t was my idea of keeping two
lists that I didn't like )
Now, my concern is about speed if the list becomes a long one... I will see.
Thank you again for your valuable help!
--
Miguel
Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (UMR6098)
CNRS, Universités d'Aix-Marseille
Le 15 févr. 2010 à 17:27, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 15 févr. 2010 à 16:29, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
Le 15 févr. 2010 à 16:29, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>> [ Having said that, since I installed Snow Leopard, I no longer have the
>> services provided by BibDesk (cite key completion, etc) available in
Le 12 févr. 2010 à 00:53, Adam M. Goldstein a écrit :
> Got it!
>
> French users, test it out, let us know how it works out.
>
> Merci!
>
Hi,
I've been using the latest nightly builds for a couple of days and I haven't
found any particular problem. So this counts as +1.
[ Having said that,
Le 6 janv. 2010 à 09:13, Gilberto a écrit :
>
> In Spanish, "and" translates as "y", but when preceding a word beginning with
> "I", it's "e".
> Does anyone know if there's a way to make BibTeX to automatically use the
> right one?
>
> Freeman and Zavala (1992) would be
> Freeman y Zavala (199
aan
>
> On Dec 22, 2009, at 22:48, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
>> I don't recall any changes to anything related to thios, and I also cannot
>> reproduce it.
>>
>> Christiaan
>>
>> On Dec 22, 2009, at 22:23, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>>
Hi,
As the subject says, the latest nightly build seems not to preserve information
concerning whether a publication has been labelled as 'read' or not: all appear
as not read.
Best regards,
-- Miguel
Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (UMR6098)
CNRS, Universités d'Aix-M
Le 20 déc. 09 à 23:04, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
>
> On Dec 20, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>> Perhaps I would like to include some of the Mesh terms, but
>> definitely, not all or not in all cases, I will explore XML
>> processing for tho
Le 20 déc. 09 à 22:30, Jason Davies a écrit :
> Miguel, maybe it's just OMM but I keep getting told that your
> digital signature is incorrect. (Is that perhaps because it's come
> throuh a list? I don't know about these things...)
>
> On 20 Dec 2009, at 21:09
Le 20 déc. 09 à 21:50, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
On Dec 20, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Hi Adam,
Le 20 déc. 09 à 20:57, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
These used to be mapped to 'Pst', which is still in use in the
MEDLINE format. That would be all right.
OK
Hi Adam,
Le 20 déc. 09 à 20:57, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
On Dec 20, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Could I request the field that follows to be imported?
VALUE
where VALUE can be:
aheadofprint --> in press
ppublish --> printed
epublish --> e
elds
set value of field theField to
""
end repeat
end if
end tell
end repeat
end perform BibDesk ac
Hi Christiaan,
Le 20 déc. 09 à 15:52, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On Dec 20, 2009, at 14:15, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wonder if something has changed in BibDesk 1.4 (or in PubMed, in
which case, of course you need not to know) with respect to the
import of
Hi everyone,
I wonder if something has changed in BibDesk 1.4 (or in PubMed, in
which case, of course you need not to know) with respect to the import
of publications found after a PubMed Search (within BibDesk). It seems
that a lesser number of fields is imported now. One such field that i
Le 26 août 09 à 12:12, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:35, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 août 09 à 22:08, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On Aug 25, 2009, at 15:00, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Hi all,
This may have been asked before, but I have failed to find an
Le 26 août 09 à 03:10, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:46 PM, gilberto.c wrote:
In my document preamble I type:
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
and then use accents everywhere in the text.
The only drawback to this is if you like using latex2rtf, which
Le 25 août 09 à 22:08, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On Aug 25, 2009, at 15:00, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Hi all,
This may have been asked before, but I have failed to find an answer.
If it was asked, I would appreciate a pointer so I can read about it.
So this is the problem: I write
Hi all,
This may have been asked before, but I have failed to find an answer.
If it was asked, I would appreciate a pointer so I can read about it.
So this is the problem: I write some documents using latex/bibtex and
some others (essentially with collaborators who don't use latex) with
Pag
Great release !
Thanks a lot to all the developers!
All the best,
Miguel
Le 19 juin 09 à 03:17, Adam M. Goldstein a écrit :
Hello all
After far too long, BibDesk 1.3.21 has been released. If you choose
"Check for updates" from the "BibDesk" menu, you'll see release
notes, and be guided
Le 10 juin 09 à 18:13, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Hi,
Using the latest nightly build (but I see the same with the latest
release 1.3.20) I cannot figure out how to properly add a template
in the template preference pane ( as
Hi,
Using the latest nightly build (but I see the same with the latest
release 1.3.20) I cannot figure out how to properly add a template in
the template preference pane ( as in: http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/manual/BibDesk%20Help_69.html#SEC130
). I used to know how to do it, because I ha
I confirm: NO problems with GS seaarches in the BibDesk-20090512.dmg
nightly.
