Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://bibdesk-users.661331.n2.nabble.com/Character-conversion-of-math-symbols-2-tp6702746p6703833.html
Sent from the bibdesk users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Get a FRE
Hi Christiaan,
> You did not send the message from the account with which you subscribed to
> this lists, therefore the message was rejected because you were not known.
OK. This was not transparent to me. I thought I was logged in when posting
the message, and it was appearing under "my posts".
Hi,
my previous post is still "pending" and I don' know why I am excluded from
this list of BibDesk users. Have I done anything wrong? I wil try to keep on
posting until I get at least /some/ reaction, so here is my original post:
It seems that in the character conversion preferences for two-way
Hi,
it seems that in the character conversion preferences for two-way
conversions it is impossible to add a math symbol, because the preference
editor forces me to start the TeX string with a "{\" and end it with a "}".
However, I need to convert the unicode character "ζ" into the math symbol
"$\ze
May this post please finally be accepted? It is pending for more than a week
now!
--
View this message in context:
http://bibdesk-users.661331.n2.nabble.com/Character-conversion-of-math-symbols-tp6679699p6702637.html
Sent from the bibdesk users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Thanks, Adam!
Keep rockin'
Kim
--
View this message in context:
http://bibdesk-users.661331.n2.nabble.com/Way-to-make-Skim-default-only-in-Bibdesk-tp2201367p6318354.html
Sent from the bibdesk users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
OK, thanks, I hope to actually not have rocked anyone's boat here, and I
apologize if my postings caused annoyances. As a matter of fact, I'm very
satisfied with BibDesk and will stay a happy user even without that darn
preference item (although in this case a slightly less happy one ;-). Ah,
forge
> If it does get removed, you're the one rocking the boat
> by replying to a 2 year old thread…
>
Hey, that's not fair!
> You may think that you are the "ordinary" or "normal"
> user, but you are not.
>
Hm, I guess everybody's thinking that, right?
> Making a spaghetti of little prefere
> IIRC my complaint with the preference is that it violates the principle of
> least surprise. For example, you have icons for Preview.app that open
> with Skim when double-clicked, and this is an inconsistency.
>
Adam, c'mon, I appreciate that developers think farther than the "simple
user", b
> If you wish to have as an end-user a simple "workflow in a logical and
> transparent manner" then you should let programmers do their job properly.
>
Absolutely.
> Yes BibDesk is great exactly thanks to the care and attention paid by the
> involved programmers.
>
I indeed agree that BibDes
> For a user that didn't know you had set it this way, there would be.
> Expecting Preview if coming from finder, but getting Skim in BD, an
> element of chaos wd be introduced into user experience. Same if
> vice-versa.
>
Well, I wouldn't call it chaos but user-friendly flexibility. What progr
My email crossed yours, sorry for that.
This discussion somewhat escalates. I didn't want to criticize your work,
Christiaan. Right the contrary, I'm a happy user of BibDesk for many years
now. This is not to smooze you, it's just a fact. And I'm thankful that the
(surprisingly controversial) prefe
> I suspect it's because there is a system-wide setting, and that if people
> were to change this just for BD, it would conflict with that setting.
>
I have the system-wide default set to Preview.app and in BibDesk to
Skim.app. It works as expected. No conflict.
> In contrast with TeXShop, wh
Sorry if I'm stepping into this discussion that lately, but I'm also one of
those people with a burning desire for a default-PDF-viewer preference at a
transparent place in BibDesk. In fact, I just didn't find this preference
although I was looking for it in the BibDesk preference pane. I then goog
14 matches
Mail list logo
