 Jan 2009, at 11:29 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote: > Hi Christian, > >> Thanks. I chose JT because its description seemed closer to bibtex's >> Journal field, that is, it's description suggests it includes /only/ >> the full title name (rather than the weird values you quote). If TA >> gen

Re: [Bibdesk-users] [Bibdesk-develop] Unit Tests

2009-01-07 Thread Gregory Jefferis
Hi Christiaan, Many thanks for fixes and feedback. On 2009-01-07 21:47, "Christiaan Hofman" wrote: > Thanks. I chose JT because its description seemed closer to bibtex's > Journal field, that is, it's description suggests it includes /only/ > the full title name (rather than the weird values yo