Best,
Miguel
Le 19 mai 09 à 18:26, Daniel Becker a écrit :
>
> Am 19.05.2009 um 17:41 schrieb James Harrison:
>
>> I also see this in 1.3.20. GS results appear in the top pane with
>> "Import into BibTeX" links vis
Hi Eckhard,
Same here :-(
The message "indexing files" appears but nothing happens.
As you say, it works fine with 1.3.20
Best,
Miguel
Le 16 mai 09 à 15:53, Eckhard Giere a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I tried several nightly builds including the most recent one and for
> none of them the searching by
Le 8 mai 09 à 19:11, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> On 8 May 2009, at 6:59 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/09 09:46, "Christiaan Hofman" wrote:
>>
I see two journal titles. One is the full title, JT in Medline and
in
XML, and the other is the abbreviated title, TA in Med
Le 11 févr. 09 à 16:28, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>
>> I can understand your point about such script-hook and I agree that
>> the Move to Trash may be useful in a general way. However, I would
>> like to make sure that when I remove a publication from the library
>> the linked files are removed
Le 11 févr. 09 à 12:05, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>
>> Oops! I was convinced it had... but of course you must be right.
>> Can this be done via a script-hook attached to 'Remove File or URL'?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> Miguel
>
> I don't think a remove file/URL script hook should be added. More
>>
>> This script doesn't work with BibDesk 1.3.19 (1387) (I think it was a
>> nightly from late December, when pdf DOI parsing was added, not
>> that I
>> say this has anything to do, just to put a date), ie. it does remove
>> the file from the publication entry but it does not delete it from
Hi,
I have one applescript that I use to delete linked files from a
publication. Although I sometimes keep this publication in my library,
I normally use the script as a previous step to delete the publication
itself. The idea is not to leave unwanted pdf files in the disk.
This script does
Le 25 janv. 09 à 13:29, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:53 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 25 janv. 09 à 12:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
Le 25 janv. 09 à 12:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>&
Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Christian.
>>
>> It now works as I wanted (that is: cite-key is added and pdf auto-
>> filed) provided I set up the prop
janv. 09 à 01:07, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
> I've modified the script hook on the wiki adding some options to allow
> generating the key and/or auto-filing. Open it in Script Editor and
> change the four options to your liking.
>
> Christiaan
>
> On 25 Jan 2009, at 1
#x27;t see
how to force the auto-generation of the key.
Cheers,
Miguel
Le 24 janv. 09 à 22:03, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
> Please download a fixed version of the script hook from the Wiki.
>
> Christiaan
>
> On 24 Jan 2009, at 9:20 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>> S
an
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2009, at 8:34 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>
>> Hi Christiaan,
>>
>> I must be doing something wrong,
thout any associated publication, the info was not retrieved from
PubMed.
If I use the old PMID hidden feature with this same file, it works.
I'm surely missing something...
Best,
Miguel
Le 24 janv. 09 à 19:31, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> On 24 Jan 2009, at 7:23 PM, Miguel Ortiz L
Jan 24, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24 Jan 2009, at 12:35 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Le 24 janv. 09 à 12:12, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> This is not really true, it's just been d
Le 24 janv. 09 à 14:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Christiaan,
>>
>> I'm convinced, thanks. Indeed I had some files converted to the wrong
>> entries because their names were actually a page number and BibDesk
>> found in PubMed a PMID with the same value :-) There were not too
>> many,
Le 24 janv. 09 à 12:12, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
>
> This is not really true, it's just been disabled by default. See the
> Wiki how to re-enable this feature using a hidden preference. The
> reason is that the check is far too generic. Who says an arbitrary
> number is a PMID? In many cases it
Hi,
I just answered Greg Jefferys concerning his excellent 'PubMed lookup
for dropped PDFs' feature. I have tried it and found it great, though,
as I was expecting, some PDFs couldn't be parsed. However, this new
feature seems to have removed the ability of creating entries by
dropping pdf
Hi Christian,
> Thanks. I chose JT because its description seemed closer to bibtex's
> Journal field, that is, it's description suggests it includes /only/
> the full title name (rather than the weird values you quote). If TA
> generally contains the more appropriate value, it's better to use
> th
Hi Greg,
In fact, someone had already filed a bug report in November, but it
was closed apparently with no other solution than requiring users to
use a previous version of BibDesk (1.3.17 or earlier) to do the import
from PubMed, which is, in my opinion, not very useful. This is:
http://sou
Hi Greg,
Thank you for your e-mail. I see that your code is very ad-hoc, like
mine. In fact, it's quite similar. It doesn't directly solve all my
problems but you gave me two good ideas:
1. To look first in the metadata
2. To search as well with PII (DOIs don't work when they include
parenth
Hi Greg,
Not sure to have understood what you want, but I try. Publications in
press include a 'Pst' field with the value 'aheadofprint'. You can
move these references to a dedicated BibDesk Library and then write a
script to check from time to time if the corresponding entries get
updated
43 matches
Mail list logo
